Crime Male Inmate Charged with Raping Woman Inside California Women’s Prison, CDCR Confirms Pregnancy - Pregnancy and Rape in Women’s Prisons Shows Failure of Transgender Self-ID Laws

1715594627560.png

Natalie* had been housed with Tremaine Carroll in a prison cell in Central California Women’s Facility (CCWF) for just a few days when she says he attacked her in the shower and raped her. According to charges filed by the Madera County District Attorney’s office - which includes enhancements because Tremaine has prior sex offenses - there was at least one other victim at the prison besides Natalie.

Before California passed SB 132, “The Transgender Respect, Agency, and Dignity Act”, the law already allowed males who had surgery, and were deemed to not pose a “management and security risk”, to request housing in women’s facilities. However, the law did not allow men with penises, or those who were considered too dangerous, to be housed with women, regardless of gender identity. That all changed when California passed SB 132, which went into effect in 2021.

Tremaine Carroll: Male Inmate in Women’s Prison Charged with Rape​

After serving nearly two decades of his sentence, Tremaine began identifying as a woman and seeking transfer to a women’s facility shortly before SB 132 went into effect. The law was intended to facilitate the transfer of male inmates like Tremaine, who had penises and did not meet security standards for “gender identity” based housing in the women’s prison.

SB 132 is being challenged by four women who have already experienced harm from this policy: Janine Chandler, Krystal Gonzales, Tomiekia Johnson, and Nadia Romero, who are represented by the Women’s Liberation Front (WoLF).

"I am not a threat to them."

Tremaine is one of four intervenors in the lawsuit, represented by the ACLU of Southern California and other advocacy groups supporting the right of male prisoners to self-identify into women’s prisons. Even if they have ordinary male anatomy. Even if they are sex offenders. In a sworn declaration to the court, Tremaine stated, “I am not a threat” to the women at CCWF. Now, he is charged with forcibly raping two of them and has been moved back to the men’s facility.

The Transgender Law Center and ACLU of Southern California, representing Carroll in the case, did not immediately reply to comment.

1715594571931.png

CDCR Confirms Pregnancies After Women Housed with Male Rapists​

Tremaine is just one of the many dangerous men with whom the women in California prisons are now forced to live. One-third of the men requesting transfer into California women’s prisons are sex offenders. According to FOIA records, 50% of men in federal prison who identify as women are sex offenders. This is likely understating the problem - Tremaine himself is not considered “sex offenders” under this definition, despite his first- and second-strike offenses being for a kidnapping which included “forced oral copulation.”

"The law is being used exactly the way its author intended it to be."

Amie Ichikawa, Executive Director of Woman II Woman, revealed that there are now 16 pregnant women housed at California Institution for Women (CIW), another one of California’s women’s prisons. Some women may enter prison pregnant, but CDCR has confirmed via a new Public Records Act request that at least one woman this year has already become pregnant while incarcerated at CCWF where the male rapist was also housed.

"I wish I could say that Tremaine was abusing SB132/TRADA or that it’s being taken advantage of in some way," said Amie, "but I can’t. The law is being used exactly the way its author intended it to be: without guardrails and with complete disregard to the safety and well-being of women.”

Advocacy groups like Woman II Woman and WoLF have warned the California Department of Corrections of Rehabilitation (CDCR) for years about the risk of pregnancy and rape when women are forced to be housed with men. The state acknowledged this risk by providing condoms to the women’s facilities for the first time in 2021, immediately following the implementation of SB 132. In 2023, a Special Review by the Office of the Inspector General reiterated this concern, stating: “Because not all transferees have undergone gender-affirming surgery, the potential exists for pregnancies… in prison.”

"We all know how babies are made."

“We don’t need the state or anybody else to acknowledge the risk, because we all know how babies are made,” WoLF Executive Director Sharon Byrne told 4W.

“Housing men in women’s prisons is California’s progressive patriarchy. The state has an obligation to keep everybody safe to the best of its ability. It cannot throw incarcerated women under the bus when there are alternative ways to keep men at risk of sexual violence safe in men’s prisons, such as by getting a waiver to provide a third space.”

On the Frontlines of Fighting SB 132​

Lauren Bone, WoLF Legal Director, says that “Rape and pregnancy are the foreseeable and avoidable outcomes of laws like SB 132. But even with knowledge of actual rape and pregnancy, the state continues to house intact men at the women’s facility.”

On May 4, WoLF announced the group had erected a new billboard on California State Route 99 between Madera and Chowchilla to raise awareness of the impact of SB 132 on women in California’s custody. The sign reads, “NO MALES IN WOMEN’S JAILS!”

WoLF and Woman II Woman are hosting a press conference outside of the Madera County courthouse on May 17 — the day Tremaine Carrol will face his preliminary hearing for rape.

https://4w.pub/male-inmate-charged-...fornia-womens-prison-cdcr-confirms-pregnancy/ (Archive)
 
I doubt he actually raped them - it was consensual, and they're lying so they don't get into trouble. And now they're on the Huge Settlement Gravy Train.
The women can't #MeToo the trannies, they're a special breed of teflon tard. The state will write this off as a consent accident.

I wanna know how this nigger who has been serving two decades in prison as a man was exposed to enough of the batshit insane state of the outside world to decide that trooning out was a golden ticket.
 
Leave it to clownworld where a man couldn't get a woman thanks to feminism... gets women also thanks to feminism... right after trooning out with their junk intact and being shuffled into women jail.

The state acknowledged this risk by providing condoms to the women’s facilities for the first time in 2021
...This wouldn't be a thing if the state did the smart thing and let troons get stuck in male prison. Let Bubba and/or Bootywarrior have their booty.

Clownworld after all began when the state started enabling Tumblrites.

Housing men in women’s prisons is California’s progressive patriarchy
...But you feminists were screeching for equal rights! Technically speaking, if a woman who identifies herself as a man does crime, they should be shuffled off into male prison. But that usually doesn't happen because of what happens in women prisons. Troons knocking up bitches.

Also, way to go to nuke any sympathy you once had in this very real problem. Feminism is the reason why you have troons (who usually start out as either coom/goon addicted males or males who aren't getting any and decided to be their own woman that they couldn't get.) are being shuffled into female prisons.
 
Can we just start putting troon rapists to death instead of having this pathological empathy for the plight of mentally unstable men in drag who rape women and kids? Christ.

Yes. But as a concession to their gender identity, we should use pink ropes for the noose. That's trans inclusive.
 
Can we just start putting troon rapists to death instead of having this pathological empathy for the plight of mentally unstable men in drag who rape women and kids? Christ.
The real problem we have here is the pathological empathy. People who think this way should not be making decisions about how the rest of us live.
Failure implies this wasn't the known consequence of this policy. It's like describe a ball falling to the ground when you drop it as a failure. This is what everyone knew would happen. The people pushing for the policy either wanted it to happen or took it as an acceptable consequence.
Or they were so caught up in some other reason for doing it that they didn't think about the consequences, or they deluded themselves into thinking it somehow wouldn't happen that way. That's not any better.
Do you think they'd still campaign if they knew that it would lead to this?
Absolutely, they would.
 
Back