Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

Keep defending shit. Baldur's Gate 3 is woke because it has WotC taint smeared all over it. Now if it were more like Divinity, I'd be more forgiving towards it, but it's not, and that explains why Larion won't be making Baldur's Gate 4. They're left leaning like crazy, and even THEY'RE fuckin' tired of dealing with this shit.

I agree that WotC is gay as fuck and full of franchise ruining faggots but BG3 isn't woke. Woke is when 'the message' is absolutely beaten around the head of the player, over and over, with no escape or respite. I'm not going to not buy a good game because of a few fags who I enjoy killing at every opportunity. Gay shit existed in games long before current year.
BG3 is smeared as woke to stop the proper gamers from buying it, in an attempt to stop people from buying a single-player game. Don't fall for the propaganda and become an anti-npc-npc.

There's a ton of queer characters. There's more gay romance than straight romance if you look at the npc
All companions are either bi or playersexuals.
There's a drag queen a tranny voiced by a breedtuber and you can pimp your genitals and pronouns.
The staff is obviously pinkpilled, tranny pilled and progressive

The game is woke that's a fact. Still a good game tho.
I'm not going to defend the gay shit, at all. I don't really give two fucks who voice acts a character, that's autistic as fuck. I care about the game being good, having good player choices. I never romance in games because that's also autistic as fuck. Can the fags be killed and avoided? Yes? then It isn't, in my opinion, woke.

Spiderman 2 is woke because it's unavoidable. Even modding out the fag flags resulted in seething from trannies and they defended that game to hell and back. They don't defend the fact that you can kill fags in BG3. Why is that? Why autistically screech about removing a flag in a single player, but not teh literul genoside of trannies in another game? I believe it's because BG3 isn't woke and/or because the game has only woke-adjacent complaints/praises in attempt to reverse-hogwarts the game.

Make no mistake and regardless of your stance on woke/anti-woke, the industry fucking hates single-player games. The attack on SPG stated back in the 360 days, but that's off-topic and a discussion for another thread.
 
I agree that WotC is gay as fuck and full of franchise ruining faggots but BG3 isn't woke. Woke is when 'the message' is absolutely beaten around the head of the player, over and over, with no escape or respite. I'm not going to not buy a good game because of a few fags who I enjoy killing at every opportunity. Gay shit existed in games long before current year.
BG3 is smeared as woke to stop the proper gamers from buying it, in an attempt to stop people from buying a single-player game. Don't fall for the propaganda and become an anti-npc-npc.

You keep typing words, and all I hear is "Deny, deny, deny".
 
BG3 isn't woke. Woke is when 'the message' is absolutely beaten around the head of the player, over and over, with no escape or respite.
2040s future republican conservative.jpeg
 
I'll just say this about Bear Sex 3, I feel a PnP RPG experience like DnD is essentially a hodgepodge of Craps and Collaborative Storytelling. Oh and autism lots of autism. The one weekly DnD I actually did was full of edgelord shit and degeneracy, why because we were young dorks wanting to make each other laugh.

My biggest gripe with the game is that I just wish it had been classier, because I will never show that damn game to someone who doesn't "get it", just the fact that they included anatomically correct models is real trashy. But beyond that I just don't care that it's filled with silly degenerate sex and violence. At its best BG3 is very funny and has one of the best combat systems in the whole turn based genre.
 
no region of europe had african slaves, only overseas colonies did
europe generally did not have slavery at all after the end of the roman empire, except in regions that were conquered by muslim empires that practiced slavery (turks in the southeast, north africans in the southwest)
Not quite. The Vikings did practice slavery long after the end of the Roman Empire. And the Slavs literally got their name from being used as slaves. Slavery died out in most of Europe as Christianity spread. It was deemed by the Pope and various Christian kings that it was wrong for Christians to enslave Christian converts, so as Pagan areas of Europe Christianized, slavery was slowly banned throughout the continent. This did not apply to the Muslims of course, and slavery continued to be practiced by Europeans against Muslims, and vice versa, in the Mediterranean region for centuries afterwards. This eventually morphed into the Triangular slave trade for the Europeans with the discovery of the New World, while the Muslim slave trade was the largest and most extensive in world history.
 
Does anyone actually read Kotaku anymore? I know IGN still gets traffic due to OCCASIONALLY posting something of substance, but even they're beginning to slow down. Niche Gamer showed us their true colors by complaining about "MUH REVIEW CODES". Is there any gaming news source that hasn't gone completely fucking crazy yet?
There never was any.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: marvlouslie
Does anyone actually read Kotaku anymore? I know IGN still gets traffic due to OCCASIONALLY posting something of substance, but even they're beginning to slow down. Niche Gamer showed us their true colors by complaining about "MUH REVIEW CODES". Is there any gaming news source that hasn't gone completely fucking crazy yet?
Usually, if I'm interested in a game I look for gameplay footage on Youtube or just read the Steam reviews, or just blind buy it. I try to be careful not to buy too many these days, because my backlog is quite large. (Oh, also, I like to wait awhile after games come out now, both for discounts and to find out if there are any hidden problems with them.)

As to Kotaku, people tend to get baited by them and some other sites like The Gamer pretty easily, I think that was where most of their traffic was coming from. However, if that was still a successful strategy, they wouldn't be pivoting to guides.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Foxtrot
Look, I'm not going to mock you if you can at least acknowledge that Baldur's Gate 3 was designed by committee. I am, however, going to continue to laugh at you as you attempt to flail and try explain away the OBVIOUS fucking problems with a lot of the narrative and queer baiting with it. Divinity didn't have this much issues with its overall story and pacing, because it was an original IP. Baldur's Gate has a STAIN on it primarily because of WotC's overall faggotry. Remember? The same WotC that sic'd the fucking PINKERTONS on some random dude who got random early stock of cards?
 
