Artcow Shaddai Prejean / Shädman / Shadman / Shädbase / Shad / TheShadling - Pedophile Web Artist. Edgelord. Alleged Heroin Addict. Drew Porn of His Mother. Charged with Assault with a Deadly Weapon. Legally a "Menace to Society" in Switzerland. TAKE IT EZ BABE!!!

[SwanSwanson]

You can't escape invoking Mutt's Law by just implying at it.

I was implying prison sex and the first thing that comes to your mind is... nevermind.

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

If shadman does end up imprisoned what are the odds that he... you know..

Low. Not because someone wouldn't want to, but because its not rape when its with the willing. With how fucked up half the shit he's drawn is, its really not a stretch to believe that a prison buttfuck would be on the bucket list.

 

[Shadfan666xxx000]

Look, you are either an actual childporn hoarder or you weren't around or have no idea what the "old school" internet was like.

The wild west was fun, but for fuck sakes dudes like Shad were a dime a dozen and were no different from dudes in middle school drawing Powerpuff girls or Jetsons porn because he was "being edgy." His shit sucks and is gay and anyone trying to crawl on his hill should crawl into a burning building to molest a child dying of carbon monoxide poisoning and then die in the hallway only to be stepped over by real humans. In the old days stupid freaks defending or doing this would be harassed into oblivion, and if you weren't then even the hint of some one pointing out that you were a cancer to society would make you fear sharing shit ass, pedophilia opinions so much so thay you'd make a switch in providers and/or shut the fuck up.

I'm so sick of this "old internet" comment from retards who are just breaking 30, at most. You're a porno deranged freak who probably has more CP on your computer than a Vice News writer.

I'm sick of you faggots trying to defend him. He's shit, you're shit, and his artwork is the worst of the worst Newgrounds and "early internet" pumped out. We get it, "back then we did what we wanted." And that was fun. But back then there were also disgusting, baby fucking freaks who were all "but muh rights." Have the right all you want, face the wall while we plant a bullet in the back of your fuckin skull.

Sorry for the spergerburger but my brother-in-Christ, just hang yourself off of one of the edges your carved out of your angsty, porn-riddled middle-school experience already. "Dude, it's just a drawing," dude, we don't care. Kill yourself.

But what if I kill myself and come back as a ghost? Then I start sending you the freaky shit from my ghost phone from beyond the grave like a stupid comic book villain? You'll really regret telling me to kill myself then.

 

[The Tall Man]

The fact that some reason he puts even the Kiwis pennies in A twist shows that some people don't take the free speech absolutism to its logical conclusion I mean I don't believe in free speech absolutism and I believe most of the stuff you draw should be banned he's consistent in being an Internet edge Lloyd

There is your problem.
I believe in free speech absolutism and I also believe in stomping peoples heads in.
If you implement both, pedos vanish from your free speech discussion.

 

[AnOminous]

There is your problem.
I believe in free speech absolutism and I also believe in stomping peoples heads in.
If you implement both, pedos vanish from your free speech discussion.

Free speech is generally protected from GOVERNMENT interference. If you walk up to someone and start talking mad shit at them and get punched in the face, that may be illegal, that may deserve criminal sanctions, but I may not have much sympathy for you depending on what specific mad shit you said.

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

Free speech is generally protected from GOVERNMENT interference. If you walk up to someone and start talking mad shit at them and get punched in the face, that may be illegal, that may deserve criminal sanctions, but I may not have much sympathy for you depending on what specific mad shit you said.

Yep, but the position of the free speech absolutist is generally that the government needs to go beyond simply not being allowed to punish you as a government for speech, and to proactively guarantee speech in other means and venues outside the government, such as the press, or these days the internet.

Personally, I see it as a feel-good argument like UBI, where if you accept for arguments sake that it'll work as advertised, great, but reality is rarely so kind. It tends to fall apart when in contact with the rest of the social structure - Laws are not behavior, and laws are universally a reactive and not proactive thing. Ain't never seen murder law prevent a trigger from being pulled, ain't never seen a free speech law proposal that can prevent people from ostracizing a retard.

