Jim Sterling / James "Stephanie" Sterling / James Stanton/Sexton & in memoriam TotalBiscuit (John Bain) - One Gaming Lolcow Thread

I think its perfectly justifible to review a game without ever completing it because especially back in the day reviews were didn't to be done on a usually pretty short timeframe and its very understandable for someone to stop after they've experienced a good portion of the game, I think a short "this is how much I played, here is where I stopped" would solve most issues of people claiming someone hasn't played enough. Though from what I remember from the video its mostly just him seething and coping about people shitting on him over his Zelda review.
Some games' review copies back in the 90s had debug features enabled, letting the reviewers hop around anywhere in the game and adjust their stats or whatever other kinds of features they had, to let them get a crash course on the game without having to play through it to get all those experiences. Maybe they should bring that back for the low attention span toddlers that review games now.
 
Some games' review copies back in the 90s had debug features enabled, letting the reviewers hop around anywhere in the game and adjust their stats or whatever other kinds of features they had, to let them get a crash course on the game without having to play through it to get all those experiences. Maybe they should bring that back for the low attention span toddlers that review games now.
It would be worth it just to have an actual “game journalist mode” option to laugh at.
 
The issue for me isn't that Jimmy boy doesn't 100% finish games before reviewing them, it's why he doesn't finish them. Jim doesn't complete games because he fucking hates video gaming. That's fine but you can't expect anyone to give a fuck about your opinion of something when it's clear you hate the entire medium and everything around it. If he wasn't such a broke coward he'd drop games and become the wrestling, tranny activist he wants to be.

Even then, I still think Jim would start to take shortcuts. Jim's that guy that never wants to try in life but laments how much his life sucks dick. Video games where an escape for Jim just like wrestling and pretending to be a woman are now, the only difference is that games are his job. The moment he needs to put out tranny or wrestling content to pay his bills he'd immediately fall into the same old story of slacking off and complaining.
 
This is the part with Drinker, MauLer, and this sphere of YouTube in general I don't get - it's not hard to praise something with a woke part. You can say "I enjoy the Amazon Fallout Show despite [Insert stupid cringe here]". The concept of not liking parts of something but enjoying it as a whole is something most adults can comprehend.

EDIT: I posted this in the wrong thread but I'm keeping it here as well. I find it really funny so many people like this comment despite it being "off-topic"
I don't usually use this as a chance to toot my own horn, since.... Mostly my reviews are fucking idiocy designed solely to entertain you guys, but it did make me realize something and I would like to share that with you all: When I review particularly shitty games, often ones with very blatant political angling, more often than not, the game's underpinning message is often a very distant second to how bad the game itself is.

For example, when I covered Terfenstein, the thing that jumped out at me was the gameplay imitating Operation Body Count, with player bullets hitting open doors and health items that didn't function correctly, turning every level into E4M1 from Ultimate Doom, along with Secrets that had nothing in them and levels with useless doors that can't open. The hilariously misogynistic enemy and encounter design barely even fucking registered in my mind compared to shit like this and the fact that the game has no on-board support and crashes if you try to minimize it.

Similar was true for Extreme Meatpunks Forever - the core problem with the game was the atrocious writing and broken gameplay controls, with the game's political content barely making a single solitary blip on the radar up until the point where you realized that because of it the entire story had its bottom fall out about 20 minutes in.

Exceptions are placed for games like Smash MAGA, where the game's political messaging is front-and-center that it's impossible to go 20 feet without mentioning it, but even then, the gameplay loop is so atrocious and the moment-to-moment gameplay so bad that I can't look at it and envision a moment where someone goes: "Yeah, this is a game I legitimately want to play as someone with options."

It's not specifically a leftie thing, either. The same complaints about Terfenstein can be just as easily leveraged at Ethnic Cleansing. Smash MAGA reminded me of Angry Goy as much as anything else (though that may have been due to how much asset theft was going on). I've never found a rightoid game that tries to do what Extreme Meatpunks Forever does, but I'm pretty sure that's because no one but a leftist would intentionally create a game with crytyping in it. It made me appreciate Alex Jones: NWO Wars all the more because at least that game was roasting itself and Alex Jones in general.

What I'm getting at with all of this is that even with blatantly political games, it should be very easily to divorce the work from its shittiest aspects. I am 100% not the intended audience for A Night In the Woods, and I would very much like it if the surviving dev of the game (the one responsible for almost none of the quality writing and most of the questionable writing) would fuck off and/or leave the internet entirely, either or, preferably both, in either order, but even I could find shit to enjoy in that game. The problem with the culture war shit is that as it escalates, it drives off the chance for nuanced takes. Someone objectively breaking something down is going to get the same tongue-lashing from the usual suspects as someone who doesn't even bother and goes "lol bad game bad," and I can't fully blame them for just taking a shot at things when it's going to be construed in the worst way anyway.

But I also feel there is room for it. You just need to find a way to do it yourself.
And if some dumb asshole like me can do it, then people with actual talent and a budget and editing skills have fucking no excuse.
 
