You cannot recreate the mindset of nearly two decades of no Star Wars, then the prequels being announced instead of sequels/Shadows of the Empire:The Film Series so it has to be better than all that, and then two fucking years of 24/7 hype, only to get....The Phantom Menace.
Its not that TPM is a bad film, its just nothing could have lived up what they hyped up, and TPM really fell short of the bar.
Anecdotes like these are why I'm happy that I was able to experience the Star Wars Saga as a complete 6-film watch through back in 2005 (finishing with ROTS in theaters), instead of having to wait 16 years between films, engendering expectations and hype.
Going in blind and watching them all together as a singular piece really relieved me of any inherent bias towards one trilogy over the other. I still like certain films more than others, but I also didn't have a decade plus hiatus coloring my perception of the films, either.
The young adult novels were pretty cool too. Better then Disney shit now. They actually made a decent obi wan Padawan origin story
The
Jedi Apprentice novels were the shit. They were so popular back in the day, in fact, that author Jude Watson would get infinitely more fan letters from adult readers than kids, and the series was extended not once, not twice, but
three times, writing the last few books on the literal eve of AOTC in 2002, and that was only because Scholastic and LFL Marketing told her to drop the Qui-Gon/Obi-Wan series to start on an Obi-Wan/Anakin series for brand synergy.
TPM definitely aged better than AotC. When every set looks like the Holodeck, it really dates it.
You may be shocked to learn that the vast majority of AOTC's sets were practical--most of them models, in fact:
That last one was literally built just to accommodate a landing shot of Padme's ship on Tatooine that's on-screen for, like, four seconds. You can even see the landing ring in the previous picture below to confirm that they're the same model.
I think the reason why people assume that AOTC was all-digital was because the film was largely shot with digital cameras, which are of a lower resolution than actual film. Moreover, the early digital cameras used on
Clones aren't the more robust digital cameras used on modern SFX-happy films like Marvel movies or whatever, so the amount of digital noise and overly-glossy look of a circa-2001 digital camera is so overbearing that it makes people think that everything filtered through those lens--even real models and sets like the ones above--were created purely through CG instead of through practical means.
It's a tremendous shame, because whenever I show people these pictures, they're legitimately shocked.
Just wait until Disney gets around to remaking the prequels. "Meesa Jar Jar Binks! Meesa's pronouns are they/them! Meesa was banned from Gungan city cuz Meesa used the bathroom that matched Meesa's true gender!"
You joke, but this has technically already played out under Disney in the novel
Solo: Last Shot, in which Han Solo attempts to be friendly to a Gungan by using words like "meesa and yousa", only for the Gungan to turn around and raceplain to Han that "not all Gungans talk like that" for an entire page.
You know that shot of the gas coming out of a vent into the conference room Kenobi and Qui-gon are in? That's the only shot in the entirety of the prequels that had no CGI.
I mean, that's not even remotely true close to being true, lol. There are hundreds of shots on practical backdrops like Tatooine and Naboo, between non-CG performers like Qui-Gon or Padme or Shmi or young Anakin, that are literally just actors against a desert or a Venetian Palace.
Fuck, even the "I hate sand" scene is completely devoid of CG, and is a Renaissance-style balcony that people can (and have) visited. Most of the Naboo sets are.
This is of course barring the possibility that George Lucas releases a Special Edition of AOTC that adds CG aquatic life or birds in the background of these shots or something...but seeing as he passed up on the opportunity to tweak AOTC to any significant degree in both 2011 and 2019 when the Blu-Ray and 4K releases came out, I'd say it's unlikely at this point.