Careercow Elon Reeve Musk - Tesla, SpaceX and Twitter owner + ex-paypal CEO. Manchild, sexual deviant, spergy autist with access to space travel

Elon vs Donald, who will be triumphant?

  • Elon Musk

    Votes: 30 2.6%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 307 26.1%
  • Us, and the friends we made along the way

    Votes: 839 71.3%

  • Total voters
    1,176
Elon is a fag because that thing he does on Xwixxer wherein he'll try to do the "least characters for the most feedback" trolling thing on the website he owns.

Commenting
!
Concerning.
Looking into this.
?
Interesting.


Is an obvious attempt to recover from the amount of boo'ing and humiliating public failures he's experienced. He clearly wants to be liked, and by garnering 6-10k likes on micro-statements is a form of wound-licking I find... incredibly fucking gay.

You know he's affirming himself in that stupid ass accent.

"Uhhh isn'T iT uhhhh... kenda coowell I can uhhhhh... say very liTTle annnd... getuuuuhhhh... such a response...?"

You own the site nigger
 
Elon is a fag because that thing he does on Xwixxer wherein he'll try to do the "least characters for the most feedback" trolling thing on the website he owns.

Commenting
!
Concerning.
Looking into this.
?
Interesting.


Is an obvious attempt to recover from the amount of boo'ing and humiliating public failures he's experienced. He clearly wants to be liked, and by garnering 6-10k likes on micro-statements is a form of wound-licking I find... incredibly fucking gay.

You know he's affirming himself in that stupid ass accent.

"Uhhh isn'T iT uhhhh... kenda coowell I can uhhhhh... say very liTTle annnd... getuuuuhhhh... such a response...?"

You own the site nigger
This is the same nigger who claimed that he knows more about manufacturing than anyone else on Earth lmfao. I hope he gets his finger chopped off by a Cybertruck.
 
I am reading this article and I have no idea what this African-American is actually doing at this point: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/06/04/elo...hip-ai-chips-reserved-for-tesla-to-x-xai.html
He's prioritising the shiny new thing with the most potential for stock price growth over the thing that's over its stock price peak.

On the subject of stock prices...

Elon Musk accused of selling $7.5 billion of Tesla stock before releasing disappointing sales data that plunged the share price to two-year low​


Elon Musk faces allegations that he illegally sold $7.5 billion worth of equity in Tesla in the fourth quarter of 2022, knowing that the business would disappoint after promising investors an “epic end of year.”

In a lawsuit filed with a Delaware court late last week, shareholder Michael Perry accused both the CEO of deliberately unloading nearly 45 million shares in advance of poor vehicle sales data to prevent an estimated 55% hit in value, and almost the entire board of collectively violating their responsibility of directors toward shareholders.

“By disposing of $7,530,113,926 worth of Tesla stock in November and December 2022 while he was in possession of adverse, material non-public information, E. Musk exploited his position at Tesla, and he breached his fiduciary duties to Tesla,” the lawsuit claims, adding other directors were both “knowing and culpable” as well.

Unlike previous stock sales by Tesla insiders, however, these were not the result of a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which removes discretion over timing from an insider and hands them to a third-party broker.

Tesla shares slumped to a two-year low on Jan. 3, 2023, following the release of the car sales data.


He is asking for Musk’s illegal gains—which the plaintiff estimates at $3 billion—to be returned to the company via disgorgement, and is seeking damages from all eight directors at the time for their “reckless disregard.”

The insider trading claims are Musk’s latest legal headache following the January ruling that voided his 2018 shareholder vote for a record compensation deal. Tesla is re-running the vote at the June 13 annual meeting.

‘Ruthless measurers’ at Tesla knew Q4 would disappoint​

Core to Perry’s argument is establishing motive through the assertions that Musk knew, first, that he still needed to liquidate stock at as high a price as possible to cover a loan for purchasing Twitter; and second, that fourth-quarter sales trended well behind his bullish October 2022 expectations (Fortune even predicted as much at the time).

Just days after boasting about “excellent demand for Q4,” he slashed prices in China—the first of many cuts yet to come.

