This same guy can't read graphs properly. If we go from 5-7, we get 25% of all furries being influenced by porn.
He linked this photo too, which says that around 50% of all male furries were at least somewhat influenced by porn.
Oh yeah, I see this guy on Ruben's comments all the time. The "actual report" is biased. It only looks at "Completely" and "Not at all" in the sentence "[...] one would expect the majority of participants to indicate that furry-themed pornography plays a very strong role in drawing them to the fandom. As the figure clearly reveals, however, only a small proportion of furries, male or female, indicate that this is the case." It's saying that it doesn't hold a STRONG influence but doesn't speak about how it also somewhat has an influence. The report says that "[...] almost half of male furries say that furry pornography had little to no influence." Then what's the other half? If half of the furry community watches porn, I wouldn't be part of that community.
Also before you guys say i'm late, Ruben retweeted this today.