Harems?

Fam I got so many baes it's basically a harem. I always have my dick out for my harem-baes.

AnOminous said:
There is also a countervailing principle that if people prefer to do something, they should be allowed to do it even if it is absolutely certain that it will make them unhappy. Some people prefer not to be happy.
Click to expand...

A prime example of such a person is everyone's favorite potato-human hybrid Philip Haskins-Delici
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Ravelord, Marvin and WireSponge
It's good when you have more women than men and one really rich dude in the community, but otherwise it's not really a viable solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ICametoLurk
Functional Animal said:
Fam I got so many baes it's basically a harem. I always have my dick out for my harem-baes.



A prime example of such a person is everyone's favorite potato-human hybrid Philip Haskins-Delici
Click to expand...

Well, his preferences don't matter. He should be julienned and deep fried.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuskEngine and Marvin
If there's consent involved, sure. I think historically it served a function that allowed women to get more support, so that's good.
 
Still if you actually read the accounts of the harems of the Middle East and Asia, you will be sickened. There was a lot of "mysterious" deaths of fellow concubines and their sons.

For some reason it was imperative to be a mother of a son.

The one man/one woman model is probably the best for the procreation and begetting of chidlren.
 
It's a cool concept for animu and such, because what guy doesn't want 10 different girls to be all over him all the time? You have a fight with one, you've got 9 others just waiting to fondle your dongle.

That being said, trying to emulate your favorite harem fantasy animu IRL is a recipe for disaster.
 
Tisn Tuianous said:
In paper/fiction: Sounds nice

In reality: Not much feasible. (At most you'll get a FFFM foursome for a harem.)
Click to expand...


Yep. It's basically the ultimate in male fantasy. Who wouldn't want a a room full of gorgeous women to have sex with at your discretion? Again, this only works as a fantasy. When you take into consideration these women are people with feelings, that's where it all fucks up
 
I used to have a harem until @DNJACK started tracking them down and doxing them. Now I'm happily married in a monogamous relationship.
 
Funny what people would stop doing to stay alive...
 
Keeping more than one jealous creatures in your household unnecessarily complicate things - and God bless you when junior jealous creatures pop out.

Polygamy is only appealing if you can keep separate households and can be sure they never realize the existence of the others.
 
Last edited:
Cryin RN said:
This paper says pretty much everything that needs to be said about it.

State-endorsed polygamy is a result of and contributor to massive wealth inequality. It directly leads to social unrest by creating large pools of unmarried males which provably correlates to violent crime; encouraging earlier acquisition of valuable females due to uneven uptake of them by high-status males (so it normalizes or incentivizes child marriages and much earlier marriages for all women); creating ripe environments for child abuse especially by co-wives who are not blood related to the children they live with; increasing the birth rate which as we all know the planet cannot sustain; and discouraging investment of funds in productive methods in favour of pursuing social status by acquiring more women.

As global wealth inequality grows I think we'll actually see more social push to normalize polygamous behaviours even in the West. Splitting a partner's time with someone else and competing with them for resources like spousal attention is a terrible deal for women and a really terrible one for kids, but women will accept it if they don't perceive better deals around, hence polyamory.
Click to expand...
That paper sucks balls. Going in the direction the paper wants to go takes us to GovernmentGetsGirlfriends. The only way to prevent single loser guys is to make women, or preferably hung qt twinks, spend time and have sex with them. Preventing polygamy does nothing. Hot girls aren't going from groupie whores for attractive millionaires to sucking a bent pickle at a house from "Hoarders" in Virginia. They shouldn't have to either. Marriage doesn't take someone off the dating, marriage, or sex market anyway. People cheat. People leave relationships. It is estimated that as many as 8% of births are examples of paternity fraud.

The downside of polygamy is seen in insular groups who can repress and expel males to reduce competition. Even then the leader sex god isn't fucking Mom Boo-boo. Those scraps to poor fucks who can't do any better.

In western societies polygamy would be most common with gay men, who are much more open to idea of open relationships and sexual freedom. Heteros aren't as cool with partner dickin' or being dicked by strangers.
 
Positron said:
Keeping more than one jealous creatures in your household unnecessarily complicate things - and God bless you when junior jealous creatures pop out.

Polygamy is only appealing if you can keep separate households and can be sure they never realize the existence of the others.
Click to expand...
You don't keep them under one roof FFS but you do let them know about each other. That way they always feel like they are in competition with the others and never quite measuring up. They're more eager to please that way.

Edit: Keeping their self-esteem low is the best way to hang on to a harem. It's not really difficult. If they had any self-respect they wouldn't be part of someone's harem anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back