Matthew Craig Judge / Matthew Judge / DarkViperAU / DarkViper8888 / DarkViper88 - Former Atheist Debater, Copyright Abuser, Pseudo-Intellectual, Emotional Toddler, Compared Reaction Content to Rape, Considered Suicide Because of a Troll, Paid 3000$ to Remove A Video That Made Fun of him, Burns Bridges With People Over Stupid Bullshit.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Sprate Header said:
Matthew on his way to pay his lawyer $100,000 to file takedown forms incorrectly.
Click to expand...
1713939978928.png
AltisticRight said:
What a histrionic queer. He will troon out soon.
Click to expand...
You don't get it when he does reaction content or freebooting of atheist debates it's for the public good and it doesn't harm anyone. When a reactor does it, THEN it's a problem and they should be thrown into the lion's den. Classic Matthew hypocrisy.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Nigga Bullshit, Markass the Worst, Harm and 4 others
Nigga Bullshit said:
He has updated his Twitter bio [A] accordingly:
View attachment 5932695

Before:
View attachment 5932842
The anti-react crusade has continued on:
View attachment 5932708
Source [A]

View attachment 5932720
Source [A]
View attachment 5932736
Source [A]
Click to expand...
He was doing so good up until now, too. His take is stupid. Yes, videos get suppressed in the algorithm. But to imply that react channels deliberately go out of their way to fuck over everyone else is just bad faith.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Nigga Bullshit, Markass the Worst and Josephine Knezevic
ibullybullies said:
He was doing so good up until now, too. His take is stupid. Yes, videos get suppressed in the algorithm. But to imply that react channels deliberately go out of their way to fuck over everyone else is just bad faith.
Click to expand...
The issue is people just don’t care. The people who are being reacted to don’t care and even thank the reactors. DV runs up to them in panic, attempting to convince them how they have actually been conned. They still don’t care.

He’s so dogmatic and self-righteous that he can’t even narrow his target to exclude high quality reactors like Vlogging Through History (who DV sided against when VTH was striked by CGPGrey). Even his dickriders couldn’t watch DV slander VTH. Everyone loves VTH, the guy gives these fantastic historical insights when watching videos. Imagine how much of a miserable lowlife you have to be to attack someone like that.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: UnFuNnYmEmE, Nigga Bullshit, A Bit Concerning and 4 others
XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG said:
I have found my answer, thanks
Click to expand...
Reacter and reactor aren't strictly the same.

If we're talking about human interaction:
A reacter will react without much thought, impulsively.
A reactor will react with thought, logic, etc.
So reacter would be the preferred spelling here.

In the context of chemistry, a reactor is a device while while a reacter is a thing that reacts, like some kind of chemical.
The same applies to other technical fields. Reactor is a device, reacter is a "thing" from an event causing a reaction.

For these reasons, reacter isn't used much. It's not even seen as a word because most would assume you cannot spell.

/autism
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Jarch6, Gorton Colu, Unironick and 3 others
  • Agree
Reactions: AltisticRight and Markass the Worst
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back