Cultcow Brad Watson / Richard Bradshaw Watson / Brad Watson_Miami - Jesus & Albert Einstein reincarnated, discoverer of GOD=7_4 Theory

How do you grade Brad Watson? This is an official poll that reflects the will of GOD.

  • Excellent A - Freedom from corporeal shackles and permitted audience with THE LORD.

    Votes: 167 13.5%
  • Passing B - Freedom from corporeal shackles and free attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Fair C - Freedom from corporeal shackles. Given limited, general attendance of GOD's Kingdom.

    Votes: 22 1.8%
  • Poor D - Reincarnated as Man to be given a second chance at attempting to earn GOD's graces.

    Votes: 39 3.2%
  • Fail F - Reincarnated as a non-human for 326 years, 221 days, and 14 hours.

    Votes: 76 6.2%
  • Fail F - Sentenced to eternal tortures in HELL for crimes against THE LORD GOD.

    Votes: 106 8.6%
  • Fail F - Forced to post on the kiwifarms.net for 24 years, 30 days, and 2 hours.

    Votes: 802 65.0%

  • Total voters
    1,234
Speaking of which, what was you guys' opinions on Beyond? I for one love it, and place it probably behind Wrath of Khan for favorite one out of the lot. Damn shame it didn't really do well, since it was a really good movie.
 
Now he says the 134 foot long Sistine Chapel is 74 feet long.

Maybe he meant height? No, that's 68 feet. Width? No, that's 44.

I wonder if he means another Sistine Chapel?

And he tells us not to insert 'confirmation bias' so he googles for us, and comes back with outright false information.

:story:

Speaking of which, what was you guys' opinions on Beyond? I for one love it, and place it probably behind Wrath of Khan for favorite one out of the lot. Damn shame it didn't really do well, since it was a really good movie.

It was the most Trek of the 3. It wasn't perfect, but it felt more in tune with what made the show great. A little too late in my mind, after how awful Star Trek: Into References was.
 
Now he says the 134 foot long Sistine Chapel is 74 feet long.

Maybe he meant height? No, that's 68 feet. Width? No, that's 44.

I wonder if he means another Sistine Chapel?
Possibly, but I reckon that like his understanding of the cubit, the height of a tower you can look up, and on many things involving measurements, he forgot what Jesus' adopted daddy always told him "Measure twice, cut once".

And yeah, it does suck that Beyond came after "Wrath of Lazy 2: Shinzon laughs from the grave". I think if it was the second movie, it'd probably have succeeded financially.
 
The Sistine Chapel was designed to use the same dimensions as King(4) Solomon(7)'s Temple. I got confused; I don't think there is any 7_4 designed, but I should look more closely.
 
I remember a couple years back hearing that the Sistine Chapel is something like 74 feet long. If you guys could help me track this down; it's always important to source everything.

First, I'll google: Sistine Chapel dimensions. You don't want to insert confirmation bias into your research, i.e. google: Sistine Chapel 74 feet long.

Are you a member of the Gnostic Catholic Church, Brad?
 
About Solomon's Temple, he's wrong there as well.

New Living Translation
The Temple that King Solomon built for the LORD was 90 feet long, 30 feet wide, and 45 feet high

Holman Christian Standard Bible
The temple that King Solomon built for the LORD was 90 feet long, 30 feet wide, and 45 feet high.

NET Bible
The temple King Solomon built for the LORD was 90 feet long, 30 feet wide, and 45 feet high.

GOD'S WORD® Translation
The temple that King Solomon built for the LORD was 90 feet long, 30 feet wide, and 45 feet high.


The building does not appear to have been so remarkable for its magnitude, as for the magnificence of its ornaments and the value of its materials. The porch was 120 cubits, or 210 feet high, and the rest of the building was in height but 30 cubits, or 52½ feet; so that the form of the whole house was thus:—It was situated due east and west, the holy of holies being to the westward, and the porch or entrance toward the east. The whole length, from east to west, was 70 cubits, or 122½ feet. The breadth, exclusive of the side chambers, was 20 cubits, or 35 feet; the height of the holy place and the holy of holies was 30 cubits, or 52½ feet, and the porch stood at the eastern end, like a lofty steeple, 120 cubits, or 210 feet high. In fact, as LIGHTFOOT remarks, the Temple much resembled a modern church, with this difference, that the steeple, which was placed over the porch, was situated at the east end.

http://www.sacred-texts.com/mas/gar/gar55.htm
 
Now he says the 134 foot long Sistine Chapel is 74 feet long.

Maybe he meant height? No, that's 68 feet. Width? No, that's 44.

I wonder if he means another Sistine Chapel?

And he tells us not to insert 'confirmation bias' so he googles for us, and comes back with outright false information.

:story:

Also still this fixation with foot. This theory depends to much on coincidental things like the current American cultural expression. To claim something universal based on mesurements of stuff, I would only accept countable properties or things in natural units. Everything else is just abitrary coincidences.

