Generation Z, "Ironic" Degeneracy, Sadism, and Discord - Not a fun thread

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
inb4 @Odd Opossum's tenth reworked "ERM, THIS DOESNT MATTER, WHY DO YOU CARE" post in response. Such a fucking weird hill for him to die on, repeatedly arguing that people shouldn't be worried about an increasing trend of children being involved in the sextortion of other children, as well as the subsequent distribution of CSAM (among many other horrifying things).
 
inb4 @Odd Opossum's tenth reworked "ERM, THIS DOESNT MATTER, WHY DO YOU CARE" post in response. Such a fucking weird hill for him to die on, repeatedly arguing that people shouldn't be worried about an increasing trend of children being involved in the sextortion of other children, as well as the subsequent distribution of CSAM (among many other horrifying things).
Don't pay attention to him. Or string him along, and maybe he'll go so far in his attempt to epicly troll the kiwi forum that he'll unironically start advocating for pedophilia and Null will just permaban him.

He's the embodiment of this schtick:
i was only pretending to be retarded.jpg
Because all he wants is to get a reaction out of people at any cost. At least HHH knows how to get one without looking like a complete ass himself.
 
Because of this, losers, especially dangerous losers, become a collective responsibility for all of us to foot the bill for. The maladjusted chud at risk of shooting up a Walmart or grooming children is a personal tax burden to all of us if he is ever caught and doesn't end up dead by the end of his crimes. Since this is the case, criminal concerns aren't just an individual issue to be handled in a similar vein to how your personal car insurance is handled, but instead is a collective issues that all of us have to bear the burden for by paying for it. This problem is especially pronounced in Euroamerica/"The West" specially since every criminal bust now has the potential to become a big political discussion (I.e, school shootings ending up bringing up gun control again or pedophile rings being busted causing legislation about "banning encryption"/incuring more privacy violations).
When I say losers, I don't mean mass shooters or career criminals, I mean people like NEET's or the "chuds" you're talking about. Speaking of which, I'll refer back to what I said about some of the people on this thread coming off as young and ignorant, because online right wingers have always been (up until the last decade or so) seen as weirdos partially because they posted stuff like what's being shown on here.
repeatedly arguing that people shouldn't be worried about an increasing trend of children being involved in the sextortion of other children, as well as the subsequent distribution of CSAM (among many other horrifying things).
I never said anything like that.
 
When I say losers, I don't mean mass shooters or career criminals, I mean people like NEET's or the "chuds" you're talking about. Speaking of which, I'll refer back to what I said about some of the people on this thread coming off as young and ignorant, because online right wingers have always been (up until the last decade or so) seen as weirdos partially because they posted stuff like what's being shown on here.

I never said anything like that.
You said something like that. You are delegitimizing that fact that more children are being preyed open now than any other point in human history. You will hang, pedophile.
plierpc.jpg
 
I never said anything like that.
This thread is about specific communities and people sexually preying upon children, and you're coming in with the hot take "guys, there was '2 Girls, 1 Cup' back in my day, so what?" and "even if these communities ruin some lives, it won't personally inconvenience me!"

It's not surprising you're being taken as arguing that no one should be concerned about this wave of calculated child predators. You either missed the point of the thread or decided to bypass it completely to make some dumbass point undermining the original contention of the thread.
 
You said something like that. You are delegitimizing that fact that more children are being preyed open now than any other point in human history. You will hang, pedophile.
View attachment 5928696
This thread is about specific communities and people sexually preying upon children, and you're coming in with the hot take "guys, there was '2 Girls, 1 Cup' back in my day, so what?" and "even if these communities ruin some lives, it won't personally inconvenience me!"

It's not surprising you're being taken as arguing that no one should be concerned about this wave of calculated child predators. You either missed the point of the thread or decided to bypass it completely to make some dumbass point undermining the original contention of the thread.
Again, take a look at his postings and come to the logical conclusion that he always posts things to stir shit up in threads and derail them, connect the dots and stop replying to him. As long as you engage with his purposefully idiotic takes he will keep posting them all over the forum. The moment every single one of you idiots realize that this is all he does and stop replying, he'll stop posting too.
 
Again, take a look at his postings and come to the logical conclusion that he always posts things to stir shit up in threads and derail them, connect the dots and stop replying to him. As long as you engage with his purposefully idiotic takes he will keep posting them all over the forum. The moment every single one of you idiots realize that this is all he does and stop replying, he'll stop posting too.
the block button works wonders
 
This thread is about specific communities and people sexually preying upon children, and you're coming in with the hot take "guys, there was '2 Girls, 1 Cup' back in my day, so what?" and "even if these communities ruin some lives, it won't personally inconvenience me!"