Musk may have been aware of softening sales because of what his former powertrain head Drew Baglino described last March as a corporate culture composed of “ruthless measurers,” all harnessing up-to-the-minute data to boost sales and optimize every aspect of Tesla’s business.


“I’m not sure there’s any company on Earth that has better real-time data than Tesla,” Musk said during the Q1 investor call last year. “Our finger on the pulse is real-time and does not have latency.”

Musk went so far as to say he personally examines the results of each price change to ensure production can continuously balance demand, rising when Tesla has too many orders and falling when it has too few.

“We see what happens immediately, and adjust course. We’re thinking about it literally every day,” he continued. “Seven days a week I look at that email and so does the rest of the team.”


Using his logic, the CEO would have known that Q4 would not meet market expectations and sold his shares anyway.

Perry’s lawsuit argued that it was reasonable to infer he did so to avoid losing money, having promised nothing short of an “epic end of year” only weeks earlier.


“Musk sold this stock before the non-public information in his possession could be publicly disclosed and affect the company’s stock price,” the suit claims.
archive
 
Musk just removed the ability to see other people's liked posts on Twitter/X

Some in the comments of his announcement are saying it's because Musk himself liked a post saying "Milk Your Tiny Penis, Pervert" but idk if it's real or not
 
Elon is now being sued by his former engineers who claim they have been illegally fired: https://www.theguardian.com/science/article/2024/jun/12/elon-musk-spacex-lawsuit

Musk ordered firings after engineers raised concerns about alleged sexual harassment and discrimination, lawsuit says


SpaceX and its chief executive, Elon Musk, have been sued on Wednesday by eight engineers who say they were illegally fired for raising concerns about alleged sexual harassment and discrimination against women, their lawyers have said.

The eight engineers include four women and four men and claim that Musk, who owns the rocket-maker, electric carmaker Tesla and the social media platform X, formerly Twitter, ordered their firing in 2022.


The dismissals came, they say, after they sent around a letter calling the billionaire a “distraction and embarrassment” and urging executives to disavow sexually charged comments he had made on social media.

The lawsuit was filed in state court in Los Angeles, according to the lawyers, Anne Shaver and Laurie Burgess.

The lawsuit says Musk’s conduct fostered a “pervasively sexist culture” at SpaceX, where female engineers were routinely subjected to harassment and sexist comments and their concerns about workplace culture were ignored.

“These actions … had the foreseeable and actual result of offending, causing distress, and intruding upon plaintiffs’ wellbeing so as to disrupt their emotional tranquility in the workplace,” the plaintiffs said in the lawsuit.

SpaceX did not immediately respond to a request for comment. SpaceX has denied wrongdoing, saying the 2022 letter was disruptive and the workers were properly fired for violating company policies.

Paige Holland-Thielen, one of the plaintiffs, said in a statement provided by her lawyers that Wednesday’s lawsuit was an attempt to hold SpaceX leadership accountable and spur changes in workplace policies.

“We hope that this lawsuit encourages our colleagues to stay strong and to keep fighting for a better workplace,” she said.

The eight engineers are already the focus of a US National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) case claiming that their firings violated their rights under US labor law to advocate for better working conditions.

SpaceX filed a lawsuit claiming that the labor board’s in-house enforcement proceedings violate the US constitution. A US appeals court last month paused the NLRB case while it considers SpaceX’s bid to block it from moving forward pending the outcome of the company’s lawsuit.

Wednesday’s lawsuit accuses SpaceX and Musk of retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of California law, and further accuses the company of sexual harassment and sex discrimination.

The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified compensatory and punitive damages and an order barring SpaceX from continuing to engage in its allegedly unlawful conduct.

He also dropped the lolsuit against OpenAI after they published his emails: https://edition.cnn.com/2024/06/11/tech/elon-musk-drops-openai-lawsuit/

Lawyers for Elon Musk on Tuesday moved to dismiss the billionaire’s lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, ending a months-long legal battle between co-founders of the artificial intelligence startup.

Musk — who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 — sued the company in February, accusing the ChatGPT maker of abandoning its original, nonprofit mission by reserving some of its most advanced AI technology for private customers. The lawsuit had sought a jury trial and for the company, Altman and co-founder and president Greg Brockman to pay back any profit they received from the business.