Some games' review copies back in the 90s had debug features enabled, letting the reviewers hop around anywhere in the game and adjust their stats or whatever other kinds of features they had, to let them get a crash course on the game without having to play through it to get all those experiences. Maybe they should bring that back for the low attention span toddlers that review games now.
Game devs shouldn't do that, because then the reviewers aren't actually playing the full game and giving an objective review.
 
Because, much like the opposite side of the spectrum, if you are not 100% in lockstep with the gospel the anti-woke crowd has, they'll skin you alive for it. Wouldn't want to lose the free YT money after all.
but even I could find shit to enjoy in that game. The problem with the culture war shit is that as it escalates, it drives off the chance for nuanced takes.
I think the issue has become, for both sides, that anything other than absolute rejection, condemnation and destruction of everything the other side says is total support, endorsement and contribution to everything they say. There is no nuisance to the arguments anymore due to the fear that if you appear to agree with them on one point, people might worry you will agree with them on other points. Which is hilarious because you will see them them absolutely loving and praising a game and then condemning it endlessly when they notice one thing they disagree with and going back on everything they liked once they notice it. A great example of this is actually Baldur's Gate 3, as well as the video game releases of Wraith of the Righteous and Kingmaker for Pathfinder.

The liberal shit they complain about isn't new mind, I've picked up games from the 90s with these "issues", but most people just ignored the 10% they didn't like because they other 90% was free of it. I also want to point out you see this issue most aggressively with things based off TTRPGs where most people don't realize just how traditionally far left they are because in most TTRPGs you can easily ignore the parts that don't match your political beliefs. Forgotten Realms has been INCREDIBLY horny and gay since inception, seriously Ed Greenwood runs with his cock in his hand and is almost as left leaning as Marx, and Paizo is stupidly far-left in their setting and beliefs as well. Lets be honest, most people don't use official settings, adventures, and/or lore all that much so they usually won't know just how fucking gay that shit actually can be at times. Instead they make up their own stuff, especially GMs because that is the exact type of person attracted to the role, and never read the official stuff at any point so their view of what the material these things are "meant" for is very warped by their personal beliefs and experiences and not based upon the official material.

The other place you see these complaints is retconning of old IP, and honestly they're right. Fuck anyone who changes an IP for their own political beliefs. It is one thing to expand it and add to it, even if I don't politically agree with what that addition is, it is another thing if you change old defined factors about the IP so as to suit your own political beliefs. Just go fucking make your own shit.

I don't have time to review is his review right now, but Jim released a review of Sker Ritual [a] and gave it a 2/10 and the metacritic at this time is a 50 with a user score of TBD (only one user review of 0 at the time of writing). Steam has given it an 81% currently, but those positive reviews seem to be from Early Access which generally say "decent enough, just unpolished should be better on full release" so take that as you will.
 
Last edited:

Its funny that Jim mentions he bought two deluxe editions for games in this video when last JQ he was complaining about the whole "tipping devs" thing, because that is basically what a deluxe edition is. But to the actual topic of the video I don't know anything about Sker Ritual so will focus on Helldivers 2 since I've been wanting a good chance to complain about Jim's stance on it.

Anyone who was online during the release of the game will know how massively popular it was and how unavoidable it was to see stuff about it, it was very clear that the game picked up a playerbase far larger than the AA devs ever expected and you'd think with Jim being around as long as he had would know that when it comes to server issues (especially when the issue is overcrowding) there is no quick and easy solution but he still went in and did HD2 dirty.

He says a few times how online co-op games need to have contingencies (as it says in the title) but that completely ignores that often the core appeal of these games is playing them with people, he wants a "more balanced singleplayer experience" and that already exists by playing a lower difficulty but wouldn't isn't a good solution because half the fun with the game is the dumb interactions you get with other people. I don't think he even once mentions that having local co-op should be a standard for co-op games when that is clearly the solution, but he doesn't actually care about multiplayer games always being playable in some degree because he just wants games to cater to his tastes.
 
He says a few times how online co-op games need to have contingencies (as it says in the title) but that completely ignores that often the core appeal of these games is playing them with people, he wants a "more balanced singleplayer experience" and that already exists by playing a lower difficulty but wouldn't isn't a good solution because half the fun with the game is the dumb interactions you get with other people. I don't think he even once mentions that having local co-op should be a standard for co-op games when that is clearly the solution, but he doesn't actually care about multiplayer games always being playable in some degree because he just wants games to cater to his tastes.
Let's counterpoint Jim's argument with Jim's argument.
 

Its funny that Jim mentions he bought two deluxe editions for games in this video when last JQ he was complaining about the whole "tipping devs" thing, because that is basically what a deluxe edition is. But to the actual topic of the video I don't know anything about Sker Ritual so will focus on Helldivers 2 since I've been wanting a good chance to complain about Jim's stance on it.

Anyone who was online during the release of the game will know how massively popular it was and how unavoidable it was to see stuff about it, it was very clear that the game picked up a playerbase far larger than the AA devs ever expected and you'd think with Jim being around as long as he had would know that when it comes to server issues (especially when the issue is overcrowding) there is no quick and easy solution but he still went in and did HD2 dirty.

