Bad writing and fucking up the lore are two different things. People were specifically talking about the lore being fucked up, mostly because they're too retarded to understand what an arrow means in the context of a timeline. I'm not defending the writing from a quality standpoint, I'm pointing out that the lore has not been fucked with. Every lore complaint people have brought up is either based on a misunderstanding of the show or the source material they think it's contradicting.
If you respond to me arguing about lore to point out that there's an interracial kiss, I assume that you're arguing that interracial kisses break the lore somehow and was only inserted because of DEI or because the Jews wanted it or something. For example: I don't play warhammer, but I hear they've recently retconned women into positons that have been excusively male. That would be "raping the lore." The Fallout lore, however, explictly had Shady Sands be diverse since the first game because it was settled by a vault experiment forcing diverse people to live together in a small space to see if they'd all kill each other. The black man is from Shady Sands, it makes sense that he's not white. The white girl is from a vault you had to pay to live in, it makes sense that she is white.
If you're responding to my post talking about lore with a rebuttal that's entirely unrelated to my post, that makes you a retard.
If you think the writing is bad because Shady Sands is diverse in the first place, then the bad writing happened when they wrote it into Fallout 1 and it's not new to the TV show.
If you think the writing is bad because you don't like lines like "you're a gentleman and a scholar", I agree with you, that line was dumb. It doesn't rape the lore though.
