Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
No, I think it means that Hardin has to apply to be a wartime consiglieri, and that the pipsqueak sleeps with the fishes.

Excerpt from Russ' next submission:
It ain't the way I wanted it! I can handle things! I'm smart! Not like everybody says... like dumb... I'm smart and I want respect!
Russ's hooker fixation and crusade is going to someday run him afoul of some bad people. Although I think they are more likely to drive him out to the desert to feed the ants?
 
Russ's hooker fixation and crusade is going to someday run him afoul of some bad people. Although I think they are more likely to drive him out to the desert to feed the ants?
>Sketchy men tell Russell that they want him to buy into their brothel operation and offer to show him the place, driving him out into the desert
>When they arrive at the secluded spot in the desert they show him a Lego replica of the Sneed's Feed and Seed building (formerly Chuck's) next to a big ass fire ant nest
"WHAT IS THIS? A BROTHEL FOR ANTS!?"
"Nah, fuckface. More like a buffet."
 
Last edited:
"Floridia", lol
I like to imagine this was the Utah Courts way of making fun of Florida for needing a notice of transfer. Those FLOR-ID-IANS are a little slow make sure you tell them everything that is happening twice to be sure they get it.

Probably not true and someone was just typing quickly.
 
I like to imagine this was the Utah Courts way of making fun of Florida for needing a notice of transfer. Those FLOR-ID-IANS are a little slow make sure you tell them everything that is happening twice to be sure they get it.

Probably not true and someone was just typing quickly.
My sister in law is from the Carolina Appalachians, and she has to noticeably keep herself from referring to Floridians as Floridiots as they cause a great number of accidents as they flock to the mountains for vacation.
 
Russ already got what, 80 out of the 90 day stay he wanted? And remember, he only needed 60 but wanted 90 just to be safe
One legitimate case strategy would be to give Russ enough rope to hang himself with, on this one. In about ten days, there’s likely going to be another hammering of filings that Russ got all the time he wanted, does not need additional relief from the Court, and if he still can’t get his act together, his case should be DWOP’d.
 
One legitimate case strategy would be to give Russ enough rope to hang himself with, on this one. In about ten days, there’s likely going to be another hammering of filings that Russ got all the time he wanted, does not need additional relief from the Court, and if he still can’t get his act together, his case should be DWOP’d.
And it should be with prejudice to prevent this ratfaced retard from just doing it again.
 
And it should be with prejudice to prevent this ratfaced retard from just doing it again.
"It is our determination that this case is farsical and is hereby stricken from the docket while the Plaintiff is ordered held in a Canadian prison until such time as the Earth freezes over. Plaintiff is literally too retarded to understand that sex workers are only after money and can't be trusted with anything sharper than a wedge of cheese and thus is a danger to himself, others, and the collective sanity of the human race."
 
Thing is, once Clarence and crew pass on it, at least it should make Hardin attempt to kick-start the Florida court again.

Course they'll probably reach into the pot of gold thst is this case and pull out a handful of shit.

But even that has some funny in it.

Neither man nor the gods will deny me my milk.
 
I believe the court will say this is a waste of our time.
everything will be ignored.
The only thing interest I think SCOTUS will rule on is why this case is alive
which was the retroactively -DMCA/(pro-bono -lawyer kunfu).
Weirdly, the appellate court seemed to draw the conclusion backwards: There was infringement -> Russ sent an email -> Null posted the email -> there was additional infringement -> Russ sent DMCA -> Null posted it and mocked it -> Null knew that his audience hated Greer -> therefore Null is responsible retroactively for infringement that happened before his supposed encouragement. Both Russ and the Appellate court assert that there have been additional infringements since the DMCA, but it was for things not at issue here, meaning that the infringement applied retroactively
.
 
I believe the court will say this is a waste of our time.
everything will be ignored.
The only thing interest I think SCOTUS will rule on is why this case is alive
which was the retroactively -DMCA/(pro-bono -lawyer kunfu).

.
It is possible (slim but possible) they take it. The Colorado gay cake case made it to SCOTUS and they made a narrow ruling to make sure it wouldn't be used as a precedent. IIRC it was more about Colorado fucking up procedure rather than being a case about freedom of speech. Which in some respects is similar to the case here. It isnt as much about the DMCA as it is the lower court fucking up.
 
"Tonight, you."
slobanana.png
russell brutananadilewski.png
"Hehe, whatch do you think he meansh... "tchonight, you'?"
 
Back