It's not surprising you're being taken as arguing that no one should be concerned about this wave of calculated child predators. You either missed the point of the thread or decided to bypass it completely to make some dumbass point undermining the original contention of the thread.
No, I made an argument against another poster and that apparently was too much for everyone but @LarpBait to handle without turning into gibbering chimps.
Again, take a look at his postings and come to the logical conclusion that he always posts things to stir shit up in threads and derail them, connect the dots and stop replying to him. As long as you engage with his purposefully idiotic takes he will keep posting them all over the forum. The moment every single one of you idiots realize that this is all he does and stop replying, he'll stop posting too.
Dude, you and a few others are the only ones sperging out right now, over nothing. I don't know why so many on here just fall to pieces when I post something, but you need to get over it.
 
Don't pay attention to him. Or string him along, and maybe he'll go so far in his attempt to epicly troll the kiwi forum that he'll unironically start advocating for pedophilia and Null will just permaban him.

He's the embodiment of this schtick:
View attachment 5928648
Because all he wants is to get a reaction out of people at any cost. At least HHH knows how to get one without looking like a complete ass himself.
Basically. He's trying to not get it. It's very simple to understand that extreme content today is a lot more readily available to kids today than it was when we were children, parents give their kids smartphones when they are too young and with next to non-supervision and pedos and other bad actors take advantage of that fact to groom kids and create more of their kind. It's very obviously a problem to anyone that wants to live a sane society and one that needs an honest to God solution.
 
Basically. He's trying to not get it. It's very simple to understand that extreme content today is a lot more readily available to kids today than it was when we were children, parents give their kids smartphones when they are too young and with next to non-supervision and pedos and other bad actors take advantage of that fact to groom kids and create more of their kind. It's very obviously a problem to anyone that wants to live a sane society and one that needs an honest to God solution.
No, I understand it and agree with the rest of your post, I just disagree with the idea the internet has become more degenerate and that some young people turning into social failures because of dumb shit they read online will rot society.
 
I really don't like the online right wing(spic fuentes)
Fuentes himself has been associated with and has been adjacent to a whole subculture of "ironic" anime nazi pederasts openly congregating on sites like Twitter/X since what, 2018? Mind you, "fringe" right-wing spaces always had a problem with weirdo degenerates popping up and breeding like cockroaches unless culled regularly. At certain points the "average" libertarian on 4chon believed the most erotic part of a woman is >her penis and the age of consent should be about 12.
 
Last edited:
parents give their kids smartphones when they are too young and with next to non-supervision and pedos and other bad actors take advantage of that fact to groom kids and create more of their kind. It's very obviously a problem to anyone that wants to live a sane society and one that needs an honest to God solution.
Ironic that most parents give their child a phone in case of a kidnapping by a pedophile only to for it to expose them to more predators than they ever would of without the internet.
1693185262652.jpg
 
parents give their kids smartphones when they are too young and with next to non-supervision and pedos and other bad actors take advantage of that fact
I still remember when this guy was trying to warn parents and teach them to monitor their child's Internet use only for the normie-slop talking heads like MoistCr1tik4l to put out videos attacking the guy and calling him an awful human being for suggesting parents make sure their teens aren't selling their nudes to creeps on Twitter.

People resist the most obvious solutions to these problems.
 
Wake up and smell the ashes. The internet was not always like this. If you paid any attention you will see that the degeneracy got worse as the western world got worse. Kids were never this fucked in the head before.

When I was using the internet as a kid there was only the odd site like Rotten with gore or porn and it was very easy to avoid. The first time I ran into anything disgusting was in the late 00s when I signed up to a dating site and old gay men sent me dick pics (I said I was straight in my profile but I was a teen so a target for faggots).
The internet is built to be a coomer's paradise. For the past 30 years, technological development has mainly been driven by making pornography more accessible and affordable. We're seeing this now with the big push for AI images -- it has no real application outside porn. In addition, anonymous posting, downloading, colour images, video streaming, live streaming, GIFs, colour pictures, e-commerce, encrypted communication -- were initially developed for porn users, and any other application for these things has been purely serendipitous. You could go further back to say that cable television, VHS, and DVD were initially built for porn -- some estimates have stated that 80% of consumer electronics were initially made for porn.

If you think that it's a coincidence that you can happen to find any porn imaginable online, that you have a pocket-sized device that allows you to access any porn you want discreetly from anywhere at any time, and that said device also has a camera that allows you to film women and girls without their knowledge, you're either misinformed or in deep denial. You say degeneracy was easy to avoid on the old internet, but it was also very male-dominated ("there are no girls on the internet") -- why do you think that is? Not because women like shopping, drinking, and watching Sex and the City instead of using the computer -- there are plenty of women who love tech and niche hobbies/media. Women and girls tend to avoid environments that are hostile to them, and there's nothing more hostile than a space designed for perverts to act out (watch porn) without consequence. Similarly, men who use the internet/tech a lot are stereotyped as fat, unkempt, losers who can't get a girlfriend because they spend all their time in a space designed for porn addicts first and foremost -- the "incel neckbeard" is the modern version of the classic Glen Quagmire sex pest for a reason.

