Bronze Age Pervert (BAP) / Costin Vlad Alamariu & Associates / BAPists / BAPsphere / Frogtwitter / Greek Statue Twitter / "The Talmudic Network" - An "Ironic" Gay Romanian Jew Who LARPs as Bronze Age Warrior and Posts Topless Male Bodybuilders. Feuding Against Nick Fuentes Over Which One is Gayer. Defends Pederasty. Allegedly Funded by Peter Thiel & Followed by JD Vance. + His Orbiters

[AgendaPoster]

SPLC already on the Lomez train.
Jonny boy looking good here. Might not be gay. Inshaallah.

There's another Keeperman, a female named Tarah. Maybe wife.

 

[>-Ack!]

If trump loses then it will be abundantly clear that nothing short of “billions must die” actually means anything. Not mainstream conservatism, not populism, not well dressed and articulate White identity politics(Jared Taylor), only revolutionary vigor and clandestine action.

I personally think a trump loss would mean contesting the democratic arena was pointless and thus anything else was now justifiable but I have a much firmer stomach than any regular conservative.

are you seriously fedposting in a random KF thread?

 

[GreenJacket]

I wonder if these antifa journos understand the effect that doxing a Jew makes them more popular under the ZOG paradigm.

 

[Dr Sprokeberg]

Not sure if this guy is a BAP-ist or not but he seems to exist in some rather weird sphere of RW-Twitter. I get the impression a lot of people in said square aren't groypers or BAP-ists per-se, but exist in some sort of weird middle ground.







(perhaps we need a more general thread on RW Twitter, which this might be more appropriate for)

 

[Lords Greatsword]

Not sure if this guy is a BAP-ist or not but he seems to exist in some rather weird sphere of RW-Twitter. I get the impression a lot of people in said square aren't groypers or BAP-ists per-se, but exist in some sort of weird middle ground.

View attachment 5998509
View attachment 5998549
View attachment 5998560
View attachment 5998563
View attachment 5998567
View attachment 5998587
(perhaps we need a more general thread on RW Twitter, which this might be more appropriate for)

There is a very broad umbrella of accounts on Twitter that are, in some sense, Right Wing, yet the things they espouse or retweet may vary wildly from one another. Fuentes compared to BAP is one example, but there is also the difference between those trad statue profile pics and accelerationists, sometimes with "NRx" appended, who are purely reactionary in nature. There'd be a lot to try and unpack on how exactly political discourse on Twitter is divided.
It is similar to the difference between right and far-right, only multiplied further by terminally online NEETs and autists on Twitter.

 

[Rei is Shit.]

Anna Khachiyans dad was friends with BAPs dad.

 

[Ishtar]

are you seriously fedposting in a random KF thread?

For the record, I made no allusion whatsoever to violence nor did I agitate for violent action. Just in case, anyone reads this.

They really are all three things. Clueless uninspired cattle.


Yeah, they aren't exactly wrong either.

A successful movement must have the intellectuals/artists and the masses on the same side. If it doesn't it will always be in conflict with itself.

 

[Syzyg]

A successful movement must have the intellectuals/artists and the masses on the same side. If it doesn't it will always be in conflict with itself.

Eugyppius said something like this. He explained that the DR are composed of frens, writers, and readers. Frens, he says, are the ones getting angry over the writers, who he calls ecumenical. The ecumenical writers insist there is no movement and frens do.

If this is correct, the cognoscenti don't have an official movement to police anyway. If not, then they are liars and swindlers, no matter how beneficial they may happen to be.

Eugyppius also believes that the drama will make the writers more popular and is a sign of a healthy community.

So take the above with a grain of salt.

 

[magna agricola]

There was an account called "Long Knife Enjoyer" by a bookposter(Nigel Carlsbad @pompilivs, has left the internet for a while now) who hated BAP and made it as an experiment to see how easy it was to infiltrate the BAP sphere. He would post deranged stuff like this, imitating their language, and get retweeted by all the BAPists and even BAP himself. It was funny how everyone coped when Carlsbad revealed he owned the account.

 

[Freya]

There was an account called "Long Knife Enjoyer" by a bookposter(Nigel Carlsbad @pompilivs, has left the internet for a while now) who hated BAP which he made as an experiment to see how easy it was to infiltrate the BAP sphere. He would post deranged stuff like this imitating their language and get retweeted by all the BAPists and even BAP himself. It was funny how everyone coped when Carlsbad revealed he owned the account.
View attachment 6000053

SO MANY NEOLOGISMS

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

@Freya when is this getting moved out of Prospering Grounds, with all the chaos in that sector and how bored Josh is nows the time to let loose the frogs

Anna Khachiyans dad was friends with BAPs dad.

last i checked there was like 9 jews in Armenia in the 80s, what are the chances they all magically went to the US, got jobs at colleges and had kids who became famous e-celebs

 

[Freya]

@Freya when is this getting moved out of Prospering Grounds, with all the chaos in that sector and how bored Josh is nows the time to let loose the frogs

the tranny obsessed autistics here scream if a thread OP doesn't have every interaction the subject made in painstaking detail. there was so much whining in here even though I openly said the thread was WIP and I was pooling info

 

[JJLiautaud]

When is this getting moved out PG, btws?

