Culture Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say Climate Change Exists — Study

Source: IndieWire (archive)

Last month, non-profit group Good Energy launched what it called a Bechdel Test for Climate Change, a simple set of criteria designed to determine if it was clear climate change was present in a film. The real Allison Bechdel even endorsed it.

Good Energy, in launching its “Climate Reality Check,” said just three movies nominated for Oscars this year passed the test’s two simple rules: “Climate change exists” and “a character knows it.” Now in a more extensive study, the group analyzed 250 of the top grossing movies between 2013 and 2022.

Global warming has been with us for a while now, but only 12.8 percent — 32 of the 250 films studied in that time span — even passed the first criteria saying that climate change exists. Only 24 films, or 9.6 percent, passed both criteria of the test.

Good Energy and researchers at Colby College’s Buck Lab for Climate and Environment picked 25 films from each year between 2013 and 2022, looking at the total number of IMDB ratings to determine the most popular. They only looked at fictional films, not documentaries, and they filtered out any that weren’t set in the modern day or the near future, which includes films set after the year 2006, before the year 2100, and ones that are actually set on Earth. So no, Westerns, period pieces, and intergalactic sci-fis are excluded from needing characters to be aware of climate change.

Even a passing mention of terms like “climate change,” “global warming,” “the climate crisis,” or other environmental phrases were enough to qualify for inclusion, and not many cleared even that bar. The report mentions a conversation between Batman and Aquaman in “Justice League” in which Batman mentions “melting the polar ice caps” and “destroying the ecosystem.” In “Triangle of Sadness,” a climate mention isn’t even spoken, but it’s mentioned on an LED billboard when it reads: “THERE IS A NEW CLIMATE ENTERING THE WORLD…OF FASHION.”

In fact, only six of the 32 movies had three or more scenes in which climate change was mentioned.

Here are all the films, by year, that passed the Climate Bechdel Test:

  • 2013: “Pacific Rim”
  • 2014: “Kingsman: The Secret Service,” “The Amazing Spider-Man 2”
  • 2015: “Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials,” “Fantastic Four”
  • 2017: “Justice League,” “Happy Death Day”
  • 2018: “Venom,” “Aquaman”
  • 2019: “Midsommar,” “Marriage Story,” “Fast & Furious Presents: Hobbs & Shaw,” “Pokemon: Detective Pikachu”
  • 2020: “Tenet,” “The Hunt”
  • 2021: “Don’t Look Up,” “Zack Snyder’s Justice League,” “Eternals,” “Godzilla vs. Kong,” “The Tomorrow War,” “Wrath of Man”
  • 2022: “Glass Onion,” “Jurassic World Dominion,” “Triangle of Sadness”
The good news is that more movies over the last five years mentioned climate change than those released in the first half of the 2010s, and awareness in major films is rising.

“We turn to stories to find meaning, joy, beauty, and courage — and we desperately need to see our world reflected in the movies that we watch and love. For all of us, that world now includes the climate crisis,” Good Energy founder Anna Jane Joyner said in a statement. “Like the legendary Bechdel Test before it, the Climate Reality Check is designed to serve as both a creative tool and an invitation to investigate the presence of climate representation on-screen.”

Joyner says the data suggests films that pass the Climate Reality Check are more profitable than those that don’t, and Good Energy would like to see 50 percent of contemporary films pass the test by 2027.

“At this crucial moment in which the future of everything we love is at stake, storytelling can be a climate solution. But it can also obscure the reality of the situation we’re in,” said Matthew Schneider-Mayerson, PhD, associate professor of English and environmental studies at Colby College. “There’s a desperate need for studios, filmmakers, and writers to provide narratives that speak to our climate reality.”

Read the full report via Good Energy's website here.
 
image_2024-05-01_092811779.png
LMAO at this dude
 
You know, this is so great and important. I think we should make modern movies even better by including a land acknowledgement right after the previews are finished, first acknowledging the various people of the lands occupied by the film studio and locations where the film was shot, and then the people of the land occupied by the movie theater.

Only after these land acknowledgements should we be able to partake in the sublime machinations of whatever capeshit we're being fed this week.
 
Whan an astounding cunt. Way to sell out women. From "my sex isn't meaningfully represented" (out of two, cannot be blank) to "my political cause isn't represented" (out of millions).

(The thankful j*urno misspelled her name.)

When’s the last time you watched a new movie or played a AAA game? Are you part of the problem?
Rise of Palpatine: Pinata Edition, on Movie Night.

Yeah! Why didn't they mention the impending end of mankind in... *checks notes*

Toy Story 4!
It is no less insane to demand for a specific political cause to be represented in "serious" movies.
 
