Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

I don't like or dislike Andrew Tate but does anyone think Null's "hate" of Tate feels almost performative? On a recent MATI, he leads the news segment with a boring Tate update (a few women may or may not be seeking charges against him, a few women may or may not have dropped their charges against him). As if to signal to the KiwiFarms TERF userbase "just a reminder I'm on your side and you're welcome on this website"
Null's hatred of Tate is 100% justified. I think people here just don't understand how fucking pozzed Tate truly is. The guy was raised by an absolutely deranged man who was a Fed who ran brothels and beat the shit out of his wife and would have regular Crowder tier outbursts. Tate himself grew into a fucking lunatic as well. He pretended to be a woman sexting men to start his camgirl sites. The little "Hey sexy, come watch my stream" pop up chat windows? Yeah that was Andrew Tate. The sext chats that a camgirl would give to users for "10 minute chat sessions $10"? Yeah that was Tate. He did that to help get his sites off the ground. The guy was sexting men for years. This was all before he started paying hookers, fucking JPs daughter and getting STDs, lying about how many Bugattis he had, and started his sex trafficking and Man-osphere bullshit. The guy is nothing but a psychotic liar and anyone who listens to him is retarded. Now he's talking about fucking trannies and fucking women makes you gay. What else does he personally have to admit to for you guys to realize he's a fucking faggot?
 
I just don't want him doing it to Romanian women.
Are they at risk? I never read up on the sex trafficking shit but I assumed he was importing foreign broads.
I don't have too much against Romania as a country, what really raises my eyebrow is a multimillionaire mutt looking at Evropa and deciding to settle in Romania or other places such as Bulgaria, Albania or Kosovo, where the obvious incentives for such a person are either taxes or life in an isolated countryside where it's less likely that cops'll come snooping around.
 
Are they at risk? I never read up on the sex trafficking shit but I assumed he was importing foreign broads.
I don't have too much against Romania as a country, what really raises my eyebrow is a multimillionaire mutt looking at Evropa and deciding to settle in Romania or other places such as Bulgaria, Albania or Kosovo, where the obvious incentives for such a person are either taxes or life in an isolated countryside where it's less likely that cops'll come snooping around.
Yeah, he's pretty skilled at preying upon the poor village girl (that looks good) type. These girls are also looking for a mafioso daddy to take them away from their often abusive "trad" families where dad comes drunk and beats them and the sort. In his topic there should be some of his messages leaked. He'd just go into some of these young women Instas and shower them with attention, call them to parties, all the good stuff. They can meet celebrities, Bucharest nightlife can be wild, super entertaining if you have the money and connections, which Tate does. After that honeymoon period and as they settle in his mansion, away from home, it's time to send one of his women lieutenants to tell these chicks that nothing is free, and it's time to produce, i.e. become a camwhore. Or privileges are taken away and they get kicked out of the mansions.
It's a pretty savvy method, and I have a feeling it will be incredibly hard for the local authorities to prove this was not consensual. And videochat is legal, so yeah.
 
In general, women don't argue to make a point; they argue to maneuver into a social position, or get some kind of upper hand.
This is my experience as well. It has nothing to do with what is true or not, it’s all about who has the upper hand and who does not. If she says the sky is pink and you see it’s blue, then it’s pink. If you are her boss and you say it’s yellow, she will agree with you that it’s actually yellow. Arguing with her is in her foid mind your attempt at asserting dominance over her. This is why women make for awful bosses.
 
That's the funniest part nothing he says is actually new, it's all old regurgitated PUA, old school red pill and The Rational Male blog type stuff. What's happened is that an environment has been created where someone like him can get infamy solely by not parroting the corporate line of "Man bad makes whamen sad", a majority 3rd world audience and paired with fantastic marketing by the very people who claim "YOU SHOULD NOT LISTEN TO HIM" and people like null regurgitate it as well to appeal to his base but in the process only exposed him to more people. Tate was a monster of their own creation cause what good is a "hero" with no "villain" and Tater-tot gladly played the part. It's just marketing and a lot of people bought it.
I've said it before, but I think a lot of null's blind spots are explainable by the fact that he's spent the past 7-8 years outside of the US hiding out in a country whose language he does not speak, and his socialization is almost entirely online. Honestly I think it's a reason why he's starting to morph into a weird man-hater. A lot of prominent male lolcows are degenerates that fuck up everything in their path. Dick Masterson, Rekeita, Ethan Ralph, anyone in IP2, etc. Female lolcows...eat too much and shit themselves on a livestream. Most of their destruction is focused inward, or on their families if they have them.

