Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

[TheGuntinator]

lmfao he doesn't cite @stealthytoilet as one of the stalker childs because nobody would take that shit seriously. he must realize this on some level...

The only person who takes Pat's shit seriously is ironically his toilet

Leslie is a fucking BAMF. Brave enough to take on Fatrick

Patrick is a BAMF too, Big Asshole, Mega Fat

 

[The Taco Santo!]

You could always start your own con, Patrick.

I need to brainstorm some names.

 

[DumbDude43]

You could always start your own con, Patrick.

I need to brainstorm some names.

he already has one

https://www.fatcon.org/

 

[The Taco Santo!]

Now there's a convention that'll give Pat a panel. He could tell his fellow fatties about his fat experience and generate some fat joy.

 

[Post Reply]

Patrick and Jackie are very dissatisfied with Twitter Support.

 

[Maude Snew]

Patrick announces what we all already knew. He would have turned Tuvix into next week's Wednesday night galley special if he had been captain of Voyager.
View attachment 5967270

That is a surprise. I would have expected him to fatly stand up for Neelix since that guy was dating a four year old on the show like many of his friends in the SFWA.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Patrick announces what we all already knew. He would have turned Tuvix into next week's Wednesday night galley special if he had been captain of Voyager.
View attachment 5967270

Finally pat has a based take I can agree with. Fuck that goofy ass tuvik nigga.

 

[President Tonald Drump]

The one win that Patrick has for years and that make the Pests look like a load of sex pests and Patrick doesn't even mention it. Has he somehow failed to notice that it even happened?

What win was that?

 

[DumbDude43]

The one win that Patrick has for years and that make the Pests look like a load of sex pests and Patrick doesn't even mention it. Has he somehow failed to notice that it even happened?

well he does have them all blocked
i think he doesn't see anything they say unless they tag him, so the whole "sexting leslie" side arc might have gone under his radar

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Patrick and Jackie are very dissatisfied with Twitter Support.
View attachment 5968821

Then you should have reported for those instances, not violent threats. Not hard to figure out, though shit for skin typically means shit for brains too.

 

[Procrastinhater]

If I learned anything from reading that fucked up thread with the guy sexting Leslie, its how much young John Wayne Gacy actually looks like Pat.

 

[whogoesthere]

If I learned anything from reading that fucked up thread with the guy sexting Leslie, its how much young John Wayne Gacy actually looks like Pat.

Even older pictures of Gacy kinda look like Pat, or Pats future. He has similar features, I think the eyes mostly.

 

[Uncle Buck]

Even older pictures of Gacy kinda look like Pat, or Pats future. He has similar features, I think the eyes mostly.

He's always reminded me more of John Wayne Bobbitt. But fat.

 

[Elderly Homosexual Negro]

If I learned anything from reading that fucked up thread with the guy sexting Leslie, its how much young John Wayne Gacy actually looks like Pat.

 

[Bear Powers]

Always thought there was a fairly decent similarity to Joe Don Baker. I think anyone could be forgiven for doing a double take at him in his youth, especially at a distance (see second pic). Baker is, of course, monumentally less fat than Rick though, and always has been, even in his later years.

 

[Maude Snew]

Wrong as always, stalker children. Comparing Rick to people are just your delusions again. Enjoy nature.

QED.

 

[Temperance]

Just randomly came across this in the wild. Apparently Pat name-searches himself on BlueSky (and probably all other social media platforms, tbh). And of course, he immediately tried to deny it.
https://bsky.app/profile/stealthygeek.bsky.social/post/3krw4tvmevg2z

A furry posted in a Bluesky thread six days, and he mentioned Pat but did not explicitly tag him. Funny how even Bluesky degens know about Pat.
Fast-forward to today (less than an hour ago!), and Pat showed up to correct the record!
See the time on these posts:




No, furry child. I do not name-search myself on Twitter Jr.

 

[AnOminous]

Ignoring the myriad of problems with the people who populate that organization, I'm curious if there are tax-related (or other legally obligated reasons) that they have to do shit for their 'members' to enjoy their status as a non-profit.

It's actually called inurement for a non-profit to turn a profit for its "members," is illegal, and can subject the "non-profit" to revocation of its tax-exempt status. I'm not sure how funding frivolous SLAPP suits against people for criticizing its members' books is a "public benefit," and frankly the principals should have to answer for this bullshit. It's possible this is somehow within the scope of its purpose, but it strikes me as shady to divert supposedly non-profit funds to patently frivolous losing harassment lawsuits like they did for Pat.

He's always reminded me more of John Wayne Bobbitt. But fat.

John Wayne Bobbitt had a bigger dick. And I mean at the specific time it was severed and lying in the street.

 

[Uncle Buck]

I'm not sure how funding frivolous SLAPP suits against people for criticizing its members' books is a "public benefit," and frankly the principals should have to answer for this bullshit. It's possible this is somehow within the scope of its purpose, but it strikes me as shady to divert supposedly non-profit funds to patently frivolous losing harassment lawsuits like they did for Pat.

You and I and the rest of the astute commenters here as well as on the Other Forum know it was a SLAPP, but to the people at the SFWA it was sold as an effort to combat abuse of the “Leave a Review” function of various websites by people who either hadn’t actually read the books and wanted to “defame” the author or who wanted to trash him for things unrelated to the content of his work. Because, as I’m sure he tried to argue, “if they can do it to me they’ll do it to you!”

 

[Well Intentioned]

It's actually called inurement for a non-profit to turn a profit for its "members," is illegal, and can subject the "non-profit" to revocation of its tax-exempt status. I'm not sure how funding frivolous SLAPP suits against people for criticizing its members' books is a "public benefit," and frankly the principals should have to answer for this bullshit. It's possible this is somehow within the scope of its purpose, but it strikes me as shady to divert supposedly non-profit funds to patently frivolous losing harassment lawsuits like they did for Pat.

Yeah, which is why I think Patty wasn't 100% forthcoming and just saw SFWA as a lever he could pull for legal support. They more or less disappeared as the lolsuit went on, no?