Plagued Ruben Sim Derangement Syndrome - Because it's definitely a good look to attack a guy who takes down pedophiles.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
From what I remember, Bluey has two types of fans: The first are weird but relatively harmless boomers, the most egregious thing I've seen them do is make Deviantart style Bluey OC's representing them and their family. The second are pretty obvious, Furries, Degenerates, Coomers, Groomers and Gooners.
Yeah i'd say that tracks. The average autists that like the show for whatever reason that make oc's, and keep to their own devices on DA. The rest being the run of the muck furfag slime as usual along with some coomers. Giving us a recipe of degenerate stew for a fandom on the interwebz.
 
This is the same website Ruben was formerly part of by the way, deliberately marketing and normalization of gender ideology to kids. The UGC update was probably one of the most tragic events of the website, up there with the filtering enabled update back in 2015 that broke most old ROBLOX games.
View attachment 6004769
Not gonna lie roblox fell off the wagon hard. Im glad i could enjoy the glory years as a kid before gender ideology, and furfags slowly seeped their way into the corporation and games entirely. I played from 2007 to 2014. 2009 was the last good year for roblox imo it was never the same past that.
 
There are only two types of protogens:
1. Under 18- Autistic & borderline retarded minors who see ‘omg robot wolf!’ and base their entire personality on the most retarded type of furfag sona
2. Over 18- pedogens on the prowl for their next victim. Autistic teens are not known for being the sharpest tools in the shed, and are therefore easy prey

All that yapping won’t change the fact that you got caught with cub porn while your dick was in your hand, furnigger.
Back in my retard days, I fell under category #1. Now, when I see a protogen, it makes my skin crawl
 
That JerseyFurry segment was brutal, like I don’t know how he will able to even recover from faking “evidence” going forward past the Ruben situation. There was more Ruben knew than he provided here since it was really the killing blow of the entire story even if you had any unreasonable doubt so far. You just know the furries will just deflect back to “BUT RUBEN SIM FANS HARASS PEOPLE!” and “NOT ALL FURRIES” line.
DER_RUBEN!.jpg
 
This furry they bring in at the end is like the most stereotypical sounding furry. He sounds just like the weird green furry who has been banned from multiple conventions and stalked Tom at that one convention. When your argument is "furries should be treated totally normally and nothing weird is going on at all," it doesn't help when you sound like a cretin and are publicly linked to pedophilic or fetishistic content.
 
There was more Ruben knew than he provided here since it was really the killing blow of the entire story even if you had any unreasonable doubt so far.
Well there is probably even more stuff we don't know. He said he is working on a video regarding this topic, so he might be keeping some material for himself, which i see as understandable in my personal opinion.
 
If furries see this clip they will freak the fuck out.:story:


So in the recent TurkeyTom video where he interviewed Ruben Sim. Ruben Sim showed a screenshot from jerseyfurry saying that the "content was removed" but if you look closely to the scroll bar you can see that he completely photoshopped it. Here's a clip.
 
Last edited:
Turkey Tom released a video with Ruben Sim about the latest RubenSimExposed drama featuring a interview with RubenSimExposed(CaptArgo).

These TT videos… if he were an honest person, he’d just tell his audience to use the Kiwi Farms’ post highlight feature to get the most pertinent of information. It’s where he gets all of his material, including comments.
 
I realize this also went unnoticed too, but Parlo did deliver on the Ruben defense video. I just really hope he releases the audio with JerseyFurry though.
View attachment 6008205

Ah yes, the classic video where the author just reads comments and opinions other people said, but in their specific annoying way instead of just linking the sources. Its like those "Ask Reddit" videos where its a shitty AI voiceover of a random thread and they make sure to not link the thread itself. Fucking faggot.
 
These TT videos… if he were an honest person, he’d just tell his audience to use the Kiwi Farms’ post highlight feature to get the most pertinent of information. It’s where he gets all of his material, including comments.
The video in question is 1) a one-on-one interview with Ruben Sim, who is telling Tom about drama he was personally involved in (including information we were previously unaware of), and 2) a direct voice-chat confrontation of CaptArgo24, the mushmouthed pedophile who runs the RubenSimExpose account. That's about as original as content can get, interviewing and interacting with the primary players of the drama the video is meant to inform the viewer about.

