soulgains
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2021
I was going to say something similar. All of these people will defeat him easily in a standard debate. Thinking you're the smartest in the room, in a room full of expert sophists and grifters is the most retarded approach you could possibly have. Notice how he didn't specify an actual topic, which implies itd be a free form debate. This is what the niggers hes calling out thrive on, as soon as he makes a good point, if he can even get it out in the first place, the topic will be changed. Rudyard couldnt even handle College class discourse, he cant handle internet bloodsports (whats left of it).This guy seems like a truth-above-all type autist and would likely get dominated in a debate.
How is he going to deal with Destiny just pivoting endlessly to change the topic? Whatever answers he has will eventually run out as Destiny finds the one topic that he doesn't know anything about and will claim victory.
How is he going to deal with Vaush just outright lying and dismissing any source as illegitimate? It's hard to cite the authority of a source when your opponent has a priori decided that your citations are worthless.
How is going to deal with Fuentes calling him a faggot? Its hard to win a debate when your opponent can at any time decide to revise the parameters of the debate and claim its all just a silly joke.
Also, what is he even debating about? Normally you would say "I am challenging X to a debate about Y", and not "I am challenging X, Y, and Z to a debate", especially when the X, Y, and Z in question don't seem to have a common connecting thread that you could use to infer a topic...