Opinion Why women would prefer to be alone in the woods with a bear than a man

Link (Archive)

Why women would prefer to be alone in the woods with a bear than a man​

Would you rather find yourself alone in the woods with a bear or a man? This is the question currently dividing social media. Based on the responses online, it looks like most women answering the question say they would choose the bear, a decision that is shocking many men.

The reactions show some men don’t understand women’s experiences. The assertion that women would prefer to encounter a bear is based on evidence about the rate of male violence against women, and on a lifetime of learning to fear and anticipate this violence. This is especially true of sexual violence, something which would not be associated with encountering a bear.

According to the World Health Organization, one in three women – around 736 million globally – will have experienced sexual or physical violence by an intimate partner or sexual violence from a non-partner in their lifetime. This figure has largely remained unchanged over the past decade.

Being attacked by a bear is much less common, with only 664 attacks worldwideover 15 years, and very few fatal attacks. And bears tend to avoid humans, attacking only when provoked or protecting their young.


This is not about generalising or fearing all men. Women know that not all men are dangerous. But women don’t know which men they should fear, only that male violence and male entitlement to women’s bodies is something that they have to be on guard for.

Women are commonly victims of sexualised violence, and men are overwhelmingly the perpetrators (including against other men). There are enough men who have hurt or are capable of hurting women, and women have no way of knowing which ones these are. While much violence against women comes from men they know, the risk of danger from men they don’t know is something that informs their day-to-day lives.

For example, research shows that women change their behaviour – making certain decisions about the routes they take or what they wear – to avoid harassment or abuse from men in public. Scholars such as Fiona Vera-Gray refer to this as safety work.

Women’s view of men is also coloured by their non-violent actions that harm women. Clearly, bears also do not contribute to or uphold systemic sexism and misogyny, but most men do.

My research on misogynistic online groups has explored how men engage in acts against women that reinforce gender inequality.

Writer Emma Pitman has described this phenomenon using the analogy of a human pyramid. The choices of some men to stay silent about abuse is the base of the pyramid, holding up other men who engage in misogynistic jokes or commit violence.

The overall effect, whether deliberate or via ignorance or indifference, is to normalise and support the actions of male sexual predators and domestic abuse perpetrators.

This culture props up the men who are silent bystanders, observing sexism, harassment or abuse but doing nothing, the men who make or laugh along with the sexist or rape jokes, those who are rape apologists and blame women for their sexual victimisation, those who become aggressive when women turn them down, those who stalk, control and abuse women, and those who are rapists, sexual harassers and murderers. This continuum of misogyny is women’s everyday reality – and at no point do bears feature.

Men on the defensive​

Men are generally surprised, defensive even, when the subject of male violence against women is discussed. This is often where people invoke the response “not all men”.

When women took to social media to express their anger and devastation following the murder of Sarah Everard by a police officer in 2021, #NotAllMen trended online. Meanwhile, police advised womennot to walk alone at night, placing the burden of avoiding violence on women.

This conversation is about privilege, and not recognising it. Many men are able to move through their daily lives not being worried that they are going to be attacked or raped, can walk alone late at night without taking any safety precautions or even not having such thoughts cross their minds, and do not feel their hearts beat faster if they hear footsteps behind them. It may not be all men, but it is all women, who live smaller lives because of the threat of some men’s violence.

These discussions are an opportunity for men to understand women’s genuine fears and to be part of the solution rather than the problem.
 
To generate outrage clicks and sow discord among people. In my opinion, if the original asker of this question was honest then they would have substituted "bear" with "man eating bloodthirsty tiger" which would simplify the question to "would you rather be killed, or be raped and then possibly killed". I don't think it's any more complex than that.
Or maybe it's like you said and it was intended to have many variables such as species of bear (and human) but I get the feeling it was supposed to be simple.
tbf, a man eating a bloodthirsty tiger would be quite an intimidating bloke.
 