For example Romanesco is fractal and follows the golden ratio. That's freaking awesome and scientisticly more fascinating then anything Brad ever posted here. The golden ration is something that works completely independent of measurement units.
 
Now he says the 134 foot long Sistine Chapel is 74 feet long.

Maybe he meant height? No, that's 68 feet. Width? No, that's 44.

I wonder if he means another Sistine Chapel?

And he tells us not to insert 'confirmation bias' so he googles for us, and comes back with outright false information.

:story:

What if Brad built his own Sistine Chapel in Minecraft? Then he could smugly point at his creation and know there is a Sistine Chapel that adheres to his statements.
 
What if Brad built his own Sistine Chapel in Minecraft? Then he could smugly point at his creation and know there is a Sistine Chapel that adheres to his statements.

It'd be in line with the rest of his creations. Hollow, empty and lacking any real substance. It'd be perfect!
 
Last edited:
Also still this fixation with foot. This theory depends to much on coincidental things like the current American cultural expression. To claim something universal based on mesurements of stuff, I would only accept countable properties or things in natural units. Everything else is just abitrary coincidences.

For example Romanesco is fractal and follows the golden ratio. That's freaking awesome and scientisticly more fascinating then anything Brad ever posted here. The golden ration is something that works completely independent of measurement units.
If he could get his theories to work using Planck units, then I might be interested.
 
Or the measurement units from Battlestar Galactica. That would at least entertain me.
Planck units are also known as God's units, since there's no human-centric bullshit like alms, feet, hogsheads, and fortnights involved.
Just universal physical constants.

Edit: Didn't battlestar galactica use Old Testament measurement units, though?
 
What if Brad built his own Sistine Chapel in Minecraft? Then he could smugly point at his creation and know there is a Sistine Chapel that adheres to his statements.
I'd be quick to point out that
- something you make after you stated your hypothesis as proof of it does not count as evidence (except if your hypothesis was that something was doable)
- that it should not fit only on one side into the theory but in more than one aspect; otherwise you can simply scale everything in a way that fits your needs. And the chapel's dimensions are in the wrong ratio for that
- that it would be really nice of god to let a virtual version of something count as expression of his greatness, although I think that nothing is more witness of the human ingenuity than what we achieved partnered with computers
 
@Adamska,

"Jesus son of Joseph" - John 1:45

Joseph was a tekton (Greek): an artisan, mason, carpenter, teacher. Jesus' disciples called him "rabbi" which is Hebrew for teacher.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/06/jesus-wasnt-really-a-carpenter/

And Latin was the language of the Roman occupiers of Judea and Galilee. On the placard above the Cross, "'Jesus the Nazarean the King of the Judeans' was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin." - John 19:19-20. It's safe to assume that Y'shua bar Yosef had been taught to read and write in Hebrew & Aramaic, Greek and Latin. He was probably literate in Egyptian and other languages as well.

Y'shua was quite the intellectual. Muhammad was illiterate.
 
@Adamska,

"Jesus son of Joseph" - John 1:45

Joseph was a tekton (Greek): an artisan, mason, carpenter, teacher. Jesus' disciples called him "rabbi" which is Hebrew for teacher.
http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2010/06/jesus-wasnt-really-a-carpenter/

And Latin was the language of the Roman occupiers of Judea and Galilee. On the placard above the Cross, "'Jesus the Nazarean the King of the Judeans' was written in Hebrew, Greek, and Latin." - John 19:19-20. It's safe to assume that Y'shua bar Yosef had been taught to read and write in Hebrew & Aramaic, Greek and Latin. He was probably literate in Egyptian and other languages as well.

Y'shua was quite the intellectual. Muhammad was illiterate.
Joseph was a cuckold.
An actual, true and honest cuckold.
 
"Y'shua was quite the intellectual. Muhammad was illiterate."


Good to see he's shilling for Trump still.
It's funny since you don't need to be an intellectual to be a good speaker and preacher... hell, the Griots of West Africa were their tribe's smart people, and they had to memorize all of their rulings and stories. I think Brad might be trying to talk up Jesus just to puff his own inept keister up.
 
I'd be quick to point out that
- something you make after you stated your hypothesis as proof of it does not count as evidence (except if your hypothesis was that something was doable)
- that it should not fit only on one side into the theory but in more than one aspect; otherwise you can simply scale everything in a way that fits your needs. And the chapel's dimensions are in the wrong ratio for that
- that it would be really nice of god to let a virtual version of something count as expression of his greatness, although I think that nothing is more witness of the human ingenuity than what we achieved partnered with computers
I could very well see Brad as a Minecraft demiurge, turning his back on our world in order to create his imperfect, ethereal world where 7 (Samael) and 4 (Saklas) rule supreme.
 
Back