Didn't really need slaves when they had serfs which might as well have been slavery.
It honestly feels like the globalists want to go back to this. They get to be the upper class and they keep the peasants in place unable to move up.
Does anyone actually read Kotaku anymore? I know IGN still gets traffic due to OCCASIONALLY posting something of substance, but even they're beginning to slow down. Niche Gamer showed us their true colors by complaining about "MUH REVIEW CODES". Is there any gaming news source that hasn't gone completely fucking crazy yet?
I pray to god kotaku only gets rage clicks and that people are wising up to that.
I agree. Shut the fuck up and make video games I can buy, code monkey, we don't give a fuck about your troon agenda
Its been brought up before but do we have a thread for good game companies or indies that aren't complete fags?
Cause my wallet is open to them.
E: I sincerely think that having a thread for dev companies worth supporting that make interesting games is worth it.
 
I'm not going to defend the gay shit, at all. I don't really give two fucks who voice acts a character, that's autistic as fuck. I care about the game being good, having good player choices. I never romance in games because that's also autistic as fuck. Can the fags be killed and avoided? Yes? then It isn't, in my opinion,
You are autistic. Being woke or not has nothing to do with being able to kill fags or not or if the game is a single player game with no dlc.

It's about the agenda and the values that the creator have and push.
 
BG3 did a lot right, but the game was very clearly made with wokeness in mind. They even cast a troon eceleb for extra DEI points. Although even they knew enough to make it a background character with minimal screentime.
At least the game lets you save Faerun from their traitorous ilk.
 
There's only one thing I require of game devs. Make a good game that has a fun gameplay loop, and shut the fuck up about your personal politics.
I agree. Shut the fuck up and make video games I can buy, code monkey, we don't give a fuck about your troon agenda
That's actually the reason Nintendo crushed the competition this past generation (discounting Treehouse, of course). They seem to be one of the only gaming companies left with this philosophy still in mind
 
My biggest gripe with the game is that I just wish it had been classier, because I will never show that damn game to someone who doesn't "get it", just the fact that they included anatomically correct models is real trashy. But beyond that I just don't care that it's filled with silly degenerate sex and violence. At its best BG3 is very funny and has one of the best combat systems in the whole turn based genre.
I actually like how classless it is.

Ever other D&D game I've played (aka Neverwinter Nights, KOTOR) felt really abstracted from D&D because of how clean and sanitized it was - like it was a D&D game you were playing at work (aka everyone in business attire, very formal, no one wants to get in trouble).

BG3's characters all feel like the kind of awful characters you'd find playing D&D at home/in a comic shop - the mage who had sex with a god and kind of got bored with it, a sad sparkly vampire, the angry but sensitive barbarian, the warlock who didn't really read the contract all that well, the cleric who worships an evil god (and was tricked!), and so on.

The only thing I wish BG3 had as a single completely normal character as a contrast (a professional soldier, no gimmicks, no tragic backstory) to all of the nonsense going on around them.
 
I actually like how classless it is.

Ever other D&D game I've played (aka Neverwinter Nights, KOTOR) felt really abstracted from D&D because of how clean and sanitized it was - like it was a D&D game you were playing at work (aka everyone in business attire, very formal, no one wants to get in trouble).

BG3's characters all feel like the kind of awful characters you'd find playing D&D at home/in a comic shop - the mage who had sex with a god and kind of got bored with it, a sad sparkly vampire, the angry but sensitive barbarian, the warlock who didn't really read the contract all that well, the cleric who worships an evil god (and was tricked!), and so on.

The only thing I wish BG3 had as a single completely normal character as a contrast (a professional soldier, no gimmicks, no tragic backstory) to all of the nonsense going on around them.
Yeah you pretty much summed up why I'll defend the game. I dunno maybe I'm just a prude but I just really wish we could go back to games being politely censored that you can then just turn on and off to your desire. If I remember correctly BG3 does do that and I wanted to see boobies (because boobies) but I just don't want dicks!

And btw my first DnD character was a cannibal. Any corpse he could find he'd have to try to eat. Why because it made me laugh to have the DM have to put it into the story.

Was BG3 made by a bunch of weirdos, probably they're in the games industry one of the most brutal industries to be in. But I don't think it was woke at all to have Halsin BEAR SEX. It just felt like something absurd. We can laugh at a show like Community portraying Dungeons and Dragons being dorks trying to make each other laugh but BEAR SEX is one step too far? Give me a break.

inb4 someone then brings up some other shit I didn't even see in the game because I did wasn't going to go through ever damn conversation. I'm certain I never found Ollie PhilosophyTroon.
 
That's actually the reason Nintendo crushed the competition this past generation (discounting Treehouse, of course). They seem to be one of the only gaming companies left with this philosophy still in mind

I won't touch anything Nintendo produces because even THEY'RE getting in on this shit now. No. I'm fuckin' done. They don't care about fun games anymore. They did when Reggie was there. Reggie was the last guy that worked at Nintendo that seemed to give a shit. Now, Nintendo's going to push this DEI bullshit on everyone, and I'm not having it.

No. More. New. Games. I'm not giving them the satisfaction.
 
I won't touch anything Nintendo produces because even THEY'RE getting in on this shit now. No. I'm fuckin' done. They don't care about fun games anymore. They did when Reggie was there. Reggie was the last guy that worked at Nintendo that seemed to give a shit. Now, Nintendo's going to push this DEI bullshit on everyone, and I'm not having it.

No. More. New. Games. I'm not giving them the satisfaction.
It always bums me out when I can't really boycott something because it sucks so much I would never have bought it in the first place, with or without wokeshit in it.
 
Back