- Joined
- Jul 16, 2023
"They've earned it." WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?
I can piece together and parse the rest, but what the FUCK is he implying? Is he being passive aggressive and sarcastic? What even is that remark?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"They've earned it." WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?
I may have to eat crow later but I do not believe this is the probable cause.Dude. He came off a "bathroom break" with white powder all over his nose going a mile a minute then crashed like a meteor a hour afterwards on a livestream. Along with admitting to using drugs in previous livestreams. Then his pastor made a report about this.
This is probable cause by the dump truck load.
I don't know, it's pretty simple. Story: YOU DID DRUGS (WITH KIDS AT HOME)
You can drink on Naltrexone, it kills the fun Factor and you just get the shitty parts of getting drunk.When I was taking it, I was explicitly told I couldn’t drink but, I wouldn’t be surprised if there are schemes for making it work
Oh no buddy...no cocaine or whiskey to help you stream? oh no that sucks....anyway you got arrested for child endangerment lol
immeasurable ego at play"They've earned it." WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?
I can piece together and parse the rest, but what the FUCK is he implying? Is he being passive aggressive and sarcastic? What even is that remark?
The only thing I can piece together is he did not learn a thing from any of this. I know that's what everyone has been saying, but his perspective has not shifted in the slightest. It's insane"They've earned it." WHAT DOES THAT EVEN MEAN?
I can piece together and parse the rest, but what the FUCK is he implying? Is he being passive aggressive and sarcastic? What even is that remark?
They had a search warrant.
Don't mistake my looking at this from a legal perspective as some kind of misplaced sympathy for Nick or Kayla. They absolutely should not have jeopardized the stability of their children's lives by being druggies. They fucked up. This is fully on them.He subjected his kids to a battering ram assault on his home instead of allowing (under protest and with lack of consent) a lawful entry.
Do you mean the people upset that Nick got arrested are the biggest drug users? Because if you think the people upset that Nick himself is on drugs are drug users, then I think we'd be hard pressed to find a shittier take.I think the most outraged people on here are probably the biggest drug users. Just like Nick.
He sounds really stressed, I think a drink to calm his nerves might help.
I get so goddamn sick of us being portrayed as the worst people on the Internet when it seems a lot of the time we are the ONLY fucking people who CARE at ALL about decency and sanity and protecting the innocent. It just makes me want to REEEEEEEE!I don't know, it's pretty simple. Story: YOU DID DRUGS (WITH KIDS AT HOME)
Also "stories" as if he were a hardened criminal. It's a single story.
"They don't know the whole story, they can't."
Can't wait for him to rebrand himself as the "Lawless Lawyer" and regale us with Family Guy cutaway vignettes of jail life.
I get so goddamn sick of us being portrayed as the worst people on the Internet when it seems a lot of the time we are the ONLY fucking people who CARE at ALL about decency and sanity and protecting the innocent. It just makes me want to REEEEEEEE!
My father is a pastor. He had to report families twice. Both times he went with another elder of the church to the parents and talk to them. Several times they took what he was saying and got better. But twice he had to go to the police.It was the Priest. Man, no wonder the cops jumped. When the Pastor decides to step foreword its real shit. That is a huge deal incidentally, for those who don't understand Christian theology. Regardless of denominations, issues that happen within the church and its parishioners are the purview of the Priest, and US law actually protects Priests as much as Lawyers. They cannot be compelled in any way to divulge information they may know that was told to them in confidence. That said, the Priest also has a duty of care to ALL his parishioners, and this includes Rekieta's kids. Which means he probably first went to Rekieta and told him to shape up. When that didn't happen, his duty shifted to the children.
It severely reduces the maximum if he can get it down by 2 and changes the category of crime, so it'll be tried and would factor into plea deals significantly if it's doable. No way of knowing what the packaging is though. Someone mentioned a vial and that would probably be at least a gram itself (can't recall if it was explicitly in the weighed portion), so it would really hinge on how the larger portion was packaged.25g is the cut off for a first degree felony, but to be fair, the baggies are really small and light. I just tried to weigh a little baggy similar to what a coke bag looks like (but it's a bit bigger cause it's for body jewelry) on my gram scale and it couldn't even register it. I genuinely don't think the combined weight of the plastic would even be 2g. I was just throwing out a number and even if it did end up weighing 2g, do you honestly think the court would reduce his sentence over .4g? I mean they could probably just assume if they scraped all the shit with residue on it, it would cover that weight. They said there was a bullet and bullets can hold at least a g, though they didn't specify what if anything was in it. I mean, I suppose he could try this argument in court but it's reeeally splitting hairs.