All this to say, the rise in "ironic" degeneracy is the inevitable consequence of normalizing internet culture through social media and smartphones. If we want this to stop, we need to change the way the internet is built, which means removing online anonymity, banning smartphones, banning VPNs/deepweb, and bringing back shame around excessive internet usage. I know this is deeply unpopular here because all our bosses would have gotten 5 AM girl talks if we weren't anonymous, but if there wasn't online anonymity, Dong-Gone would be in jail by now, and we wouldn't have to live in fear of gender ideology since it spreads through porn and grooming that's protected by anonymity. I know people say "there will always be a loophole in any porn-banning legislation that renders it useless", but if everything you do online is tied to your real name, nobody will use porn anymore out of shame, and the most secretive way of finding it will be IRL (which will prevent a lot of escalation and addiction issues).
 
it has no real application outside porn
Hard disagree. It can be used to generate textures for video games instead of doing the hard work of taking photos, editing them, or making them from scratch. And corporations will love the ability to generate some basic bitch stock images or other corporate abstracts without having to pay some artist to do that.

Also, shitposts. There are many applications for AI images outside of porn.
In addition, anonymous posting, downloading, colour images, video streaming, live streaming, GIFs, colour pictures, e-commerce, encrypted communication -- were initially developed for porn users, and any other application for these things has been purely serendipitous. You could go further back to say that cable television, VHS, and DVD were initially built for porn -- some estimates have stated that 80% of consumer electronics were initially made for porn.
Okay this is a fucking schizo theory. Unless you can bring up examples that each of those technologies were invented just for the sake of porn, you're talking out of your ass.

By this completely asinine logic, porcelain mugs were invented for porn because the ancient Greeks put pornography on pottery.
1713823750664.png
The VHS being built for porn, or winning over Betamax because it allowed for porn, is all urban legends too. Betamax allowed for porn, the reason it lost to VHS was because it was more expensive, more restrictive and in the early days it held less footage, and no, not because the porn industry couldn't expose people to more hours of Ron Jeremy, but because regular movies wouldn't fit on a Betamax. They did fit on a VHS, and the cassette rental market was too big for Betamax to stay afloat with it's disadvantages.

You know what's another big issue with all this technology? It's that people can say whatever they want, put it up on a soapbox, other people can read it and a lot of idiocy can arise from it. Things like people completely mislabeling music on Napster and other P2P file sharing sites leading to common misconceptions like SOAD making a Legend of Zelda cover, and people like you that somehow believe that all the technological advancements from the 70's up until today were made only for porn, possibly with some conspiracy theory about a Jewish cabal somewhere within it.

Also, "some estimates have stated that 80% of consumer electronics were initially made for porn"? What an oddly broad claim to make with no sources to back it up with.
If we want this to stop, we need to change the way the internet is built, which means removing online anonymity, banning smartphones, banning VPNs/deepweb, and bringing back shame around excessive internet usage. I know this is deeply unpopular here because all our bosses would have gotten 5 AM girl talks if we weren't anonymous, but if there wasn't online anonymity, Dong-Gone would be in jail by now, and we wouldn't have to live in fear of gender ideology since it spreads through porn and grooming that's protected by anonymity. I know people say "there will always be a loophole in any porn-banning legislation that renders it useless", but if everything you do online is tied to your real name, nobody will use porn anymore out of shame, and the most secretive way of finding it will be IRL (which will prevent a lot of escalation and addiction issues).
And you think this won't affect you personally in the long run? What, just because you're not doing anything illegal and you won't use the Internet? No wonder you believe in this schizo theory that all tech was designed for porn, you're as gullible as a toddler. If you want your porn free utopia, it already exists in China, go move there and see just how well that works. And don't give me "but China won't happen in the West", they didn't became this nightmarish surveillance state overnight, they gradually moved the goalpost by making people get behind ideas like the ones you're preaching here. And then oops, you cannot say anything bad about your government because you're watched 24/7. But hey, at least kids aren't watching porn anymore and sexual degeneracy is defeated, right?

You are the result of excessive use of the Internet. You look at this very narrow cutout of degenerate zoomers online and you believe that this is the norm, that all of this is because of the Internet and you jump to reactionary extreme conclusions. Go outside, talk to people, and compare that to what the Internet made you believe the world looks like. I might do just that because goddamn I haven't seen a person this retarded online in a while and I need a breather.
 
As far as why anyone should care, I’d just like to remind everyone that a lot of the info in this thread was found from digging into Torswats/Alan Filion, who was responsible for SWATting a U.S. congresswoman and framing a KF moderator for it.

The Farms has endured a lot of shit over the past two years in particular, and the majority of it involves us being accused of stuff that is not only blatantly against the site rules, but that most KF users have no interest in doing. Null works hard to run a clean, open, and legal website, and yet this site has had no end of problems with false accusations that we wage organized harassment campaigns, threaten people, SWAT people, and host all manners of illegal content.

My point is, all that horrible shit that KF regularly gets accused of doing? These people are out there doing it. And they certainly aren’t going to complain that we're the ones who take the blame.

If for no other reason, we should at least care about who these people are and what they're doing for the same reason that we care about what Liz Fong-Jones is up to.
 
Back