Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 65 21.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 27.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 47 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 104 34.3%

  • Total voters
    303
out of all the fags and retards ive seen on the internet, montegraph is by far the biggest fag and retard out there. i rememeber when daddy jim tried to have a go at this guy. just treat monty like you would a brick of plutonium and you shpuld be fine.
brick of plutonium huh
someone photoship nicks face over the guy and montegraph on the plutonium.
 
"Stupid farmers, just because Nick lost the appeal doesn't mean he'll lose the lawsuit." -CGoody, probably.
That guy is the biggest mark.

"Camera angle and lighting, that's all it is. So what he drinks a lot, doesn't mean he's an alcoholic at all. 2 hours of sleep is plenty after getting drunk to safely drive kids to school. I sexted Mandy so I know it's a woman and not Asalieri."

CGoody.png
 
A good lawyer could have worked that down, I imagine. A formal apology, in public, on Twitter and in video form, plus blaming substance abuse and entering a rehab clinic (even as a PR move) could have worked down the price. I imagine most people would rather take 20k now plus the apology, than going through trial and maybe losing or even not getting the offered settlement.
Nick would not do the apology or if he did he would fuck it up after.

I caught some stream a couple of weeks ago and he spent a few minutes bashing Monty.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Justtocheck
This will twist into an excuse for the locals streams somehow

Rittenhouse era Nick, assuming the original offending stream had happened then, could have grifted this successfully. By staying the course of “I said it but it is literally comedy, my style is exaggerated, off the cuff, loud and most of all offensive” he could well have navigated audience approval and the victim role all while taking in the money. It would at least be a reasonable defense. It would fit his brand all the way back to the Maddox case to a t. So what if the defendant is an asshole, loud, offensive, fucks twins at cons or shoots pedos in the streets, this is America baby and the law doesn’t care about your feelings, prude!

The Vic case showed his aptitude for fundraising and milking the unfair suit angle. He made shitting on the opposing party, including over the top speculation of sexual deviancy, look like fighting the good fight. Or it was in many ways. Rittenhouse and Depp affirmed (pun intended) the image of the rough and rowdy non politically correct position being the right one.
He seemed anxious for getting Ronica to sue him. I too would have gladly sat through him reading a 3 page filing per 2h stream, he would ave hyped up his (lawyer’s) responses and they would have been full of little inside jokes. This could have helped him become a heroic figure, the artist suffering for his art at the hands of the unfunny and humorless, easy to further move in on that Glenn Beck etc type of media.

It must be so depressing to realize that you finally maneuvered yourself into the position you wanted so badly that you overplayed your hand to get there, only to realize forcing the issue negates all your advantages and you are finally

Felted
Have some of that prestream Jack, Nicky, every hour is prestream as long as you never go live isn’t it, checkmate farmers, cheers
 
Knowing that his appeal has fallen through, how does every single shitty insane thing that Nick has said in the interim about Monty between being sued and now (like the I think 30 minute diatribe against Monty) affect him, assuming he's just going to try to battle the lawsuit and not settle?

I'd assume Schneider being able to bring up his diatribes would just make it so much worse and therefore a lot funnier.
 
Maybe @Useful_Mistake would want it?
I have literally no control over this part of the forum. Make a new OP in the PG, and ask Null (in TtS) to replace the original OP with yours. Alternatively, and this would be faster, just ask a global mod to make some edits of the OP on your behalf.
 
That was what happened to Quasi, and it took how many years to get paid? I could only ever see doing something like that against an in-state defendant who you 100% knew was going to be collectable.
I could see it probably being negotiable to have a hybrid agreement where they get paid up front no matter what, but promise to try to collect fees back later, probably hedged a bit with some kind of "best efforts" language so the lawyer doesn't get roped into an act of futility.
 
I understand that. What I am asking is if you would want to have custody of a new OP. The litigation stuff seems to be your thing.
Sure, though, I suppose if I'm to have control over it, I might as well make have a part in making the OP myself. We could collab on it in DMs
 
it has to be ego, too, that's keeping randazza on the payroll at this point, right? he has completely shit the bed on every single task rekeita seems to have had for him, up to the point where even the thread is (somewhat, slightly, a little) shocked at how far this stupidity has managed to get. the longer he waits to get rid of the money leech, the better, in my view. nick doesn't deserve the money he has, and he pisses it away making his kids watch him kill his marriage and his own liver.
I don't really think any of this is Randazza's fault. Sometimes you get a bad case with bad facts and the only option will be to throw whatever procedural and/or novel shit you can at the walls and hope it confuses the judge or opposing counsel enough to fuck up the case. Randazza seems to have done his best under the circumstances, but honestly with a case this straightforward, there's not much he can do.
 
Back