These idiots read that ancient sandwich alignment chart meme and said yes to everything.
No definition was given so here’s mine: “A sandwich requires a flour-based around some form of protein.”
I mean there would be no reason for this argument if the plaza wasn’t so autistic about only allowing sandwich shops. I can’t see any argument for why that is such an imperative for the plaza especially since even if tacos aren’t sandwiches, I’d argue they’re at least sandwich-adjacent.
Is it Post Modern though? Seems to me that it just makes the definition simple by hacking the gordian knot of tradition. This would mean that a Hot Dog is a Sandwich too. But then I always assumed it was in the first place. Why is my Italian Roll encasing ham and cheese a "Sandwich", but when that same roll encases a whole sausage its not? The court has not fundamentally altered the definition. It has added necessary clarity.
These sort of organizations are the private enterprise version of Home Owners Associations. Them losing is always a good thing.
>opens a taco restaurant
I want to let you know that I can almost read that in uncle ruckas voice it sounds like something he would complain about but the flow isn't quite right
Thankfully what Mexico thinks has no bearing here.
I think people also have to keep in mind what something is defined as legally speaking is not necessarily what that thing is in actuality. For example tomatoes are scientifically speaking a fruit, but they are legally classified as a vegetable. When you look into food law there are a lot of weird classifications for things.