Tom and Ruben are also both very upfront whenever they use Kiwi Farms as a source, with Ruben even mentioning in the video that this very thread had archives of tweets that were relevant to the drama he was telling Tom about.

Why is it almost always the videos / creators that don't plagiarize from us that get accused of plagiarizing from us? You'd think with how often this supposed problem is bitched and moaned about, especially when it's directed at the commentary community, that the bitching and moaning would be correct more often. It's beginning to get unbearably annoying.
 
The video in question is 1) a one-on-one interview with Ruben Sim, who is telling Tom about drama he was personally involved in (including information we were previously unaware of), and 2) a direct voice-chat confrontation of CaptArgo24, the mushmouthed pedophile who runs the RubenSimExpose account. That's about as original as content can get, interviewing and interacting with the primary players of the drama the video is meant to inform the viewer about.

Tom and Ruben are also both very upfront whenever they use Kiwi Farms as a source, with Ruben even mentioning in the video that this very thread had archives of tweets that were relevant to the drama he was telling Tom about.

Why is it almost always the videos / creators that don't plagiarize from us that get accused of plagiarizing from us? You'd think with how often this supposed problem is bitched and moaned about, especially when it's directed at the commentary community, that the bitching and moaning would be correct more often. It's beginning to get unbearably annoying.
Talking about how TT steals le heccin thread contenterino gets those Kiwi Farms updoots and Sneeddit® Gold™.
 
If furries see this clip they will freak the fuck out.:story:
View attachment 6008090

So in the recent TurkeyTom video where he interviewed Ruben Sim. Ruben Sim showed a screenshot from jerseyfurry saying that the "content was removed" but if you look closely to the scroll bar you can see that he completely photoshopped it. Here's a clip.
View attachment 6008130
Me thinks that the more the furry fandom pushes their fuckery and look more disingenuous, the harder their fall will be in terms of internet backlash. Hopefully we can see 2004 to 2010 levels of hatred towards furries again, and that will keep internet fandoms clean from having to pander to them ever again.
 
Why is it almost always the videos / creators that don't plagiarize from us that get accused of plagiarizing from us? You'd think with how often this supposed problem is bitched and moaned about, especially when it's directed at the commentary community, that the bitching and moaning would be correct more often. It's beginning to get unbearably annoying.
To be completely fair, with retarded schizo logic from whom you are responded as an example, you could say that every e-celeb that talks about any drama steals content from Kiwifarms, since after all this is a drama site. It’s like the equivalent of Keffals saying all of his detractors gets ALL of their sources from this site, which isn’t even the case at all. Looking at this thread however reveals that this content is NOT from this site, but mostly screenshots of publicly assessable information on Twitter/X reposted here that anyone could interpret. You can easily discuss the same thing on that site, which could be where Turkey Tom also got his information since he does follow Ruben’s Twitter account. Could people not discuss drama without it being a source? What’s stopping people from actually researching what they are saying? I know when I was digging information about Letvan for any mentions of Ruben, I wasn’t even the first person to discover it but I was the first to archive it properly.
 
Last edited:
The video in question is 1) a one-on-one interview with Ruben Sim, who is telling Tom about drama he was personally involved in (including information we were previously unaware of), and 2) a direct voice-chat confrontation of CaptArgo24, the mushmouthed pedophile who runs the RubenSimExpose account. That's about as original as content can get, interviewing and interacting with the primary players of the drama the video is meant to inform the viewer about.

Tom and Ruben are also both very upfront whenever they use Kiwi Farms as a source, with Ruben even mentioning in the video that this very thread had archives of tweets that were relevant to the drama he was telling Tom about.

Why is it almost always the videos / creators that don't plagiarize from us that get accused of plagiarizing from us? You'd think with how often this supposed problem is bitched and moaned about, especially when it's directed at the commentary community, that the bitching and moaning would be correct more often. It's beginning to get unbearably annoying.
I’ll be the first to admit when I’m caught with my pants down. I didn’t watch this video, but I’ve watched enough of his content to know the formula followed and how it generally flows. Even at the expense of being humiliated, I’m glad to see he mixed it up for this video and may have brought things up that you might not be able to find here.

That being said, I’ve watched other videos where he has had guests and, in my opinion, he’s not very good at delivering outside of a very scripted and well rehearsed environment.
 
Back