The reactions show some men don’t understand women’s experiences.
How the women surveyed think an encounter with a bear is likely to go:
1715024598437.png
 
Yeah, yeah, and we never put the toilet seat down either. I didn't even bother reading this one, I'm that sick of this shit. Look love, you realistically have nothing to worry about, most guys are going MGTOW at this point, whether they personally identify with that label or not. All this time you've been telling us men are trash and now the trash is taking itself out. Congratulations, you won.
 
It's a pretty stupid hypothetical. I live in an area with a large bear population. When I go to the store, I don't have to decide between the store full of people and its competitor which is staffed by bears. It's just generally not a choice people have to make.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wendell X
This just sounds like hysterics too me and i cant believe it blew up like it did.

"I'm safer with a bear than with a man!"

"That's stupid and here's why"

"YOU'RE FANTASIZING ABOUT ME GETTING RIPPED APART BY BEARS WHICH PROVES MY POINT!"

All this says to me is that these women have been very sheltered throughout their life
Its so ridiculous. Especially since the question is so non specific. It just says you are either stuck with a man or bear, pick one. The bear is always hostile. It will kill and eat you. The man? He could be a murder rape hobo, or Bob from accounting that hasn't even been pulled over for a speeding ticket. Personally i'd take the coin flip over death.
 
It doesn't even specify the species of bear. I'd guess you'd be pretty safe with a panda.
Pandas are pretty stupid, but they're heavy. If they decided to 'play' with you, and hit you, you would die. In general I don't want to fuck with bears or wildlife in general. I was a Boy Scout. You ever see a moose up close? They are mean and those horns are sharp. Piss them off and the only thing that will save you is a rifle. That's wild animals in general. They aren't pets, they see us as food or something to chew on, play with.
 
Had a friend who was stationed up in Fairbanks Alaska; and no lie, one of their common talking points was "Moose aren't afraid of anything less than a V8. They will attack your vehicle if they want to."
He's completely right. Doubly so if they have kids. They will defend their young to the point of suicide. Do not fuck with moose unless you have a 300 win mag or a 45-70 in your arms. Bears are mostly the same, just with teeth.
 
Luckily never encountered a bear and never did stuff in Moose territory; worst I ever experienced was went hunting with some friends, it's night, but we bagged an Elk, and a fucking mountain lion stalked us all the way back to our vehicle. It didn't attack, but it followed us for about 3 miles and the entire time we're just trying to be cool, because we can't shoot unless in self-defense, and being stalked isn't a sufficient threat.
 
Luckily never encountered a bear and never did stuff in Moose territory; worst I ever experienced was went hunting with some friends, it's night, but we bagged an Elk, and a fucking mountain lion stalked us all the way back to our vehicle. It didn't attack, but it followed us for about 3 miles and the entire time we're just trying to be cool, because we can't shoot unless in self-defense, and being stalked isn't a sufficient threat.
Ignoring and walking away calmly is about all you can do if you can't shoot. Theyll chase if you run. Glad you got home safe man.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ._.
This whole thing sounds like a Zach Hadel hypothetical.
Just personal experience; a lot of female hypotheticals are made to drive wedges between people, there is no right answer, she's looking for a fight. Even if your girl isn't coming up with it herself, girls see others doing this shit and will decide to do it. I'm almost half-cocked to say there's a shadowy hand pushing this kind of shit to keep people separate and depressed, because a strong union/family unit is harder to destroy; so they use shit like this to get men and women to yell at each other. Especially with how many feminist talking point fingerprints are all over this shit-show. The loudest voices scream they know the bear is death, they're using it as a talking point to discuss why men are so bad. Have you tried carrying a gun to stop bad men from violating you? No, because men need to be shamed/be better/whatever. I'm not gonna say I'm a fucking big brain, but I see this shit as psychological programming; for women to say men are violent and untrustworthy and men to call women retarded little whores.
 
Last edited:
Back