As far as Shad goes? I'm all for free speech of fiction, but when you go from drawing fictional loli to drawing actual children, that lines crossed and you can get fucked.

 

[AnOminous]

Yep, but the position of the free speech absolutist is generally that the government needs to go beyond simply not being allowed to punish you as a government for speech, and to proactively guarantee speech in other means and venues outside the government, such as the press, or these days the internet.

I disagree with that, because there are no situations where government involvement actually increases freedom. The government pretty much needs to fuck off out of the freedom thing. Freedom means the government fucks off out of that particular area.

 

[The Tall Man]

Yep, but the position of the free speech absolutist is generally that the government needs to go beyond simply not being allowed to punish you as a government for speech, and to proactively guarantee speech in other means and venues outside the government, such as the press, or these days the internet.

Personally, I see it as a feel-good argument like UBI, where if you accept for arguments sake that it'll work as advertised, great, but reality is rarely so kind. It tends to fall apart when in contact with the rest of the social structure - Laws are not behavior, and laws are universally a reactive and not proactive thing. Ain't never seen murder law prevent a trigger from being pulled, ain't never seen a free speech law proposal that can prevent people from ostracizing a retard.

As far as Shad goes? I'm all for free speech of fiction, but when you go from drawing fictional loli to drawing actual children, that lines crossed and you can get fucked.

"I don't see free speech absolutism as solely a legal matter; it means I am all for people saying whatever they want. There should be no rules on speech at all.
If some pedo wants to draw and share pornographic materials with his Discord server, I don't care that he does that.
The pictures themselves hold no power to a normal person; they're disgusting and that's it.
What is great about allowing free speech for pedos while allowing lynching is that everyone knows that would reduce the pedo problem.
Let him openly and proudly show he is a pedo, and let the people lynch him.
Get the grubby fingers of the law out of the way of lynching would make the world a better place.
See how the conundrum of free speech absolutism and pedophilic material works itself out naturally by allowing lynching.

I guess I am a pro lynching kinda guy.

With rigid rules sneaky people can always dabble in the grey areas.
There is no argument that will convince a dad with his trusty noose that the loli picture is actually a 1000 year old dragon.

 

[dick brain]

I disagree with that, because there are no situations where government involvement actually increases freedom.

What about net neutrality? Or other antitrust/racketeering laws?

 

[Kuritan Deplorable]

I guess I am a pro lynching kinda guy.

If you wanted to doll it up in a more acceptable manner, you believe in a distinction between legal consequences and social consequences, and feel those social consequences should be more aggressive when warranted, because they're incredibly cucked right now. But I can agree with the sentiment.

There is no argument that will convince a dad with his trusty noose that the loli picture is actually a 1000 year old dragon.

Especially when the guys out trying to shove it in your childrens face - meanwhile he'd probably just keep the kids away from you if he saw it in passing through your window, but you were pretty normal otherwise. Folks are too comfortable bringing their weird shit into the real world - I'm still baffled by half the stuff people will retweet on social media under their own name and selfie.

I disagree with that, because there are no situations where government involvement actually increases freedom. The government pretty much needs to fuck off out of the freedom thing. Freedom means the government fucks off out of that particular area.

Totally correct, which is why I said it doesn't work nearly as well as people wish when put into practice. But its part of the two sides of the coin Tall Man is mentioning - Where the law fails, people should be stepping in. And we do still see it from time to time, and it works when it happens.

Freedom is taken, not given, so until people actually start doing shit about stuff, the legal half will continue to be an important half.

 

[Trombonista]

Low. Not because someone wouldn't want to, but because its not rape when its with the willing. With how fucked up half the shit he's drawn is, its really not a stretch to believe that a prison buttfuck would be on the bucket list.

I think he'd actually be the penetrator.

 

[dick brain]

I think he'd actually be the penetrator.

Have you seen him?

 

[Noebel]

I guess I am a pro lynching kinda guy.