He says a few times how online co-op games need to have contingencies (as it says in the title) but that completely ignores that often the core appeal of these games is playing them with people, he wants a "more balanced singleplayer experience" and that already exists by playing a lower difficulty but wouldn't isn't a good solution because half the fun with the game is the dumb interactions you get with other people. I don't think he even once mentions that having local co-op should be a standard for co-op games when that is clearly the solution, but he doesn't actually care about multiplayer games always being playable in some degree because he just wants games to cater to his tastes.
StopKillingGames has been going on for weeks now. This video (as many have been before) is entirely too late.
 
Not surprising Jim wants to cry about Helldivers 2 not letting him play by himself. I imagine the game would be pretty shit if you had to play solo like he does or if you had to play with Redditfags to get Super Samples. There's plenty of actual issues the game has to complain about, but I know that since unlike Jim, I can play the game with three buddies who aren't retarded. You can definitely solo higher difficulties if you know what you're doing though. I usually solo Suicide Mission if everyone else is busy and I'm pretty trash at the game/constantly bitch about the terrible enemy design of devistators and hunters. I suppose with Jim being a troon, he probably avoids difficulties with the word suicide in them though.
 
He probably doesn't have a choice in the matter: as soon as other players know he's in the lobby they immediately leave.
But that would be transphobic (hah, my cellphone dictionary doesn't know that word)!
I can't believe that I was a fan of his a few years back. How times have changed. Fucking hypocrisy and laziness with everything he touches. Disgusting display.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: An empty shill
He probably doesn't have a choice in the matter: as soon as other players know he's in the lobby they immediately leave.
That's true. Either they leave, he gets kicked by the host, or he gets WingsOfRedemption'd and team killed as soon as the game starts.
 
But that would be transphobic (hah, my cellphone dictionary doesn't know that word)!
I can't believe that I was a fan of his a few years back. How times have changed. Fucking hypocrisy and laziness with everything he touches. Disgusting display.


Don't feel bad, there was a time when he did make some legit points and entertaining content.
 
Don't feel bad, there was a time when he did make some legit points and entertaining content.
Until Jim trooned out, my biggest criticism of him was never that he was wrong. It was that he made the same show about the same topic over and over again and it seemed to be all he had to say as an industry commentator.

If you were new to his channel, you wouldn't know that until you'd been watching him for quite a while.
 
I don't know what separated Jim from everyone else because he just seemed like another dime by the dozen snarky internet critic in a """ironic""" Nazi outfit.

Wasn't worth sitting through the long ass escapists ads just to hear some shrill voice bitching about basic bitch shit.

Least Yahtzee was funny enough to make it worth it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mimitchi
I don't know what separated Jim from everyone else because he just seemed like another dime by the dozen snarky internet critic in a """ironic""" Nazi outfit.

Wasn't worth sitting through the long ass escapists ads just to hear some shrill voice bitching about basic bitch shit.

Least Yahtzee was funny enough to make it worth it.
From what I remember, back when the Jimquisition kicked off, the "snarky ironic" critic in the gaming space was also more of the screaming angry rage critics. By contrast, Jim was relatively well spoken and concise for the standards of the time, and wasn't trying to blow your ears out or make himself out to be some kinda badass. Combine that with jumping into the scene just at the right time to be caught up with the late 2000's early 2010's internet creator and gaming explosions, and he was pretty much set up for success. Got it too, just rode it into the dirt now.
 
This is the part with Drinker, MauLer, and this sphere of YouTube in general I don't get - it's not hard to praise something with a woke part. You can say "I enjoy the Amazon Fallout Show despite [Insert stupid cringe here]". The concept of not liking parts of something but enjoying it as a whole is something most adults can comprehend.

EDIT: I posted this in the wrong thread but I'm keeping it here as well. I find it really funny so many people like this comment despite it being "off-topic"
It's because they don't actually care, or at least don't think they care about woke shit, they care about quality and they like things if they're high quality. They can't bring themselves to tie woke down to actual principles or a political stance so it ends up being abstracted as "bad quality". Their internal logic probably goes something like this:

If I like it -> It is Good Quality
Woke things are Bad Quality
Ergo If I like it it is not woke.

They, like many people fundamentally consider themselves "neutral" and "reasonable people" who listen to both sides and think things just went a little bit crazy, a little bit kooky. When that's your image of yourself or your worldview rather it's tough to admit to yourself that you don't like something in part or in whole because of your political stance, especially if it's counter to the popular sentiment.


Because, much like the opposite side of the spectrum, if you are not 100% in lockstep with the gospel the anti-woke crowd has, they'll skin you alive for it. Wouldn't want to lose the free YT money after all.
Yeah, I'm sure the milquetoast retards that fall all over themselves to appear neutral, reasonable and not-political will go really hard on the 1 million subscriber guy that's effectively the biggest guy in the scene, lol. He's doing it because of personal reasons/worldview and a fear of getting locked in as racist, sexist who is unacceptable to the mainstream. Especially now that he apparently has a movie deal?
 
Back