Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[teriyakiburns]

I mean, it's only $200. Granted, yes, it's a bit more since Null will have to pay Mr. Hardin to write up arguments that he hasn't presented before, but it is $100 cheaper than requesting a cert was.

Not even double or nothing? It's a dead cert!

Or cert is dead.

Either way, youMr Hardin should absolutely do it.

 

[Null]

Let it be known that a Soviet Jew can make copyright decisions in the face of all existing Supreme Court case law and there is no recourse to it.

If you want to just talk about people on the Internet, you are the world's nigger. You are beneath all other forms of nigger. There is no traditional avenue for seeking justice, because you are a nigger, and you do not have inherit human worth. Reputation is the most important capital in the world now, and the courts are building avenues for reputation management companies to exploit vicarious laws to protect their reputation.

Stop talking. Stop being critical. Take your shot. Stay in your lane. Never speak up. Or you'll be treated like a nigger.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Guess they're waiting for a better fact set. Or they don't understand the enormity of the conflict with previous rulings.

pay Mr. Hardin to write up arguments that he hasn't presented before,

I'm not sure what that would be. I remember some of us saying he should have pushed the circuit split harder, but it was in there. The wording of it as "well-settled law" may have de-emphasized the point, who knows.

Maybe he can argue the specific problem that it opens up new liability on contributory infringement, which warrants cert. I'd have to re-read the petition but I don't think that was fully argued on its own.

 

[Null]

Guess they're waiting for a better fact set. Or they don't understand the enormity of the conflict with previous rulings.



I'm not sure what that would be. I remember some of us saying he should have pushed the circuit split harder, but it was in there. The wording of it as "well-settled law" may have de-emphasized the point, who knows.

Maybe he can argue the specific problem of that split opening up liability on contributory infringement warrants cert. I'd have to re-read the petition but I don't think that was fully argued.

There's no point pushing a 44.2 when the last time it was granted was 30 years ago. We generally have a negative luck multiplier and we have to roll natural 20s to even be treated like human beings on a good day. The courts are going to wait for some innocent baby-faced cherub company with C-level Jews like Rumble to make the case law for them, if ever.

 

[Pedophobe]

Stop talking. Stop being critical. Take your shot. Stay in your lane. Never speak up. Or you'll be treated like a nigger.

I'll say it LOUD I'm black and I'm PROUD.

 

[Vect]

...only $200.

That made me wince.

We generally have a negative luck multiplier and we have to roll natural 20s to even be treated like human beings on a good day.

Don't plan a Waco just yet. There's still...Florida.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I'm not sure what that would be.

That the crux of the 10th Circuit's argument relied on Time Travel?

There's no point pushing a 44.2 when the last time it was granted was 30 years ago.

Oh, I didn't know that. That's an interesting tidbit. Yeah, I can see why you wouldn't want to waste the money

 

[PyrrhicRustle]

Thanks, randomtext.

 

[Telvanni]

At this point, I'm all for going Samson via malicious compliance.
Report every site violating copyright under the retarded 10th circuit fact set.
Lawyers also use Circuit rulings as citations in support of their case; suggest that they cite it until SCOTUS is forced to address

 

[WelperHelper99]

At this point, I'm all for going Samson via malicious compliance.
Report every site violating copyright under the retarded 10th circuit fact set.
Lawyers also use Circuit rulings as citations in support of their case; suggest that they cite it until SCOTUS is forced to address

Do you want Hardin to get debarred???

 

[Warm Lasagna]

At this point, I'm all for going Samson via malicious compliance.
Report every site violating copyright under the retarded 10th circuit fact set.
Lawyers also use Circuit rulings as citations in support of their case; suggest that they cite it until SCOTUS is forced to address

If anything, that would force a court to issue a new ruling saying why the 10th’s ruling is bullshit and why it shouldn’t be interpreted that way. I’m all for it.

 

[Anti Snigger]

I know it's hardly a consolation under the circumstances, but you did your best, and as a humble layman, I think that the spirit of the law is on your side.
I really admire your tenacity and calculated stubbornness, your refusal to bend the knee. What you've done here, what you continue to do, it's not insignificant, and you have my absolute respect for trying.
Never give up, make them pry the site from your cold dead hands if they want it so badly.
Internet Juche forever.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Sometimes I think I'm too cynical at the world. Then this happens.

Do you want Hardin to get debarred???

He doesn't mean that Hardin is making the reports. Other lawyers or other perfectly ordinary average concerned citizens would be. After all they would just be using the precedent set in the 10th Circuit.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Never give up

There is still Florida

 

[Anti Snigger]

There is still Florida

Backbros we're so fucking BACK

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

SCOTUS was a long shot anyway. Now all that's left is to see the lower court judges play hot potato with an obviously dogshit case.

 

[Null]

I think that the spirit of the law is on your side.

good to know

 

[Pedophobe]

At the end of the day this is the 10th circuit's problem to solve and as Florida Men we don't really need to care either way as far as our self-interest goes. Good on you Null for making a go at it but the real deal is smacking Russell and his spurious frivolous bullshit down in the district court; The USSC issue was always an abstract legal concern that someone else could deal with, if it's even necessary.

 

[Telvanni]

Do you want Hardin to get debarred???

...How?
I'm just a law abiding US citizen who is encouraging fellow law abiding US citizens to report non law abiding US citizens in the 10th Circuit for violating the Greer precedent of copyright law.

 

[WelperHelper99]

doesn't mean that Hardin is making the reports. Other lawyers or other perfectly ordinary average concerned citizens would be. After all they would just be using the precedent set in the 10th Circuit

I guess, but that's very long term. And expensive.

There is still Florida

This I have some hope on. Completely different district, court, judge, and for once it's not on Russ's home turf.