Do you believe the history found in the OT is actual real history?
I'm sure some of it happened in one way or another, like most myths. The story of David in particular strikes me as mythologized history.
Christianity denies blood and soil
It doesn't. Genesis actually explicitly refers to different peoples having their own languages and lands, as ordained by God. Egypt is the land of Egyptians. Babylon is the land of the Chaldeans. Persia the land of the Persians. There is no indication that peoples don't belong to their lands and vice versa. What you're doing is taking subverted Christianity, for which there is no tradition or scriptural basis, and treating it as though that's what Christianity actually is. Which is ridiculous, because Christians throughout history practiced a blood and soil mentality. When the Greeks converted they didn't start inviting in other ethnic groups. Neither did the Romans or any of the barbarian tribes. What was the Reconquista if not one massive example of Christians practicing a blood and soil mentality? They didn't just push Islam out, they actively persecuted even the Andalusians who converted to Christianity.
But there are good argument to be made why as a Christian you need to have the Jewish people survive.
It is said that they will convert in the end times, that means God wants them to survive until the very end.
No. This is a modern, dispensationalist belief. The traditional interpretation of Revelation does not take references to Israel or Jews to mean the literal nation and ethnic group. I guess in a sense your idea of Christianity actually
is Jewish, because you're ignoring Christian tradition in favor of holding up the subversion as the real thing.
What is a Jew to someone that believes in any Pagan Gods?
There's not a real answer to this question, because there aren't any defined Pagan religions. The majority of people who call themselves Pagan are liberals who would disown any WN Pagan in an instant.
What is a Jew to a "anti-Semitic" Christian?
The descendant of a cursed lineage guilty of deicide. Martin Luther argued for the princes to shut down Jewish schools and religious institutions, in an effort to wipe out their demonic culture. I don't think that kind of anti-semitism should be put in quotation marks. It seems pretty genuine to me.
The nation of prophets according to the OT.
The nation that rejected the prophets.
A people that believe in a lot of the same things
Not even close.
But for Jesus to come back they have to survive and even thrive.
No they don't.
Because the rise of the Anti-Christ is the Jewish Mashiach and once the Jewish Mashiach has subjugate the world, Jesus floats down from the clouds and all Christians will have eternal life.
The anti-Christ is accepted by just about everyone. Jews don't have to dominate the world for that to be the case. They're just one of many peoples being deceived. And Jesus doesn't just return, he leads an army in the total destruction of his enemies. So if the anti-Christ is an ethnic Jew and the narrative is about Jews dominating the world, then that means that the Biblical narrative is explicitly stating that the mass slaughter of the Jewish people specifically is an objectively good thing. But you're choosing to dismiss that part of the book as "Jesus floats down from the clouds". But of course, the book of Revelations is not about Jews dominating the world, because it's not even really about events in our own future. John was simply writing about the time he lived in, using symbolic language and predicting a bright future for the Christian faithful.
I could go on about this topic for hours, but I'll simply say this: Literacy and the proliferation of printed texts was the worst thing that could have happened to religion. Now every layperson can read religious works for themselves, despite a great number of them clearly being written with deliberate esoteric meaning that the average person simply won't have the means to understand without thorough study.
90% of what is called Christian tradition is pagan anyway.
And?
The truth is Christianity is a veneer plastered over ancient European traditions
No, Christianity is - or rather was - the evolution of European philosophical thought. Socrates was talking about a single, loving, all-good God several hundred years before Christ was born. The person of Jesus Christ, real or imagined, embodied an ideal of selflessness and wisdom that was easy for the Greeks to adopt. From there it spread like wildfire. All of the things you listed (except the Christmas tree, which is actually rather modern) were never thought of as being Christian in origin. They were local, cultural traditions that people simply didn't stop practicing. The "Pagan" Easter and Christian Easter aren't the same holidays, by the way. The Christian celebration of Christ's resurrection just happens to fall around the same time as Spring celebrations.
And there are several explicitly Christian holidays that our ancestors practiced that you're not mentioning. Again, because your understanding of Christianity is relegated solely to the modern American kinds. Pentecost, Ash Wednesday, Palm Sunday, Good Friday; These things all used to mean a lot to European people. In some places they still do.
Maimonides one of the most important Jewish sages preached this view about Christianity
Okay. What's your point? For every Jewish thinker that thinks Christianity's a good thing there are at least a hundred others who think the opposite.
Christians and Muslims doing the dirty work for Judaism.
Sure, it's unfortunate that statues were vandalized, but the idea that it was done for some Talmudic reason is utterly retarded. Christianity predates the Talmud. Defacing the idols of opposing religions isn't a uniquely Jewish concept, by the way. The Romans took idols from the people they conquered all the time, especially those made of gold. Moreover, that statue on the left that you're using as an example isn't even an idol. It's a statue of Germanicus, who was probably hated on account of being the son of one of Rome's worst emperors.
If Christians were so invested in destroying these things, why have they preserved so many of them? A great number of them are kept in the Vatican Museum, at the heart of the most popular Christian denomination.
What did Christianity and Islam do for the Jewish people.
Diluted their genetic stock, actively persecuted them, sometimes massacred them, etc.
It kept them alive and separate as a distinct identity for 2000 years even though they didn't have a country anymore.
You act like this is some kind of amazing feat. It's not. Most peoples that existed in the ancient times still exist in some capacity, separate and distinct. Essentially what you're saying is that Christians and Muslims should've just killed them all. And it's fine if you feel that way, but you can't seriously claim that there was an active effort to keep them alive. If Christianity and Islam were both Jewish controlled, then Jews would've gone back to Israel centuries ago and had their own state again. But they weren't able to.
I find it hard to believe you're not a bad actor. No offense, but this Adam Green shit is just what Christian Identity does, but the opposite. Instead of treating Jews like just another ethnic group with its own interests, your theory elevates them to unparalleled masterminds that have controlled the western world for two thousand years. But more importantly, everything you says is so indicative of a total ignorance of European history that it's hard to believe you're not actively trying to deceive people.
To this day Jews hold a special place in Christianity, especially regarding the end times and of course in affirming the Jewish myths.
Not "To this day". It's a totally new development, almost entirely unique to American Evangelicals.
