- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
Oh, I respectfully disagree. We got some prime (if not concentrated) whiny slobbering today:
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
This reads like a suicide letter
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Walk with me here, why would he need more time? Are there any deadlines he has missed, maybe? Actually, maybe you reckon he'll explain it in his motion?
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
Ok I get it, I'll read. Apparently... he was confused. And he's bitching about money because he wants to use their ECF system. You gotta be shitting me.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2020
This reads like a fucking Yelp review of the court. I fully expected a final sentence along the lines of "Her voice was nice though, 2 1/2 stars."
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
I mean, he did manage. Those docs were sent, and even arrived, in Florida.
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2021
Your Honor, I'm too retarded to litigate. Please just let me win.
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2019
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
So this dumb bastard's "life hung in the balance" (lmao what a dramaclown) but he couldn't be bothered to respond to anything until it was all over but the crying.
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2022
Greer really has made an excellent first impression. Too bad Josh... is the nigger,,, of the world! But we all knew SCOTUS was lofty, but was still very cool to try!
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2023
"Plaintiff's life hangs in the balance" is perfect Random.txt fodder, like most things Russ puts in his docs.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Also not an entirely wasted effort now that this case is in the 11th circuit. The Defendant has already shown a full willingness to escalate this retard case to the Supreme Court. The 10th circuit dodged the bullet. But there is no guarantee is Greer v. Moon does not appear AGAIN in a request for Writ for Certiorari, this time from a completely different Federal Circuit. Hand waving it away from the 10th is meaningless. Hand Waving it away from the 11th is precedent, because the Supreme Court would be affirming the facts of the case in two different Federal Circuits and thus establishing De Facto precedent by failure to address the issues.
Another fun reason why its a bad idea to let cases escape a circuit court once its been escalated to the appellate level.
The Supreme Court petition was not a wasted effort. The 11th Circuit must now address this issue, because the 10th circuit position is affirmed by the Supreme Court. They must affirm the 10th circuit opinion that defendants must state affirmative defenses at the 12b(6) stage, that receipt of a DMCA imparts strict liability on contributory infringement, and reposting a DMCA is not protected by the 1st amendment. or create circuit split. Or, they must get rid of the case as expeditiously as possible and in a manner that does not even hint at creating hard circuit split that will require yet another another appeal in the Case of Greer v. Moon, this time on appeal for Writ of Certiorari to the 11th Circuit of the United States.
The SCOTUS will have a very hard time ignoring that, because as stated. They would be asked to affirm by not addressing the same fact pattern again in an entirely separate federal district. Ignoring it once can be hand waved away. Ignoring it twice means Copyright trumps the 1st amendment by law.
Lets also not forget the Acerthrone case, which introduced the 10th circuit decision right out the gate in the complaint to the 4th Circuit for the Southern District of West Virginia by requiring the 4th circuit take judicial notice of the 10ths decision, that because Null reposted the DMCA he incurred strict liability and also did so outside the boundaries of constitutional speech protections.
I suppose the law clerks didn't do enough research. This is not over. The SCOTUS is going to see this case again. Either from the 11th or 4th. I suppose they can spend the next few years thinking about it, because mark my words. It's going to come back. Either in totality or as reference.
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
"It's not FAIR your Honor! Somebody finally said I wasn't completely full of crap, but he refused to give up!"
Hardin is going to have to spend half of his response straightening out the claims in this garbage document. The 10th didn't agree with Greer, they tossed 2 out of 3 claims. Utah didn't "immediately order the case transferred", there was a week in between the denial of stay and ruling on the motion to transfer (during which Greer filed nothing). The court didn't "violate long-established 10th Circuit precedent", it noted Greer's argument didn't apply to the situation.
Russ has mischaracterized every aspect of the case during his recap, to a degree I don't think I've ever seen in even his dumbest filings.
It's been exactly two months since that motion to stay was denied (March 14th). Greer should have replied to the motions by now. Even if he was retarded and confused as to where to file them, he should have a response typed up and ready to go.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
Motion for more time... how long has it been since the stay was officially denied? Almost a month now? Maybe he should have started on these replies a while ago.
Also, Russ, you see this ":" you're supposed to put the Judge's name here, or if you don't know then just leave the whole bit out.
He does realize that even if Null totally loses the case and has to sell everything we're still just going to form Cassowary Farms to continue making fun of him.
Also, Russ, you see this ":" you're supposed to put the Judge's name here, or if you don't know then just leave the whole bit out.
He does realize that even if Null totally loses the case and has to sell everything we're still just going to form Cassowary Farms to continue making fun of him.
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2016
This is the most bewildering part of this plights-ridden motion. He's not just asking for leave to respond NOW, belatedly. He wants a whole additional month!
Russ, what the fuck have you been doing since the last time you said you needed an extension because you couldn't get representation? That's rhetorical. If the court were to take a month to respond to this, Greer will ask for another extension because he evidently refuses to start working on his case until given a specific date (and even then it's a crapshoot).
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Gloves need to come off. Hardin should demand an order of the court to address the pending compliance
Greer must comply with the Motion to Join under Rule 19. He must enter Google LLC as a defendant or in the alternative explain why this is not in the interests of the case.
Greer must comply with the Motion to submit a more definitive statement, or in the alternative affirm his complaint as published.
Greer must comply with the Motion to compel scheduling conference or in the alternative withdraw his case.
The 4th one was the motion to change venue, which is what the Utah court grasped at to get rid of this mess. But the other three are still in play.
His motion to stay was DENIED.
He was ordered to COMPLY.
At this point, I suppose the next course of action would be to file under rule 41. Greer has STILL not addressed the motions he is under binding orders to comply with, and months later is asking instead for more time. No. No more time. Either file your answers to the pending motions or drop the case Greer.
Greer must comply with the Motion to Join under Rule 19. He must enter Google LLC as a defendant or in the alternative explain why this is not in the interests of the case.
Greer must comply with the Motion to submit a more definitive statement, or in the alternative affirm his complaint as published.
Greer must comply with the Motion to compel scheduling conference or in the alternative withdraw his case.
The 4th one was the motion to change venue, which is what the Utah court grasped at to get rid of this mess. But the other three are still in play.
His motion to stay was DENIED.
He was ordered to COMPLY.
At this point, I suppose the next course of action would be to file under rule 41. Greer has STILL not addressed the motions he is under binding orders to comply with, and months later is asking instead for more time. No. No more time. Either file your answers to the pending motions or drop the case Greer.
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2023
He is still complaining about Utah lmao. Also funny for him to point out that this case has been going on for three entire years. That's Null's and Hardin's Line.
I am particularly a fan of this line though. I AM FUCKING RETARDED AND MY RETARDATION CAUSED THINGS I DIDN"T LIKE. THERE IS NO JUSTICE IN THIS CRUEL WORLD.
The silver lining to this case going on so long is how much funny shit we get from Russ.
I am particularly fond of the stuff he writes that talks about how confuwuzed pouwur Ruwuseel Gweer is.
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
I vote on Emu Farms, that way Australia can't fuck with us.
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2021
Pretty bold of Russ to expose his actual grievance with the site. Does he really think winning this case means his thread gets removed? I'm guessing that was his "settlement" offer. Man's got it worse than I thought.
Edit: I just noticed that he put the return address on the mail as "south twain", the street that he insists exists in spite of his own documents (and reality) proving otherwise, and answered my own question.
Last edited: