You > "I want a fight and engagement because I'm bored
Me> "Try these things to generate some mald"
You > **sooks**
Me> **reignites the trashfire of the genderwars with you**
----People are coming into the thread----
You> "Wah. I don't want to talk about this"
Bitch, are you actually fucking retarded?
Do I have to handhold and talk you through every fucking thing? Christ almighty.
There is near complete consensus on tranny hatred or nigger hatred. These issues are NOT controversial on KF. "I hate niggers" - whoa slow down Billy, do you want a prize for that? What's next, you gonna post racial crime stats?
We were just in a thread with a tranny so you know this is false.
I currently have a bitter boomer skank tarding out on my profile page because I give no fucks about dunecoons. Your argument is invalid.
There is near ZERO consensus on moid/foid hatred, in fact, both are very controversial. There is no consensus on TERFs. No consensus on inceldom. No consensus on MGTOW. Also all these related issues are very controversial on KF, but not because of the reasons you might think. The controversy is purely generated from how these hot button subjects were treated by the Higher Powers.
Everything is controversial here - lmao what crack you smoking?
I fight with people every single fucking week.
This a YOU problem because you don't go outside of the Autistic Thunderdome hugboxes enough. In the past week I've seen three threads nearly pop the fuck off son.
There isn't consensus on shit here - it's a thin veneer of civility.
And why would there need to be consensus anyway?
Again, I use Animal Control as an example- I want them all to fuck off and die. You JUST got jannied for saying similar in their threads. They think they have every right to be here and we disagree with them - that's not consensus.
And your "might makes right" logic makes no fucking sense. This is literally the same strategy troons have used to push everyone else off every other platform.
If TERFs became the predominant force on this website and became the most strong and able to survive then started a campaign to bully the males off the forum - you going to leave peacefully because you got bested?
Yeah nah mate, I'd wager not.
The simple fact of talking about this results in people immediately tagging Josh and attempting to create more bans and drama.
I don't know if you've noticed but I've been fighting cunts for a month, being rude as fuck, stirring shit, and been directly antagonistic towards Null.
And yet, here I stand - a miracle of zero janitorial punishment.
It's not because whaminz because that fat fuck isn't gaming me - I just don't break the site rules.
Just politely discussing this immediately puts you on a list of bad, disruptive users that "cry about it".
Nope - I use myself as an example
No one has ever spoken to Lidl or Lurker like I have and I'm not banned.
The words I used
I simply believe that if you open up a thread where you do something very controversial like it happened here, you should NOT be protected, and your opponents should be allowed to flood it. If they can. Maybe they don't. Maybe your arguments are better and you will win.
But good arguments never required "state" protections. The authorities only have to protect retards and minorities.
Not everyone wants to fight.
We have been through this. The type of scenario you're describing is never going to exist. People don't want to spend every second justifying their position - it's exhausting.
It's not about opponents- it's about people wanting to talk about something and not wanting to talk about other random thing.
This is how every thread outside of AT works.
I already gave examples - you can't waltz into the Chris-chan thread and say "I don't think he raped his mum and you're all meanie bobeanies"
The same way I can't go up to someone in ED during the handover and dominate the conversation by talking about how much I hated a bitch at pilates in the morning.
I simply believe that if you open up a thread where you do something very controversial like it happened here, you should NOT be protected, and your opponents should be allowed to flood it. If they can. Maybe they don't. Maybe your arguments are better and you will win.
But good arguments never required "state" protections. The authorities only have to protect retards and minorities.
No.
See above.
If you want to fight, then it's MD time. That's not the purpose of threads.
And having a thread in MD doesn't mean that the people you tag have to discuss anything or talk to you.
Basically your rationale is boiling down to "If a homeless man chimps out at you, you have to engage with him otherwise you're weak"
No.