 

[Get the rope Macaulay!]

When is this getting moved out PG, btws?

the tranny obsessed autistics here scream if a thread OP doesn't have every interaction the subject made in painstaking detail. there was so much whining in here even though she openly said the thread was WIP and she was pooling info

 

[Insuficiencia renal]

Okay, lets revive this thread. What do you people think about this? It strikes me as sketchy, even though i think he does have a point.
Certainly, the genetic decline of a population is the usual driving force behind its downfall, i can get behind that, but the way he is wording this gives credibility to the claims that are constantly made against him.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Okay, lets revive this thread. What do you people think about this? It strikes me as sketchy, even though i think he does have a point.
Certainly, the genetic decline of a population is the usual driving force behind its downfall, i can get behind that, but the way he is wording this gives credibility to the claims that are constantly made against him.
View attachment 6009466

Spoiler: Dissecting the quoted image first

>the people has no longer the same intrinsic value as it had before
Nothing has any intrinsic value. I'll be charitable and rephrase this as "by and large, the people cease having previously held desirable qualities".

>the heterogenous elements [that] prevail in [the degenerate man] give him quite a different nationality
Hard disagree. The man changes, the nationality does not. What ostensibly changes is the implication of the general/average person of that nationality as the composition of people in that nation tends towards degeneracy. But the underlying nationality itself should remain unchanged as a mere historical fact.

>[He and his civilization] will [die] on the day when the primordial race-unit is so broken up and swamped by the influx of foreign elements, that its effective qualities have no longer a sufficient freedom of action.
Sorry for the autistic detour, but I just despise this kind of writing. First (clumsily, due to imprecise and flowery language) setting up some degree of logic and argument, then suddenly opening the floodgates to bring in a whole bunch of implications and non-sequiturs.
In what way is the civilization dying? Did the author mean to convey a civilizational collapse or merely a prior less-degenerate civilization "dying" to be transformed to a more-degenerate civilization that then may keep on trudging along without a collapse?
In what way is there a supposed influx of foreign elements? Is the degeneration implied to be a foreign influence and therefore this is a "foreign element"? Or is this referring to mass or illegal immigration, as currently seen in Western welfare states? In what way does this relate to "the primordial race-unit"? Is the primordial race-unit just supposed to intermix in order to keep out "the influx of foreign elements"?
Seriously, this is some grade-A gibberish if you look at the sentence for longer than a moment.

Honestly this is dogshit, I'm not going to bother reading further, this is obviously written by someone who is very incoherent. The writer is more interested in sounding smart to people who already share a similar worldview rather than presenting logic and arguments to convince or inform others.

>"Degeneracy" refers to [specific attributes]
Not at all. Degeneracy, cf. lat. dēgenerō, refers to a state of deterioration. Meaning that degeneracy is an assessment of a thing A having deteriorated as of now compared to some prior time. The more charitable rephrasing would be not to use the word "degeneracy", but rather a qualitative assessment, like a bad culture or bad nation. Or the implication is that there used to be a nation of people who had a biological and spiritual abundance of energy, vigor, power (note, what is meant by this? power of man over nature or power of man over his fellow man or both?), and capacity for great deeds (great according to whom? collective deeds made possible by coordinated individual contributions or specific individual deeds?)

Honestly, this BAP fellow and whatever he quotes are just a lot of bullshit packed very densely, so that meaningfully dissecting and critiquing it becomes a very arduous and futile task

 

[AgendaPoster]

Okay, lets revive this thread. What do you people think about this? It strikes me as sketchy, even though i think he does have a point.
Certainly, the genetic decline of a population is the usual driving force behind its downfall, i can get behind that, but the way he is wording this gives credibility to the claims that are constantly made against him.
View attachment 6009466

TL;DR I don't want religion to put arbitrary boundaries on what I should be able to do, strength should be what is worshipped, not a random god.
Sadly this might lead to some... undesirable behaviors. Like accepting homosexuality and the sort, if the homosexual is very strong. Like let's say, Thiel, with lots of money to shower BAP in.
I partially agree with him, but there should be caveats to this that sexual degeneracy cannot be ever acceptable, regardless of religion, and heterosexuality should be dominant and exclusionary.

 

[Ishtar]

TL;DR I don't want religion to put arbitrary boundaries on what I should be able to do, strength should be what is worshipped, not a random god.
Sadly this might lead to some... undesirable behaviors. Like accepting homosexuality and the sort, if the homosexual is very strong. Like let's say, Thiel, with lots of money to shower BAP in.
I partially agree with him, but there should be caveats to this that sexual degeneracy cannot be ever acceptable, regardless of religion, and heterosexuality should be dominant and exclusionary.

In other words you want healthy religious social values without your own behavior actually being regulated. Color me surprised.

(Not)

 

[AgendaPoster]

In other words you want healthy religious social values without your own behavior actually being regulated. Color me surprised.

Not really, I want biological and scientific supremacy.

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

Not really, I want biological and scientific supremacy.

A scientific supremacy is pretty meaningless without sufficient capital to actually put innovations into practice