- Joined
- Jun 3, 2016
wow...holy crap, you needed to spoil that photo with the caption not compatible with a full stomach.
Greta Gustava Martela / Kjel Anderson & Nina Chaubal / Niraj Chaubal - Stole $350k+ from Trans Lifeline, kill count of 2+ from negligence, Founders of Sisterwood/La Zorra.
- Thread starter CatParty
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2016
Off topic, but with all due respect, that's an analogy.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
In a sense, but by their very nature, oversimplified parodies quite often are. However, my underlying point, that open discussion and study of the causes of the "disorder," be they cultural, environmental, and/or biological, are stymied for the sake of the fee fees of a histrionic portion of its sufferers, still stands.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parody
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2016
Holy shit @ that reveal about his punk girlfriend. It's very illuminating.
Seems like he's a guy that failed at a few identities in a row (rocker, father, soldier) and picked 'woman' as an appropriate one to fuck up next.
Seems like he's a guy that failed at a few identities in a row (rocker, father, soldier) and picked 'woman' as an appropriate one to fuck up next.
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2016
It's hilarious to watch when people talk about why, for this ONE PARTICULAR THING, all analogies are really foolish and stupid, you're not allowed to make analogies or parody it because they're not exactly the same as the thing you're analogizing to.
In my experience, people only do this when they're defending the indefensible -- when all analogies make it clear you're doing something reprehensible or ugly, the only way to maintain a point of view is to shove your fingers in your ears and demand to never hear anyone make an analogy.
It's why I thought it was hilarious when the same leftists who got so angry at Trump's "Skittles" analogy were literally using the same analogy themselves a few months before about dating and rapists. But of course, when it's something they don't like, analogies are all terrible and wrong and people aren't skittles!!!!!!11 Better to say that than to admit something like "ok, yeah, some of these immigrants could be really fucked up terrorists and maybe I wouldn't eat any of those skittles" or "it is just as offensive for someone to claim they need access to things set aside for women while being male as it would be for someone to claim they were black to get a scholarship for black students."
If you think your point of view is so sui generis that it's positively without analogue in all of human existence, odds are, you're either totally crazy or trying to avoid the cognitive dissonance that would be caused by actually listening to someone who disagrees with you and is trying to communicate with you about why.
In my experience, people only do this when they're defending the indefensible -- when all analogies make it clear you're doing something reprehensible or ugly, the only way to maintain a point of view is to shove your fingers in your ears and demand to never hear anyone make an analogy.
It's why I thought it was hilarious when the same leftists who got so angry at Trump's "Skittles" analogy were literally using the same analogy themselves a few months before about dating and rapists. But of course, when it's something they don't like, analogies are all terrible and wrong and people aren't skittles!!!!!!11 Better to say that than to admit something like "ok, yeah, some of these immigrants could be really fucked up terrorists and maybe I wouldn't eat any of those skittles" or "it is just as offensive for someone to claim they need access to things set aside for women while being male as it would be for someone to claim they were black to get a scholarship for black students."
If you think your point of view is so sui generis that it's positively without analogue in all of human existence, odds are, you're either totally crazy or trying to avoid the cognitive dissonance that would be caused by actually listening to someone who disagrees with you and is trying to communicate with you about why.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2015
It's not a very good analogy. It's just funny, though.
I think the part that rings true is the "courage port," the pandering to the unreasonable. Not so much that tran.s is like a nail in the foot.
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
Less like stepping on a nail, more like sitting on some scissors.It's not a very good analogy. It's just funny, though.
I think the part that rings true is the "courage port," the pandering to the unreasonable. Not so much that tran.s is like a nail in the foot.
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2016
Tommy Tooter calls the Trans Lifeline. He's pissed at Nina for blowing him and one of his retarded friends off. Nina was digging for screencaps because he's a moron and talked to Tommy. Tommy decided to take a bunch of pills, get drunk and talk to the cops for 10 minutes in this video while talking to Nina and Nina dropped him. Tommy decided to make a video testing the Trans Lifeline for his people.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2015
Cow-to-cow combat is the best.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
The Ministry of Truth would like to remind everyone I didn't write the article because its poor service trolls tranny lolcows.
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2014
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2015
The camera is a weapon with this person.
TheFutureMrsMoon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2016
Probably put more thought into taking a gross bathroom pic for the facebooks than time spent answering phones on the hotline this past week.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
Why are articles from what are supposed to be legitimate journalistic sites marketing this joke of an LGBT helpline as something great?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2016
Because of the concept, not how it is executed. The concept is fine and it fits with the greater degree of acceptance transgender people have achieved in the past decade. There is nothing wrong with that, either. The problem with this line, as is the problem with a lot of other causes in other movements, is that a cause does not receive the degree of scrutiny it should get because people on the inside feel it is "theirs" and that people from the outside who attack it are doing so to hurt "them". So with a lack of scrutiny, they get lazy in how they administer the business. Eventually, those running the cause find small holes where they can benefit themselves. They aren't being watched by their community, their community actively protects them from being called out, so the problem gets worse. And worse. And eventually you have this. A charity where the owners enjoy prestige and take in a great deal of cash. I don't think Greta and Nina intended to do the things they do now, but I don't think they had the moral compass to prevent it, either. Running a non-profit is difficult on multiple levels, they're just too weak and stupid to prevent this all, and that's okay. What is not okay is to continue once it is abundantly clear you are too weak and stupid.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2016
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2016
It's also a typical example of the time honored non-profit scam: "We don't turn a profit because we pay ourselves unjustified salaries and/or buy assets for the charity that we use for our personal benefit."
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Because journalism itself is a joke populated by fuckups, drunks and lunatics who couldn't get real jobs.
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2016
Also, social connections we cannot directly see (goons helping goons, J-list, Cabalist, etc.)
Miles Prower
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2016
Greta will be a beautiful self-destruction. She is self-destructive by nature. I feel that the coming year will be alienation from the TG community, childbride coming to his senses and leaving and probably a bout of homelessness.