Young men don't get burnt out on women by clicking onto Andrew Tate one day, they get burnt out when they slowly but surely start to realize every single thing they were taught about women(specifically attracting a woman) was a big fat lie. If the system had advice for young men more substantive than "WASH YO ASS" or "Have you tried putting yourself out there bro?", figures like Andrew Tate could have never risen to power. But Andrew Tate make women mad, so Andrew Tate bad.

It's especially frustrating that in almost all other cases, null has developed a pretty decent ability to understand when someone is trying to farm rageclicks and say "this is intended to draw attention to it, I will not be feeding into the loop", but he completely loses this ability when Andrew Tate comes up. I don't have a problem hearing about him when he does something funny, but this "THEY SELECTED A TRIAL DATE FOR HIS THIRD EVIDENTIARY HEARING, BTW HERE'S AN ARGUMENT I HAD WITH SOMEONE ON TWITTER" shit every fucking week is getting real, real old.
 
I've said it before, but I think a lot of null's blind spots are explainable by the fact that he's spent the past 7-8 years outside of the US hiding out in a country whose language he does not speak, and his socialization is almost entirely online.
He's an undersocialized literal shut-in alright but that's what endears him to me, he's a purified Internet Person uncorrupted by the wickedness of the real world, a true North Sentinelese.
Young men don't get burnt out on women by clicking onto Andrew Tate one day, they get burnt out when they slowly but surely start to realize every single thing they were taught about women(specifically attracting a woman) was a big fat lie. If the system had advice for young men more substantive than "WASH YO ASS" or "Have you tried putting yourself out there bro?", figures like Andrew Tate could have never risen to power. But Andrew Tate make women mad, so Andrew Tate bad.
Tatertot is a bad man just not for the reason hole-bearers proclaim, he's a swarthy moorish motherfucker being scummy and exploitative but his yass kang slaaay act is just the marketing for his coomer business not his raison d'etere.
I think Nool is on point when he emphasises how dull the taint appreciators are for not seeing through this obvious sham, he just fixates on it a bit because of how astroturfed it gets in the media cycle and his only recently unbanned twatter smooth bwain hasn't got it's social media wrinkles back yet. Hopefully this will improve when exposed to whatever passes for civilisation across the Atlantic.
 
He's an undersocialized literal shut-in alright but that's what endears him to me, he's a purified Internet Person uncorrupted by the wickedness of the real world, a true North Sentinelese.

Tatertot is a bad man just not for the reason hole-bearers proclaim, he's a swarthy moorish motherfucker being scummy and exploitative but his yass kang slaaay act is just the marketing for his coomer business not his raison d'etere.
I think Nool is on point when he emphasises how dull the taint appreciators are for not seeing through this obvious sham, he just fixates on it a bit because of how astroturfed it gets in the media cycle and his only recently unbanned twatter smooth bwain hasn't got it's social media wrinkles back yet. Hopefully this will improve when exposed to whatever passes for civilisation across the Atlantic.
Personally, I think it's a gay sex cult masquerading as a human trafficking ring. They actually do traffick, but gay sex is the main priority.
 
Are there any studies about male and female ways of typing posts? Because my anecdotal experiences seem to suggest there are subtle but noticeable differences.

I'll be reading a post on any forum, on reddit, or on the YouTube comments section, and occasionally, I'll think to myself "he types like a woman" (because everyone on the Internet is a man) or "if this post was read out loud in real life, it would sound like a woman said it." Then I'll see their username and it's a female name, or if it's not a name, I'll dig deeper and from their history, I can glean that they are a woman.

I think the big red flag is the shaming tactics to make you feel bad for having an opinion that makes them feel personally offended, even though you were making a general observation or even though you specifically specified what you said was a generalization. Like Jesse Lee Peterson (based Black guy) says: not all, not all, not all.
There is a paper Gender, Genre, and Writing Style in Formal Written Texts, which someone took the data of and made the Gender Guesser site. I'm not sure if more stuff has been done, or if a better version of the site has been made yet, as this was back in 2006.
 