But OpenAI quickly pushed back against Musk’s claims, calling them “incoherent” and “frivolous” and arguing in a court filing that the case should be dismissed. The company also published a blog post that included several of Musk’s emails from OpenAI’s early days. The emails appeared to show Musk acknowledging the need for the company to make large sums of money to fund the computing resources needed to power its AI ambitions, which stood in contrast to the claims in his lawsuit that OpenAI was wrongly pursuing profit.

Musk’s lawyers did not cite a reason for their request to drop the lawsuit in Tuesday’s filing. A hearing regarding OpenAI’s motion to dismiss the case had been scheduled for Wednesday.

The move to drop the lawsuit also came one day after Musk fired off a string of posts on his social media platform X criticizing OpenAI and its handling of user data, after Apple announced a partnership that integrates ChatGPT with digital personal assistant Siri for users on an opt-in basis.

“If Apple integrates OpenAI at the OS (operating system) level, then Apple devices will be banned at my companies. That is an unacceptable security violation,” Musk said in one post. (Apple said as part of its announcement that user queries sent to ChatGPT will not be stored by OpenAI.)

The Musk-OpenAI legal battle represented the diverging visions for how the ChatGPT maker — which has quickly skyrocketed in value and become the leader in the burgeoning AI space that many see as the future of technology — should be managed.

Musk accused OpenAI of racing to develop powerful “artificial general intelligence” technology to “maximize profits.” OpenAI, meanwhile, accused Musk of essentially being jealous that he was no longer involved in the startup, after he left OpenAI in 2018 following an unsuccessful bid to convince his fellow co-founders to let Tesla acquire it.

But while OpenAI called Musk’s claims “a fiction,” the billionaire is not the only person who has raised questions about OpenAI’s leadership and direction. The company last year faced a high-profile leadership crisis that led to Altman’s temporary ouster from the company, apparently over concerns by several board members about the risks of artificial intelligence. After days of uncertainty and an intervention by Microsoft, a major investor in OpenAI, Altman was restored to his position in what industry analysts said was a victory for those seeking to commercialize AI technology.

More recently, multiple high-profile OpenAI safety leaders exited the company, with several publicly claiming the company had prioritized quickly rolling out new products over safety. Weeks later, the company said it had established a new committee that would make recommendations to the company’s board about safety and security.
 
Its funny how Elon could've just used bookmarks, a feature on his own website, but he's too much of a gooner to forget about it

Musk just removed the ability to see other people's liked posts on Twitter/X

Some in the comments of his announcement are saying it's because Musk himself liked a post saying "Milk Your Tiny Penis, Pervert" but idk if it's real or not
Elon's been gooning a lot, what a coincidence this "feature" came out around the same time Elon publicly endorsed porn on twitter

1718244199924.png

1718244211595.png
 
Its funny how Elon could've just used bookmarks, a feature on his own website, but he's too much of a gooner to forget about it


Elon's been gooning a lot, what a coincidence this "feature" came out around the same time Elon publicly endorsed porn on twitter

View attachment 6082287

View attachment 6082291
Not sure i trust random screenshots that are easy to fake, though it's certainly possible
 
Well, it looks like Elon has the last laugh. He's apparently getting the 56 billion so he's basically getting a bailout for buying Twitter: https://www.reuters.com/business/au...oval-56-billion-tesla-pay-package-2024-06-13/

SAN FRANCISCO, June 13 (Reuters) - Elon Musk's army of small-investor allies took a victory lap on Thursday as the Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab CEO won a critical shareholder vote for his $56 billion pay package despite opposition from major institutions.
Mom-and-pop investors, who hold an unusually high share of the electric-vehicle maker, are typically apathetic toward voting.
But in an unusual show of support, many had been campaigning on social media for weeks for the celebrity billionaire CEO's pay to be reinstated after a Delaware judge voided it in January because she found that Musk had improperly controlled the process.

