- Joined
- Jul 16, 2020
The Duke nukem one was great
"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
Actually Jews don't really believe in the eternal punishment after death like "Hell". Gehenna is the closest concept but is generally thought to not contain torture or last forever. Likewise, Hell is never explicitly mentioned in the Old Testament.
Jesus is the one to describe the lake of fire where all the unbelievers will one day be cast to be gruesomely punished for all time.
Can confirm Lift To Experience are top class.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2022
Fun fact, Thor troons out in the Edda. Dilate, pagans.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2020
Hallelujah!
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2021
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2022
When you go back to one show a week will you bring back the call in segment
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2021
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2021
>Nietzsche
Oh god, he’s a will to power faggot with mommy issues.
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2020
I kind of want to change my username to Ken Clark.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
It was a debated topic at the time of Christ; the Jews who were down with hell and resurrection and whatnot. See Luke 20:27.
Of course the Jews who were down with that mostly all became Christians heh
GungusDingaling
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2023
I’ve been trying to wrap my head around the different afterlife concepts. Michael Heiser said that there is either a Hell or the destruction of the soul, I tend to think the physical Hell is real. Beyond that, there is ALSO a Tartarus, IIRC, which is where Satan and his envoy go after the events of Revelation until he is freed again after the Melina reign? And there’s multiple heavens, and the destruction of the current heaven and earth at some point. Love this stuff, the great thing about the reality of the testament of God is that it’s a fractal in that the more you learn the more there is to learn. Literally an eternal well.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Made some videos, nothing too fancy but wanted to test out the effect of a continuous animation. This is effectively the worst case scenario.
Base:
1.9 MB
Static (single frame animation):
2.8 MB
Slow speed animation:
8.2 MB
Medium speed animation:
9.0 MB
Fast speed animation:
14.6 MB
1.9 MB
Static (single frame animation):
2.8 MB
Slow speed animation:
8.2 MB
Medium speed animation:
9.0 MB
Fast speed animation:
14.6 MB
So it seems that the simple addition of animation could quadruple the video size, where the slower it goes the lower the size.
(Note: All videos were encoded with the exact same parameters: 720p, 30fps, libx265 at 55% quality with no audio stream.)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
one nigger-tier solution (when not forcing youtube to suck dick for cock to store massive animated GIF backgrounds) is to blank over the majority of the screen with a static image when making archives for the purposes of saving space. Basically going audio only + chat when there's no video.
Slightly above nigger tier is fucking with the bitrate between segments, where you dip the bitrate when it's just the animated background, but you raise it when a video is playing or similar.
Chad tier is just sucking up the additional space, though there may be specialty codecs designed for this
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
I would like to find some way to make on-screen chat and on-screen content play nice and then get my display window to be a natural 16:9 resolution. This would reduce how much an animation bloats up the background.
The chat is always active though, how does that not bloat filesize? Is it because it's only the margin?
The chat is always active though, how does that not bloat filesize? Is it because it's only the margin?
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2023
Finished watching Tuesday’s stream and there is something I’d like to point out in regards to the clip of BMJ arguing with the nog in the Anonymous mask who said that BMJ is from Warsaw. It’s funny that Null said that BMJ isn’t Polish because I remember catching one of BMJ’s streams one time and he mentioned being of Polish descent. Yeah he’s not native Polish and most Americans have Polish ancestry (myself included) but it’s just something I wanted to point out.
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2020
He's also mentioned being mainly of Irish descent but who knows with him, he's a retarded crackhead. It's safe to assume that he's of average Amerimutt mixture.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
I'm not very knowledgeable this far into things, but here is what I've seen.
Chat does effect bitrate a good bit, that is almost all of the space taken up in the base video after all. However when a chat message moves up in the list, a good chunk of that can be saved by simply moving those blocks upwards. So new image data for a chat message is only really loaded once.
For a looping animation, libx265 does not have any optimization for "looping blocks" only moving ones. So a 3d animation could have some space to save, but it would be pretty close to directly loading in each frame of the animation over and over.
(Also, I imagine the animated emotes make up a large chunk of the space in the base video)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
Also worth noting that ABM tech is already more restricted than nukes themselves, because treaty signers didn't want to make a nuclear first strike ever an attractive option. These technologies don't develop perfectly symmetrically across the world, of course. If someone builds up their ABMs to an extent that they'll survive a second strike, it would be strategically beneficial for them to launch a counterforce first strike, withstand the crippled second strike with their ABMs, and then just finish the job. This incentivizes a first strike and breaks MAD, so ABMs are treaty limited. MIRVs do bypass even treaty illegal ABMs rather well, but we did have a stretch where defenses risked outstripping offense and counterintuitively incentivising offense throughout history already, we just mandated each other not do that. It's also just inherently easier to design offensive missiles. Cities and silos don't move, while ICBMs move at hypersonic speeds. One's just a teeny bit harder to hit than the other.
For Josh's scenario to work we'd need to have everyone at a point where everyone's defense vastly outstrips everyone's offense. I don't think this would ever happen. MIRVs already exist, and are a ridiculously high bar to answer. That sort of machine learning development will be noticed, you aren't ever just going to leapfrog that big a gap. That sort of machine learning development also will have offensive applications. That sort of machine learning development is highly unlikely to happen symmetrically, you'll have a period where someone could have an advantageous first strike and either machine learning would be treaty limited just like regular ABMs to bring MAD back or someone gets nuked. Ever since the advent of the firearm, offensive technology has pretty much always outstripped the development of their defensive counterparts. It's why higher end body armor is so regulated: If you have specialty plates, it's pretty easy to make a purpose designed round to defeat them. It's way harder to do the reverse, so we'd rather our enemies not know exactly how our high tier plates work. Plate armor couldn't stop the musket, stone walls couldn't stop the cannon, tank armor couldn't stop air power (or top attack manportables, nowadays), and I don't think that ML ABMs are going to be the exception that stops the (also most likely ML) ICBMs.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2021
The bit pointed out where God got out technicality'd is pretty funny, so I'll provide it here. Baba Metzia 59b:5
Rabbi Yehoshua stood on his feet and said: It is written: “It is not in heaven” (Deuteronomy 30:12). The Gemara asks: What is the relevance of the phrase “It is not in heaven” in this context? Rabbi Yirmeya says: Since the Torah was already given at Mount Sinai, we do not regard a Divine Voice, as You already wrote at Mount Sinai, in the Torah: “After a majority to incline” (Exodus 23:2). Since the majority of Rabbis disagreed with Rabbi Eliezer’s opinion, the halakha is not ruled in accordance with his opinion. The Gemara relates: Years after, Rabbi Natan encountered Elijah the prophet and said to him: What did the Holy One, Blessed be He, do at that time, when Rabbi Yehoshua issued his declaration? Elijah said to him: The Holy One, Blessed be He, smiled and said: My children have triumphed over Me; My children have triumphed over Me.
[After this, Rabbi Eliezer was excommunicated from the group.]
[After this, Rabbi Eliezer was excommunicated from the group.]
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2015
Irate Gamer saying "I can't sneed" in the latest MATI is one of the most surreal and hilarious things I think I've ever seen on the internet. It's like two completely different worlds colliding.