I don't like or dislike Andrew Tate but does anyone think Null's "hate" of Tate feels almost performative? On a recent MATI, he leads the news segment with a boring Tate update (a few women may or may not be seeking charges against him, a few women may or may not have dropped their charges against him). As if to signal to the KiwiFarms TERF userbase "just a reminder I'm on your side and you're welcome on this website"

Tate's shady and promiscuous past aside, Tate and Null likely share opinions on the gender roles and dynamic anyway.
A lot of the things he says on MATHI feel performative or like he's mugging to the audience.

It's a podcast, you have to pander to some degree.

I stopped watching a while ago when it became 95% Andrew Tate, Pearl Davis and Bossmanjack.

I liked the tech segments but none of those people interest me at all.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like what some of you are saying is "I wish nool would pander to me instead!!!!!"

I think this has been mentioned in this thread before but think about it with your wallets - we live in the age of the lonely independent professional woman. These lonely independent professional women have spending money they don't know what to do with. Does it make sense to alienate all the broads in this context? Ergo the monetary incentive to be extra retarded.

I know that if I have some change in my pocket I'd rather go on a night out, be it with my homies or by my lonesome, and again speaking for myself I've never superchatted nor have I bought the enhanced reaction sticker pack™ on this webzone. Conversely, I don't think either married women or single women under 35 go out (alone) expecting to spend cash and might, on the other hand, be more willing to donate by whatever means are available if they regularly get a kick out of their favorite internet gossip streamer (he even has a suffragette version of his cartoon news hamster!!! Based!!! *insert soyface here*).

Add to this also the fact that nool gets a kick from stirring shit in this thread cause he always gets a response (which might even be good for him if he gave a shit about it).

Is there a reason why in the age of birth control, condoms for both sexes and morning after pills that abortion is so prolific? Like are people really too fucking dumb to just use contraceptives? I blame blacks.
I actually don't know anyone who is having these abortions other than some blackpilling videos where some bitch says (probably getting paid to say so in the meanwhile) that she has had 300 million abortions. I am somewhat ignorant on the specific statistics but I think they are kept up mainly by minorities. Broads will still whine about abortion being a right to their undying breath literally because "but what if rape baby?" and because they think the government is a magical doohickey that by making something legal or illegal either adds or removes it from physical existence in the material realm. Same with "legalizing sex work", which basically just means your ass literally owes tax money to the government. Of course nobody in history was ever killing babies or selling ass before these things got legalized, that would be preposterous!
 
I don't want to add to the view count of this click bait article which only adds to this thot's undeserved influence..Nor do I think it deserves its own thread...

Screenshot_20240513-210244_Brave.jpg

 
Did we run out of charity causes like donating for Palestinian maimed children or saving the polar bears, or w/e
I made a charitable donation to the US government to aid the cause of maiming niggerstinian children

I've made one every year for some time in fact

I'm doing my part

Are you?
 
A lot of the things he says on MATHI feel performative or like he's mugging to the audience.

It's a podcast, you have to pander to some degree.

I stopped watching a while ago when it became 95% Andrew Tate, Pearl Davis and Bossmanjack.

I liked the tech segments but none of those people interest me at all.
I had to stop watching because of the male feminist shit. I like Null, but that's not something I tune in to the funny kiwi man podcast to hear, especially as it gets more and more prevalent.

On the subject of hating women: I really, really hate how women became the foremost 'LGBT' activists. Even the most right wing girl I know is still prone to fag hagging, and I don't know why they always fall for it.
 
On the subject of hating women: I really, really hate how women became the foremost 'LGBT' activists. Even the most right wing girl I know is still prone to fag hagging, and I don't know why they always fall for it.
One thing I noticed a while ago, especially with the increasing visibility of some feminists trying to break away from the intersectional mainstream, is that it seems that only the first wave wasn't accompanied by massive amounts of degeneracy. I could be wrong on that, but to my knowledge, they didn't have a gaggle of faggots or hippy orgies in tow.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Ser Prize
Like are people really too fucking dumb to just use contraceptives?
Yes. Genuinely yes, you could give out condoms, plan b and IUD's and they still want to get sporty with an aborty. Personally after 2, the tubes get tied. Birth control is ubiquitous yet these people are to retarded to use it.
 
Yes. Genuinely yes, you could give out condoms, plan b and IUD's and they still want to get sporty with an aborty. Personally after 2, the tubes get tied. Birth control is ubiquitous yet these people are to retarded to use it.

Niggers are too stupid to use it at all, white women are too stupid to stop using it before they turn 35.
 
Back