"We have the most awesome shareholder base," Musk said at the shareholder meeting after the vote was announced. "Hot damn, I love you guys," he said to a roaring and applauding crowd of investors at the Tesla factory in Austin, Texas.
Backing from retail shareholders along with support from some big institutional investors was key to turning the vote in Musk's favor, a source familiar with the preliminary tally told Reuters on Wednesday, after the CEO tipped off on social media platform X that the proposal was garnering huge support.

"Tesla's retail shareholders aren't just passively adding shares to their portfolio. They're participating in running and advancing the company," said Omar Qazi in a post on X from the handle @WholeMarsBlog. "They vote. They tell their friends. It's not just about investing. It's a movement," said Qazi who has more than 476,000 followers.
Institutional investors have been divided on the issue.
While some supported Musk's pay, others such as California Public Employees' Retirement System and proxy firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services urged shareholders to reject the pay package, calling the compensation excessive.

"When both the institutions and the proxy advisory firms are leaning in one direction, it's very rare for the vote to come out the other way," John Lawrence, a partner at law firm Baker Botts, told Reuters. "It shows in this case the company's understanding of the power of social media."

'WE HAVE YOUR BACK'​

Musk enjoys a global fan base for transforming Tesla from a startup to a behemoth and for innovation at his other companies including rocket maker SpaceX. But standing up to powerhouse investors who voted "no" on the pay package required more than just a fan base.

Social media has been abuzz for weeks with many users, such as Alexandra Merz, who posts on X as @TeslaBoomerMama, calling on people to vote. The efforts prompted some non-U.S. banks and brokerages to allow Tesla investors to vote, which was not previously the case.
"Don't mess with Tesla Retail Shareholders," Merz, who attended the meeting and received a standing ovation from investors for her endeavors, posted on X. "Your votes will help to remedy a true injustice."
Musk himself has also been actively wooing their support with regular social media posts. He had set up a separate website to educate investors on the proposals, which also included reincorporating the company in Texas, and on how to vote.
The company's board sent regular letters to shareholders highlighting Musk's importance to Tesla and alluding to the risks of losing his involvement if the pay package was rejected. Musk even offered tours of Tesla's factory to some investors who voted.
The plan worked. About 90% of the retail investors who voted were in favor, Musk said in a post on X over the weekend.
The approval is critical as Musk faces an uphill legal fight to convince the Delaware judge who said the Tesla board was "beholden" to him, while Tesla might also field fresh lawsuits over the latest vote. Still, small investors assured their continued support.
"Shareholders have spoken, again, and hopefully now our votes can officially count," X user Alicia said in a post. "@elonmusk, we've always believed in you and will continue to do so. We have your back!"
 
Minor bit of news but Tesla just lost a case against a Polish website owner: https://tvpworld.com/78195088/polish-entrepreneur-wins-court-case-against-elon-musks-tesla
A Polish entrepreneur has won a lawsuit brought against him by Elon Musk’s electric car firm Tesla.

https://tvpworld.com/74994041/twitt...mised-bonuses-violating-contracts-judge-rules
Tesla had accused Korneliusz Wieteska, owner of a website called teslashop.com, of illegally using its trademark and misleading customers.

The company further claimed that Wieteska’s teslashop.com domain closely resembles its online shop.tesla.com domain and that the Polish site should become the property of Tesla.

Teslashop.com is a forum where Tesla customers can contact each other to get cheaper parts for their vehicles.

But after taking the case to the American National Arbitration Center, judges ruled that Wieteska’s website was not trying to impersonate Tesla.

Rafał Sikora, who represented Wieteska, told Polish Radio that the court had dismissed Tesla's lawsuit.

He said: “The ruling is final. Tesla can neither appeal nor sue at this time. The court said that it did not see any signs of bad will on my client's part.

“There was no desire to exploit the name ‘Tesla’ or its popularity.

“There is no commercial gain from this site.”
 
Its funny how Elon could've just used bookmarks, a feature on his own website, but he's too much of a gooner to forget about it


Elon's been gooning a lot, what a coincidence this "feature" came out around the same time Elon publicly endorsed porn on twitter

View attachment 6082287

View attachment 6082291
What a "coincidence" indeed.

Elon’s father is a malignant narcissist and lolcow of epic proportions. He even got his own stepdaughter pregnant and is proud of it.

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, does it?
 
Back