Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) PDF
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) PDF
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) PDF
When I lived on campus, I had a really shitty experience trying to get mail and packages from the horribly run dorm mail room. So I got a PO Box and found that by using the post office's address I could get UPS and FedEx from places like Amazon. Perhaps it varies by local post office, but I never had issue with them storing my packages for a few days despite having rented the tiniest mailbox.
It’s completely at the discretion of the postmaster of the location - smaller ones won’t give a care (and as mentioned before really rural ones do it as a matter of policy) - but if it’s abused at a bigger one they start refusing.

UPS and FedEx can also throw a fit but again, smaller routes don’t care. Larger routes might push back and complain if it’s affecting their metrics.
 
Not necessarily though, a court can give the party they think is going to lose more rope to hang themselves with. Giving people extra time or a little extra leeway they shouldn't have is a common way courts do that. It helps prevent accusations of bias.
It also helps preventing an appeal on some procedural ground that results in the case having to go up to appeals court and come back, something that has already happened with this.
However, it's a bad look to not have those motions ready to go by the time the court does deny the stay. Russ really should have learned after the last time it was denied that filing a motion doesn't automatically mean anything and be working on answering those motions. The #1 rule of lolcows applies though, he hasn't learned anything, because he's too retarded.
There are some motions that toll a deadline just by being filed, but you can bet Ratface will never bother checking which are which because he's too "confused" and "afraid" despite having spent literally years engaged in recreational litigation.
 
I can believe he's confused, his suits have never gotten to this stage. It's been a long time since paralegal school, which we all assume he was just passed through to get rid of the little sex pest, and he's never really practiced his trade. He probably really has no idea what to do next. Like an animal who chases their tail and gets confused when they catch it.

But he really should have considered this before filing, and certainly before bragging about being better at law than lawyers.
 
I can believe he's confused, his suits have never gotten to this stage. It's been a long time since paralegal school, which we all assume he was just passed through to get rid of the little sex pest, and he's never really practiced his trade. He probably really has no idea what to do next. Like an animal who chases their tail and gets confused when they catch it.
I firmly believe that the college let him graduate just to get rid of him. His classmate who used to post here told us the school would warn women about him rather than hold him accountable for his bad behavior. He interned at the Utah AG's office, and had exactly one paralegal job that lasted a short time (I forget how long), and he was let go as he didn't seem to understand how to do his assigned tasks. Yeah, he's in WAY over his head, and I think he's suddenly realized that and is panicking, as he can't see a way out.
 
I firmly believe that the college let him graduate just to get rid of him. His classmate who used to post here told us the school would warn women about him rather than hold him accountable for his bad behavior. He interned at the Utah AG's office, and had exactly one paralegal job that lasted a short time (I forget how long), and he was let go as he didn't seem to understand how to do his assigned tasks. Yeah, he's in WAY over his head, and I think he's suddenly realized that and is panicking, as he can't see a way out.
If I remember correctly, wasn't he let go from his paralegal job for using the a legal portal to creep on women and the Taylor Swift lawsuit?
 
If I remember correctly, wasn't he let go from his paralegal job for using the a legal portal to creep on women and the Taylor Swift lawsuit?
In one scene of his book, he claims his bosses threatened to fire him UNLESS he denounced the Taylor Swift suit as a publicity stunt, which he refused to do

Now, he calls the Taylor Swift suit a publicity stunt, years too late to keep the job, and to the detriment of his current case
 
If I remember correctly, wasn't he let go from his paralegal job for using the a legal portal to creep on women and the Taylor Swift lawsuit?
I don't think there was ever anything definitive on that, likely because a law firm is extremely unlikely to make statements about HR decisions that get out in the public. We have to try to interpret Russ's statements in a way that fits with reality.

I can imagine everything from a (reasonable) worry that he would misuse his position to the possibility that he actually did use some kind of company subscription service to try and get information.
 
Last edited:
There's no point pushing a 44.2 when the last time it was granted was 30 years ago. We generally have a negative luck multiplier and we have to roll natural 20s to even be treated like human beings on a good day. The courts are going to wait for some innocent baby-faced cherub company with C-level Jews like Rumble to make the case law for them, if ever.

I mean, it's only $200. Granted, yes, it's a bit more since Null will have to pay Mr. Hardin to write up arguments that he hasn't presented before, but it is $100 cheaper than requesting a cert was.

I would be willing to cover the costs of filing a 44.2 motion if it's only $200 plus another couple hundred for Hardin's time. I'm aware it is an extreme long shot but after coming this far I think it's worth it to truly exhaust all options. I still can't believe they requested comment for the en banc review and then dropped it.
 
Screenshot 2024-05-15 183427.png
 

Attachments

I want to have Atty Hardins babies.

EXCERPT:
What’s more, the Plaintiff’s budget appears to have abundant funds which can be reallocated to cover postal costs. In 2018, Mr. Greer told another federal district court that he spent not less than $14,000 annually on prostitutes. Greer v. Herbert, No. 2:16-cv-01067, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78323, at *3 n.11 (D. Utah May 8, 2018). Mr. Greer also apparently carries $4,000 in cash on his person to houses of prostitution, id. at n. 12, even as he professes to this Court that he cannot pay an estimated $30 on postage for a lawsuit that he initiated. ECF No. 118 at 2. Perhaps because of Mr. Greer’s very personal ideas of what does and does not merit a slice of his ostensibly very limited budget, another U.S. District Court emphasized that it had denied Mr. Greer in forma pauperis status and the special solicitude that comes with such status
 
Some classic Russ phrase-mangling, self-pity, and making everything oddly sexual here:

1715788291865.png

How do you get off on saying I haven't participated...
Is that supposed to be "Where do you get off?", Rustlejimmies? There may be professionally rewarding moments in this case for Mr. Hardin, but I don't think he's enjoying it quite that much.
...when I clearly stated I was confused?
Actually, make that an unlovely mixture of self-pity and a grandiose sense of entitlement: Russ thinks all he has to do is state his bullshit clearly and it shall be so. Unfortunately for him, he's not capable of doing so either in writing or in speech.
I simply want to settle this, sir.
Hehehe: Hardin's got him being obsequious: we all know that if Josh had hired a female lawyer who was taking Russ to the woodshed as comprehensively as Hardin is, he'd take the first opportunity to call her a "girl".
I am not your slave and I am not Joshua Moon’s slave.
Yes you are, bitch. Now put on the gimp mask of proper federal court procedure, and drown in your own drool.
 
What’s more, the Plaintiff’s budget appears to have abundant funds which can be
reallocated to cover postal costs. In 2018, Mr. Greer told another federal district court that he
spent not less than $14,000 annually on prostitutes. Greer v. Herbert, No. 2:16-cv-01067,
2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78323, at *3 n.11 (D. Utah May 8, 2018).

this made me laugh IRL
 
"Please give me a service address so we can continue this litigation according to the ordinary rules of civil procedure."
"Uh, first tell me what you're going to send me"
How much of this blatantly malicious/retarded shit needs to happen before a motion for sanctions becomes a lock? I hope Hardin is diligently accounting for every penny he's spending on pointless postage because the drooling tard refuses to do what he is required to do.
 
View attachment 5991390
View attachment 5991391
Told you.

I wonder what prompted this sudden "compliance"
View attachment 5991402
Glad Hardin brought up that the last time Russell got an extension he missed the deadline, declared he considered two deadlines for two different thing to mean he could turn BOTH in late if you add the number of days for one deadline to the other, pinky swore he'd have it done on his new deadline he decided, and then missed that deadline and asked for another 90 days
 
Back
Top Bottom