Problem with this is that people are really bad at moderation when mass lynchings are on the menu. Shit is addictive and has a certain momentum to it. Just look at the French Revolution. They've decapitated counter-revolutionary and monarchist elements, then they started killing random people using shoddy snitching as an excuse, and then they ended up in a competition of who'd decapitate everyone else first out of self-preservation concerns. If you think implementing such system won't backfire at you someday, you're delusional.

 

[Fruity]

I think he'd actually be the penetrator.

I don't see it. With those arms and that hair he's all ready for a definitely not gay guy to hit it from the back. All they have to do is squint and pretend he's a really ugly Indian girl.

Never surprises me how many times this thread devolves into debating the ethics of free speech and loli and shit. Personally I think if it's all fictional then be as degenerate as you want but you have to be retarded to think you won't get pushback when you start involving real people or make it your entire identity. Doesn't matter if that's drawing characters based on real actresses, admitting shit like "I wanna fuck Dafne Keen" or when all your art caters specifically to being shocking and edgy. You have to be literally mentally retarded to not shut the fuck up at that point. It's like all the Twitter lolicons who are shocked and appalled when some normie thinks they're a pedo for tweeting 24/7 about how they want to inseminate anime children.

 

[Wonathan Joss]

Every time I visit this board, I'm fucking disappointed that the hammer of justice hasn't blighted him yet.
At least most of the Sleepycast people don't follow him on Twitter these days... That's something, I guess

 

[Caligura]

Every time I visit this board, I'm fucking disappointed that the hammer of justice hasn't blighted him yet.
At least most of the Sleepycast people don't follow him on Twitter these days... That's something, I guess

I guess his current fate of being a glorified Belle Delphine fanart mill is something of a purgatory for him at the moment. That's literally all he does these days as it seems.

 

[onemanarmylol]

View attachment 5954412View attachment 5954413

I don't see it. With those arms and that hair he's all ready for a definitely not gay guy to hit it from the back. All they have to do is squint and pretend he's a really ugly Indian girl.

Never surprises me how many times this thread devolves into debating the ethics of free speech and loli and shit. Personally I think if it's all fictional then be as degenerate as you want but you have to be retarded to think you won't get pushback when you start involving real people or make it your entire identity. Doesn't matter if that's drawing characters based on real actresses, admitting shit like "I wanna fuck Dafne Keen" or when all your art caters specifically to being shocking and edgy. You have to be literally mentally retarded to not shut the fuck up at that point. It's like all the Twitter lolicons who are shocked and appalled when some normie thinks they're a pedo for tweeting 24/7 about how they want to inseminate anime children.

One question i have to this day is if shadman is a jeet hes gotta be.

 

[Trombonista]

One question i have to this day is if shadman is a jeet hes gotta be.

Did you even read the thread? He's half-black.

 

[onemanarmylol]

Did you even read the thread? He's half-black.

Nah i missed that one, but thanks for clarifying.

 

[astrohairlip]

Problem with this is that people are really bad at moderation when mass lynchings are on the menu. Shit is addictive and has a certain momentum to it. Just look at the French Revolution. They've decapitated counter-revolutionary and monarchist elements, then they started killing random people using shoddy snitching as an excuse, and then they ended up in a competition of who'd decapitate everyone else first out of self-preservation concerns. If you think implementing such system won't backfire at you someday, you're delusional.

As a fellow pro-lynching kinda guy, I think it's definitely important to employ caution. You should probably not lynch someone unless you're willing to risk getting lynched yourself. That said, not every scenario like that threatens to boil over into the guillotine game. Pedophiles are a societal ill and a danger to children, and most people who aren't pedophiles understand that. I wouldn't advocate lynching someone who saw a post-pubescent but underaged girl and thought she was attractive, but I'd definitely get suspicious of them if they made a habit of sharing opinions like that openly and repeatedly, as those types think they're clever and seek out like-minded creeps. Once someone signals they have some predatory inclination toward children, I think a lynching is definitely in order, and I don't think there's much risk of it turning into a wide problem based on that alone. When that happens, it's usually the symptom of some larger cause allowing it to happen, as was the case with the French Revolution.