SJW Art and Extremes

[Idiot Sandwich the 3rd]

[edit]

Im sorry for the double posting. I'm on mobile and I guess my post got duped

 

[Willi Tokarev]

Tatar poon art. I also recall her having a NSFW page with hideous giant overdetailed spike penis monsters (those were commisioned pieces, but still)

Spoiler: The art

Spoiler: The artist

 

[NaggotFigger]

I am sorry, but the deranged tranny sickfuckery must continue before I cleanse everything. Allah save us all.

Spoiler: Haram

 

[Biology Book]

Spoiler: Dragon ball

Spoiler: Bnha

Spoiler: Baki

Spoiler: Kuroko no Basket

Spoiler: Saiki K

Spoiler: Jojo

 

[Cave Fisher]

I am sorry, but the deranged tranny sickfuckery must continue before I cleanse everything. Allah save us all.

Most of this is horrifying, but that Promare one is pretty fucking sick, even if the characters are built nothing like that in the actual series, I really like the Panty and Stocking-like artystyle.

 

[Chromeo]

View attachment 5962843

"Physical traits that I find beautiful" press X to doubt! Motherfucker you draw ugly people with giant shnozzes because it makes you look progressive. Nobody buys for a second you actually think that's attractive/beautiful. Then even if you did, LMAO you can't take criticism. Shut the hell your mouth.

 

[RX-78]

Tatar poon art. I also recall her having a NSFW page with hideous giant overdetailed spike penis monsters (those were commisioned pieces, but still)

Spoiler: The art

View attachment 5962837View attachment 5962839View attachment 5962840View attachment 5962841View attachment 5962844

Spoiler: The artist

View attachment 5962833View attachment 5962835View attachment 5962832View attachment 5962849View attachment 5962846View attachment 5962843View attachment 5962848View attachment 5962847

It's appropriate that the faggot who looks like a cartoon character has an art style that's sickeningly close to AI.

 

[didelphigina]

I'm sure there's someone that has pointed this out, but something I tend to notice when seeing this thread is that tranny artists are so easily clockable by their art styles. I don't know exactly what it is but men and women tend to draw in very specific artstyles. There's so many instances where I see a piece of artwork, I click on the artist's profiles and Im always correct about not only them being a tranny, but also guess exactly if it is a troon or a poon.

If there's one thing I learned;

If you see a very stylistic art style or one with bright colors and "goober" faces for example, especially on Tumblr or Twitter, always expect at least 85% of the time to be drawn by a trans person. Very rare exceptions. Heck, I've seen many signs that I could make a thread about it on Stinkditch. But again, we have this thread to showcase such junk, so, lol.

 

[Ampicilina500mg]

I am sorry, but the deranged tranny sickfuckery must continue before I cleanse everything. Allah save us all.

Spoiler: Haram

undefined

Jesse Pinkman is transphobic, bitch

Spoiler: Kuroko no Basket

>basketball players
>they are all black.

 

[Kiwilurk]

Spoiler: Small splatoon dump.

People have this weird obsession with making Shiver and fried weird shark and eel hybrids respectively.
It can look good, but these people do everything they can to make that not happen.

You know someone sucks at adding dialogue when they HAVE TO ADD NUMBERS each speech bubble.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Remember that "hot take" of "sexualized" fictional characters "not being able to consent"? I think that "woke" BS is spreading more.

Also, I think a SJW "argument" against the common sense debunking of that BS is that "consent" in fiction can be revoked on a whim by a creator. If that is the case, that is BS, as fiction -- unlike reality -- can have different stories, and of course people can make "headcanons" that differ from the "canon" of a fiction. And just because a creator can do such a thing, doesn't mean he or she would.

Fictional characters are fiction, so if one can create a fiction wherein a character is an actual person with a defined personality in the first place, then one can create a fiction where they like being "sexualized" as well. Also not everything is rape.

 

[Mike Meekins]

Spoiler: Blatant attention seeking. Totes not a fetish

Spoiler: Even more MLP gijinka drama

I actually like these. I think they're pretty cute, but why do they always insist on making Fluttershy both trans and a muslim? I think it's funny how she's surprised that she's being called a racist over this. Why are you surprised? She had all of these other characters to make trans but chose the muslim. Oh gee, i wonder why?

