Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 118 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 45 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 185 8.2%
  • Billions

    Votes: 136 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 483 21.5%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,259 56.1%

  • Total voters
    2,243
So Stabby's just running around calling people pedo's now?

I wonder what his angle is? What does he expect to gain from this nonsense aside from even more people disliking him. I'd try to guess but what goes on in Stabby's brain is beyond mortal comprehension.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpiceyHuman
I wonder what his angle is? What does he expect to gain from this nonsense aside from even more people disliking him. I'd try to guess but what goes on in Stabby's brain is beyond mortal comprehension.
Good for you, peepeepoopoo.


Woah, what is this rush of power I’m feeling? It’s like I’ve transcended mere mortal bonds. Calling people names online for no reason? Is this what it feels like to be a god?

(SmugAcerthornPic.jpg)
 
Stebbins v. CmdrImperial Salt Docket 47 OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SET ASIDE ENTR OF DEFAULT
Acerthorn explains that ZellZander's claims that he never received service by email are dubious and that he knew about the case and the impending default judgment. The entire explanation spans 20 pages and goes into mind-numbing detail that is too boring and too long to summarize. It is literally 20 pages of screaming "YOU GOT MY EMAILS!"

Acerthorn makes a good point poking holes in ZellZander's claim that he fears Acerthorn will come and murder him.
trialbycombat.png
A forum post by Zellzander
I was planning that Acerthorn and I settle our differences via combat armed with Knives in the Harrison, AR court room. He'd have the advantage of knives and only needing to travel the couple of blocks so it wouldn't be too much of an inconvenience to him.

But since that is no longer on teh table, I'd share my brilliance, or lack of, when it came to that strategy. Back to fucking off I go.
ZellZander also never explained in his plea to the Court why he was afraid of being attacked by plaintiff which makes him sound insane to the Judge and anyone not already familiar with Acerthorn's disturbing murder torture fantasies.

Acerthorn includes a comment about "retarded students" he saw on Reddit for no reason.
reddit.png
Mr. Wannabe School Shooter was probably checking if his teachers were talking about him in that thread.

There are three considerations when setting aside a default judgment.
(1) “whether the plaintiff will be prejudiced”;
(2) “whether the defendant has a meritorious defense”;
(3) “whether culpable conduct of the defendant led to the default.”

ZellZander never argued any defense for his copyright infringement in his motion to set aside default judgment. I think he should lose the case and get this over with. The Court will not award anything close to $150,00 which could piss off Acerthorn even more than losing.
 

Attachments

I fully agree that Jones is hosed but I really really hope the judge awards Stabby the average worth of one of his videos to the extent of $2.50. Which is of course $2.50 more then its actual value.

I think the best part is that Stabby is fully expecting 150k to now fall into his lap. The gobbling when he doesn't get the max amount will be glorious.
 
I fully agree that Jones is hosed but I really really hope the judge awards Stabby the average worth of one of his videos to the extent of $2.50. Which is of course $2.50 more then its actual value.

I think the best part is that Stabby is fully expecting 150k to now fall into his lap. The gobbling when he doesn't get the max amount will be glorious.
Two packages of great value weiners at his local Walmart is more than what he should get for this case.
 
Acerthorn makes a good point poking holes in ZellZander's claim that he fears Acerthorn will come and murder him.
>challenge fat retard to trial by combat
>NO!!!!!!!!! I AM SCARED! HE MIGHT MURDER ME!

No hard feelings, Zander, but this is funny.
ZellZander never argued any defense for his copyright infringement in his motion to set aside default judgment.
But he did in his replies prior. That is sufficient to count when considering motion to set aside the default (though Zander should cite something to this effect). For example, see G G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Nguyen, Case no. 10-CV-05722-EJD (N.D. Cal. Jul. 18, 2011) where the court found that possibly meritorious defenses raised in a reply brief (like Zander did) transferred over to motion to set aside judgement, even if not properly raised within that motion. Of note is that this was in part due to the defendant being pro se (again, like Zander)

To this end, Zander has alleged prongs 2 and 3. As to the prong one, "To be prejudicial, the setting aside of the judgment must result in greater harm than simply delaying resolution of the case. The ordinary cost of litigating is simply not cognizable as prejudice. The standard is whether plaintiff's ability to pursue his claim will be hindered, such as by loss of evidence or increased difficulties of discovery." See: Smith v. Santa Cruz Cnty., 21-cv-00421-EJD (N.D. Cal. May. 26, 2023). I don't believe Acerthorn has asserted anything that would fulfill prong one in his favor.

"In addition, any doubt about the cause of default should be resolved in favor of the motion to set aside the default so that the case may be decided on its merits", "Where timely relief is sought from a default . . . and the movant has a meritorious defense, doubt, if any, should be resolved in favor of the motion to set aside the default so that cases may be decided on their merits," "The court's discretion is especially broad where, as here, it is entry of default that is being set aside, rather than a default judgment." Eliasieh v. Legally Mine, LLC, Case No.18-cv-03622-JSC (N.D. Cal. Jan. 15, 2019), O'Connor v. Nevada, 27 F.3d 357 (9th Cir. 1994)
 
Last edited:
Not often would I wish death upon someone but the world would be a better place if some accident befell this asshole.
In a just society, the government would earmark a lump sump payment to whoever would end Stabby's life and then be able to save the taxpayer money in the future by not having to deal with his bullshit
 
Dismissal with prejudice and recommendation of dropping Stebbins on Hiroshima
Haven't the people of Hiroshima suffered enough? First we turn them into rice crispies, then bioterrorize them with a stabhabby gaijin covered in mold and Oscar Mayer grease?

At least give them guns or katanas to defend themselves.
 
Back