Here's the difference. They weren't in areas dominated by men, taking videos for men online. None of those you depicted even match what we see now.
I posted very old pics to show that a) women have been in gyms forever (bc it was asserted that women just arrived at gyms in 2013, lol) , and b) figure-hugging or skin-baring clothes have been standard gear for women working out for eons, far less and closer-fitting than street clothes of similar eras.
The original post included a man talking about his marital status when at the gym and saying the outfits were disturbing his peace. He did not describe the outfits. The easily offended and poorly self-regulated here took that to mean extreme outfits. In truth, long before butt-scrunch shorts, these same criticisms were leveled at women. Including 35 years ago when leggings were all shiny, heavy lycra that couldn't wedge your crotch if you'd wanted them to. Here on the farms, and beyond, leggings as a
general class of clothing have been spoken of as the devil's own elixir and bannable, a very modern and pernicious indicator of endtimes.
I disagree that
1) wearing leggings means you are ipso facto advertising your wares and/or trying to make men betray their marriages. - It means they are what you feel like wearing, and the wearer's motivations are irrelevant and certainly cannot be guessed.
2) leggings (incl yoga pants) at the gym should be banned. - Leggings, in general, are perfectly reasonable clothes, at the gym and, within reason, elsewhere when casual. I know about 8 gazillion college girls who wear them everyday and look perfectly neutral, not sexy or trolling - and I say that as a watchful mother of college kids, and as a "no white shoes until Easter/before Labor Day; you dress for church; and "smooth-the-skin/fat-bulges" kind of person.
3) men cannot be trusted around women. - Of course they can, if they choose to be. And if they manage themselves appropriately, there's no problem. Your thoughts are not other people's to protect.
4) what someone wears is an literal assault. - I am "assaulted" daily by poorly dressed people. I can't send them all home. And I don't feel a need to. I can steam all day about it or not; no one is forcing me to do anything.
The original discussion was about men being victimized and compromised by what women wear.
Not about women's complaints about being leered at or followed around by houndogs.
I can't see camel toes here but I can immediately from any modern chick "working out"
Leggings go up to the crotch. Of course occasionally it's going to wedge if someone ignored their mother's advice and didn't wear underwear. And sometimes even then.
...How about we make a deal? If all guys tuck or flatten so there's no bulge, all women wear garments that don't wedge or shield the potential wedge.
Or you can keep your eyes somewhere other than a lady's crotch.
That only happens because women are more scared of a patriarchal society that would castrate these fools and send them to the gulag.
Women should side with the chuds and the chuds will persecute the trannies out of existence in mere weeks, I assure you.
If we do that will you stop accusing women of living purely for the chance to lasso your eyeballs and direct them to their labia?
Wait, scratch that - I just remembered your plan is total domination (confused for dominion). Can't trust you for a deal!
Norbert didn't say anything about girls exercising topless.
Neither did I.
Despite your hysterical shrieking
Please stop, little guy.
Do people like, actually oogle women at the gym to the point where they stare for a long time and salivate? I see a lot of women at the gym and, at most, all I'll think is "nice legs/tits/ass" and move on to the next machine or excersise.
I'm pretty sure women look at men at the gym the same way too but ultimately everyone moves on and does their thing.
Hot women are everywhere, what the fuck do these people do when they go to a beach and see good looking women there? Do they complain that bikinis are too sexual? I really don't get it.
Yes, exactly.