Well here we are.. The most battshit insane, utterly retarded thing i've read all week.

Do these ideologue nitwits even understand what entertainment functions as, is meant for? There must be no escape from the message, no escape from the derangement and anger. The classic leftists viewed things as a distraction from the anger needed for their revolution.. The modern progressive left seems to view it as an "education" (propaganda) opportunity.
 
Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say That AIDS Exists
Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say That The Holocaust Exists
Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say That Nuclear Weapons Exist
Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say That Pedophiles Exist
Only 32 of the Top Movies in the Last Decade Say That The Heat Death Of The Universe Exists
 
Bechdel Test
Whoever invented or invokes this test should be subjugated to an eternity in hell listening to women speaking.

On one hand there is at least logic to "women can speak of something other than men", but on the other hand it's the same retarded logic that a film should waste time just to tick a checklist for some retarded wokester.
 
I spent most of last night at a party I didn’t want to be at being told off by an academic (not a climate researcher, some kind of fairly influential policy wonk) who was insisting that climate change was the biggest threat to humanity and we must all embrace the entire pod lifestyle to stop it and have zero carbon. I disagreed and said I found the level of control needed to enforce less travel and the bug lifestyle be horrific. 15 minute cities were mentioned. I said they were bloody awful too. Apparently i misunderstood the idea - which is funny because i was able to explain the pie wedges in Oxford and the sheer insanity of it fairly efficiently.
But apparently we must go totally to zero carbon
Ok, I said ‘why don’t we just build more nukes?’ And I swear she almost lost it. I think she was mainly surprised at someone just disagreeing to be honest. She kept spluttering as though it was heresy.
Apparently it takes too long, and ‘that’s not the point.’
It can’t be safe, she said
What about thorium reactors? I said.
There was some shouting. No nukes. Only renewables. But that’s going to put us to the mad max ending, I said. It’s insane.
I asked what caused the Medieval warm period and pointed out that the romans used to grow grapes where we were stood. That didn’t go down very well.
What struck me was the total adherence to the idea, and the jargon. All the same jargon the news uses, and absolutely no ability to discuss any of the science or issues behind it. Just appeals to think of the children (I am, I want them to live freely and not in a pod) and talk of the patriarchy (perhaps they give off a lot of heat?)
Anyway, if I want to be lectured about climate change, I can do it for free, I’m not paying for it and buying popcorn as well.
 
I mean... they can, and they have.
Not really.

Stories are arguments. Arguments about the way people behave and about the way the world is or should be. Shitty stories fail and can't get the viewer to suspend their disbelief because they either do a poor job of arguing for their views or because the viewpoints they present are flawed.

Plenty of people will say programming from The Electric Jew is why opposition to gay marriage disappeared, but the truth is the arguments against gay marriage were never very good in the first place. Media stories made arguments that gays are ultimately people who are pretty normal aside from being hypersexual ass pirates, and that made sense to viewers because it's true. And they saw the truth of the gay people they knew in real life, and they decided muh Jesus wasn't a good enough argument against letting gays be as miserable as the rest of us.

You'll notice the tranny bullshit in media has not really worked. That's because everyone can see that trannies are delusional and overbearing weirdos, and so the shitty stories being told about them in media fail on multiple levels. They're not just poorly told by the diversity hire writers, but their arguments are ridiculous.

I'm not saying propaganda isn't a real threat (look at how All in the Family refrained the xenophobic, racist, ignorant Democrat union worker as a rightwing phenomenon), but you can't just input instructions and get the results out of the populace that you want. But shitlibs really do believe that you can.
 
All movies need to be legally required to have a 3 hour segment at the beginning of the movie consisting of characters acknowledging every social, political, and environmental issues also basic health, common sense and hygiene. Some important topics.
  • Murder is bad
  • You need to wash your hands after taking a shit
  • Sri Lanka is in a bad economic state
  • Racism is bad
  • Shitting in the streets is only ok if your Indian(cultural appropriation)
Producers can do this in several unique forms such as a long conversation between characters or even just the character sitting down staring at the camera and instructing the audience.

This will be great for movies 😃
 
but the truth is the arguments against gay marriage were never very good in the first place.

Yeah, like the retarded argument that after legalizing gay marriag, they'll start sending cross-dressing pedophiles to your kids' school to propagandize them about the gay lifestyle, or that before you know it, the gays would be demanding you celebrate their lifestyle at work, or that they'd start normalizing public fetish displays, or that next, they'd move on to making you say that a pervert in a dress is actually a woman. It turns out that homosexuals are totally normal people who just want a tax deduction, take zero interest in your kids, and definitely don't want to march down the street while waving dildos.

Thank God none of that stuff happened. What a bunch of silly dum-dums!
 
Back