Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 43 14.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.1%

  • Total voters
    293
One of Nick's major blunders, aside from being a homosexual adulterer alcoholic, is that, quite contrary to grifting off of this lawsuit and raising huge amounts of money (like he had hoped, and thus justifying the insane expense of Randazza), he has instead used the last year of being sued to alienate the entirety of his audience, set fire to his career, get in good with JuJu, and destroy his family. Definitely looking like it's time to settle.
 
Holy hell man. Rackets isn't spiraling, he's straight up nosediving. This is the quickest I think I've ever seen a lolcow collapse. It wasn't but about what, 1-2 years ago he was on top of the world with the Johnny Depp trial. He was making money, popular and respected in the lawtube sphere and the envy of his peers. Now he looks like a fallout ghoul, drinks like a fish and talks like a dementia patient. He's allegedly got a blizzard in his nose and a baldo on his balls. His kids are being fed cans of Chef Boyardee, which itself should be considered child abuse. He tells off colored jokes that nobody laughs at and weird observations that only further alienates him from his audience and fellow lawtubers as he continues to embarrass himself day after day. All this for the pleasure and entertainment of Daxxie Pad aka JuJu the asspegged cow.
 
His kids are being fed cans of Chef Boyardee
Nitpicking, but it was SpaghettiO's, which I'd argue is even worse.
He tells off colored jokes that nobody laughs at and weird observations that only further alienates him from his audience and fellow lawtubers as he continues to embarrass himself day after day.
Not only that, he just can't let a joke die even when it should.
 
Crypt keeper Rekieta would get his ass kicked, my money is on pre-ghoulification Rekieta
View attachment 6005084
Damn Nick used to be a chonky boy but now he's downright obese he really needs to lay off the single Dorito a day and just get all his nutrition from wholesome alcohol and drugs.
 
Locals chimes in:
Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 21-30-31 Friday Streammmmm.png


Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 21-31-12 Friday Streammmmm.png

Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 21-47-28 Friday Streammmmm.png

Screenshot 2024-05-20 at 21-48-38 Friday Streammmmm.png
 
Continued on costs: It's been posted in thread, but here's Randazza talking about Nick. 40 grand into it last June. (Assuming he equates Nick's calling Monte a pdf file to just a retard, for sake of argument to the NH Libertarians.)
This was before any court appearances (video was posted in June 2023, I believe the district court hearing was July, 2023).
Assumption is 10-20 grand per appearance and preparation, (so an additional 20-40k per appearance for Randazza and the other MN lawyer), plus probably another 20-40k for the appeal prep. I could estimate appearance costs further, but 1st class flight, top shelf stay for a few days, meals, car, etc., it adds up quick.

Randazza's estimates for costs range from 50k up to 300k if being sued.
Edit: a typo
 
Last edited:
I'm virtually certain Randazza is not dumb enough to do that without cash up front.
He's not. Nick has admitted to paying him. Randazza has admitted to being paid by him (see @Dixieland Buckaroo's post above). Rather substantially. This shouldn't even up for debate.

Nick is a great client for Randazza because he gets to try a novel argument, on the dime of a massive drunken idiot who can not bear to be wrong and would be willing to pay just about anything to avoid being determined such. It is extremely low risk for Randazza.

And without an anti-SLAPP, and under the American Rule, Nick is not seeing that money ever again.

In one very real sense, Monty has already won. I think the only way Monty could snatch defeat from the jaws of victory here is if there was a determination that Monty "sucks little boy cocks." I simply do not see that happening.
 
Last edited:
It's not that he was embarassed. It's that he was fishing for superchats and he knew what kind of audience he had and if they knew he's rich from the get go there would be less superchats. He was selling the idea that anyone could be like him (remember that he was telling people to "just create and start grinding" and was still even promising content creator how tos on locals). Think about it. Even if you were rich but your job is to grift 5 dollar chats from people who put in "this is my last $5 until my next paychack in 2 week nick! please listen-", would you go around saying you're rich?
That’s part of it. He is always attempting to hide that family wealth which is so embarrassing to him. He’s always grifting too, it can be both. The grift isn’t so interesting to me, as much as the embarrassment of what he wishes to stand for, but absolutely can’t as he has no perspective on it. He has no perspective of “a self made man,” as he isn’t one.

Yes, that being stated hurts his grift, but the fact that he scampers about with faggoty word play & behavior in order to hide this is the stand out feature imo. It’s the same thing with this Montegraph lawsuit, that ties in to his embarrassment & grift potential. He was so drunkenly utterly convinced that this case would be this big, freedom of speech thing. It was absolutely clear that what he said directly about Montegraph was defamatory. It wasn’t a “no, don’t talk about that, child,” kind of thing where someone is trying to shut you up. It was straight up defamatory lies with no leg to stand on. It was clearly never some big free speech issue. Just Nicks pleasure.

I wonder what part of his embarrassment causes him to continue on with this charade? It sure is getting expensive, or it would be for anyone without a huge amount of wealth, familial or otherwise. The part that can’t admit fault and is so afraid of exposure, grift or no, or the fact that perhaps if he was some big, free speech warrior, (rather than big time faggy hypocrite,) he’d stand for something & not be just another washed up, griftly lying streamer. He’s certainly not a non practicing trust fund brat.
 
It's not like he's fucked up a case Nick was going to win. Nick is the one insisting on all this bullshit.

And by "win" I mean he might "win" at trial but he's out so much money for so little cost to Montagraph that he's already lost no matter what happens. Just going to discovery at all is losing. Because Randazza isn't Jesus Christ Himself and can't make "sucks little boys' dicks" non-defamatory.
I’m kind of hoping for a turn around. Nick hangs up his Balldo and puts on his suit and defends himself in court not as a non practicing lawyer but now a practicing lawyer!

And then gets sentenced to death by the jury

🥃:really:
 
Back