Kiwi Farms Reviews

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What are you gonna do about it?

  • Dumpster me

  • Watch me screech autisticly

  • Beg for feet pictures

  • Tell me to neck myself


Results are only viewable after voting.
Page one with a lie-
View attachment 5976154
Page 11 they admit a lack of any criminal, or real world evidence-
View attachment 5976155

Fuck these disingenuous dweebs.
Wowzers now Wikipedo, journoscum and e-celeb pseudo-intellectuals now can pretend that they have scientific proof/source and studies about the kiwifarms

You think they had a conclusion predetermined that they wanted to reach?
Yeah that KF is filled with heckin meanorino cis-hwuite-male terf chuds and should be banned by every ISPs and Null + all the users imprisoned!1!1
 
Last edited:
Page 11 they admit a lack of any criminal, or real world evidence-

You won't get on in academia unless you get down on your knees and suck the globalist cock. First named author appears to have escaped from Commie-run Vietnam. He's gonna suck that cock as deep and as hard as he possibly can -- just like his mom did when the Americans came to town.
 
A new study was published this month, on the Kiwi Farms by a British University, and they will do a live conference over it next month.
This is from further down on the co-author's bio page:
Diversity is important to me. I helped set up the department's LGBTQ+@CL network. I also made a list to highlight some academic researchers who do excellent cybercrime research but who I think are under-appreciated. This is not a list of women, it's a list that only has women and non-binary academic researchers on it. Just like some citation lists, editor lists, program committee membership lists, and conference agendas are not lists of (but only include) men.

What does this mean? Is the co-author hamfistedly making a point that men are bad? Or is this just extreme autism?
 
A new study was published this month, on the Kiwi Farms by a British University, and they will do a live conference over it next month.
Screenshot 2024-05-09 205258.png
Screenshot 2024-05-09 205056.png
Never change, Lucas.
 
Let's briefly meet the authors!

Ahn Viet Vu

1715301863464.png

"I am doing research on online crime and harm."

That moment when you try to research harm, but instead Harm researches you.

University of Cambridge Profile | Archive
CV | Attached as PDF
GitHub | Archive
LinkedIn | Attached as PDF

Alice Hutchings

1715302242162.png

"We take a data-driven approach."

University of Cambridge Profile | Archive
LinkedIn | Attached as PDF

Ross J. Anderson

1715302477509.png

"I have been literally dead for a whole month."

This guy's dead so I'm not going to bother linking anything related to him besides this article about him being dead.
 

Attachments

Isn't this the same paper that was published and we discussed a year ago?


It looks like they've made a handful of revisions.
Ah, so that explains why their profiles had already been archived a year ago.

It leaves the question: If Kiwi Farms is the den of harassment that they make it out to be, then why are individuals like this who "expose" the harassment never harassed? (This isn't a call to harass them because then you're proving them right).
 
If Kiwi Farms is the den of harassment that they make it out to be, then why are individuals like this who "expose" the harassment never harassed?

Apparently, there's no shortage of self-publishing little piggies willing to spend all day pretending that it's happening. Sometimes, they're dumb enough to perpetrate criminal harassment against themselves, file false reports on top of it, and then continually post about their hardships until someone in authority orders them to knock it off - At which point, some other hideous person on supplemental income from the state picks up the baton to claim that the other liar was "harassed off the internet" (10 times out of 10, they're still getting their social media fix on a sock account).

The charlatans who aren't totally retarded simply claim to have experienced retaliatory harassment in whichever insular, online community they're confident that anyone requesting evidence of LEA involvement to lend credence to potentially libelous, criminal allegations will be censored and banned by the "trans allies" staffing the site. The truth is one of those inconveniences they insist is Literal Genocide.
 
Last edited:
Back