Spoiler: Spunchbop

Gaping tit wounds aside, what's with the veins on his belly

They actually made the mastectomy scars look subtle for once? IMPOSSIBLE

 

[Lesbian Grandma]

Gaping tit wounds aside, what's with the veins on his belly

Stretch marks

Thread tax:

 

[RX-78]

Remember that "hot take" of "sexualized" fictional characters "not being able to consent"? I think that "woke" BS is spreading more.

Also, I think a SJW "argument" against the common sense debunking of that BS is that "consent" in fiction can be revoked on a whim by a creator. If that is the case, that is BS, as fiction -- unlike reality -- can have different stories, and of course people can make "headcanons" that differ from the "canon" of a fiction. And just because a creator can do such a thing, doesn't mean he or she would.

The 2D rights brigade keeps asserting itself as the most autistic branch of wokism, because only something on the same spectrum as chris would believe in this Roger Rabbit schizo shit. One fun way to spin it is saying that headcanons, consent revoking, and the zippertits are a form of gaslighting/slavery. The drawing is supposed to have the same rights as a person, so making desicions for them is literally facism.

 

[Marquis de Cow]

Gaping tit wounds aside, what's with the veins on his belly

Those are stretch marks

 

[Kiwilurk]

The 2D rights brigade keeps asserting itself as the most autistic branch of wokism, because only something on the same spectrum as chris would believe in this Roger Rabbit schizo shit. One fun way to spin it is saying that headcanons, consent revoking, and the zippertits are a form of gaslighting/slavery. The drawing is supposed to have the same rights as a person, so making desicions for them is literally facism.

They'll come up with some Olympic level mental gymnastics that boil down to "rules for thee not for me"

Tread tax:

Looks a hell of a lot closer to how you draw her.

 

[SomeSpook]

View attachment 5969282
Looks a hell of a lot closer to how you draw her.
View attachment 5969283

I hate to say it, but I greatly enjoy the bottom image.

 

[Idiot Sandwich the 3rd]

If there's one thing I learned;

If you see a very stylistic art style or one with bright colors and "goober" faces for example, especially on Tumblr or Twitter, always expect at least 85% of the time to be drawn by a trans person. Very rare exceptions. Heck, I've seen many signs that I could make a thread about it on Stinkditch. But again, we have this thread to showcase such junk, so, lol.

true, and it is always blatantly obvious if the artist is a tif or a tim. Im not saying to make a new thread, i know thats what this one is for btw, just thought it was an interesting subject and i really wanted to get it out there

anyways here's some more stuff for this thread

Spoiler: Friday Night Funkin was a mistake

 

[ToroidalBoat]

The 2D rights brigade keeps asserting itself as the most autistic branch of wokism, because only something on the same spectrum as chris would believe in this Roger Rabbit schizo shit.

One of -- if not the -- main theme of "social justice" is making up new problems where there were none before, or being "woke" to them. This "fictional characters cannot consent" BS was likely not a thing about 10 years ago. And certainly wasn't a thing 20 years ago, among the "politically correct" predecessors of the SJWs before Current Year. So who knows how autistic, "Chris Chan"-ish, and downright insane SJWs will be about fictional characters 10 years from now, assuming it's still Current Year then?

 

[RX-78]

They'll come up with some Olympic level mental gymnastics that boil down to "rules for thee not for me"

Doubtlessly, its the only exercise xheiy ever get.

I hate to say it, but I greatly enjoy the bottom image.

I'd agree if the artist knew how to draw a mouth and nose. I though Marina's smile was a drooping wart at first.

One of -- if not the -- main theme of "social justice" is making up new problems where there were none before, or being "woke" to them. This "fictional characters cannot consent" BS was likely not a thing about 10 years ago. And certainly wasn't a thing 20 years ago, among the "politically correct" predecessors of the SJWs before Current Year. So who knows how autistic, "Chris Chan"-ish, and downright insane SJWs will be about fictional characters 10 years from now, assuming it's still Current Year then?

By that point I'm hoping the woke become what the spinsters of the late 19th century were, the type of failed person whose only utility in society is simple labor and to serve as an example to children of how not to live their lives.