Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Drew Pickles 69]

Anyone else hyped to see Rekieta do a prison stream on a cellphone while he nods out on K2? I mean who wouldn't be lining up to join the balldaryan balldohood?

 

[Friend of Dorothy Parker]

I thought the same thing. It seems too serendipitous to be a coincidence that he just happened to turned left out of his driveway and was driving south down the road as they were heading to execute the search warrant.


Again, neither of the charge descriptions mention sexual or physical abuse and in fact both of the charge descriptions are identical. Not really sure what's going on.


The statute Kayla is charged under does. The charge description for both Kayla and Nick are identical and only mentions drugs

Based on the screenshot provided, they are charged under different subsection. His is allowing a child around drugs (which is neglect). Hers is allowing actual, continual physical or sexual abuse.

Neglect and abuse are different in MN*. And that's my puzzle here bc there is no charge for abuse, so her permitting it doesn't tie to anything. Maybe for purposes of these things, MN considers the b2 offense "abuse" for purposes of allowing a spouse to get an a2 charge, but that seems...like very poor drafting that could easily be made explicit. Or there is some "abuse" that is not by Nick or Kayla that Kayla knew about and let continue, though that's getting into weird territory far beyond anything seen or suggested**.

*For anyone interested, here are the intake guidelines for child protection. Child maltreatment definitions/discussion begins p. 42. Page through and you'll see descriptions of both their charges. You'll also see the distinction between neglect and abuse. Physical abuse starts p.64.

**There's been no specific info about what, specifically, prompted the pastor to report, right?

Again, from the post:

View attachment 6021273

That's not (b). They're both (a).

Her charge is under a and the penalty for it is in a2. Nick's charge and penalty are both described in b2.

 

[Bing Chilling]

Hello fellow Kiwis.

I must have missed the memo but why did we force Nick and friends to do coke again?

Your truly, Fools Idol.

For teh Lulz!!1!!!!11

 

[Black Cat Owner]

(2) A parent, legal guardian, or caretaker who knowingly permits the continuing physical or sexual abuse of a child is guilty of neglect of a child and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.

Nope. If it was (a)(1) or (c) then it'd be more aligned with the "neglect." This is specifically physical or sexual abuse that they have reason to believe was occurring and that Kayla Rekieta continually knowingly permitted.

I'm so fucking mad now.

Never ever did I think I'd be hoping for "only" physical abuse on a child

 

[Truly Rural]

Everyone jumped to cooking pan for rock, but I honestly assumed it was some shiny little tray they used to cut lines on instead of a mirror

Guess my assumptions regarding funnel?

 

[Harm]

Rate me optimistic, but I think this is a typo.

That's one massive fuckup of a typo to make. "Whoops, we accidentally listed you as charged with allowing your children to be physically/sexually abused, tee hee." It being a typo is definitely within the realm of possibility, though.

 

[Agamemnon Busmalis]

Anyone else hyped to see Rekieta do a prison stream on a cellphone while he nods out on K2? I mean who wouldn't be lining up to join the balldaryan balldohood?

A physically weak and timid lawyer with a drug and alcohol addiction does hard time in prison. Sounds a lot like OZ.

Busmalis would want nothing to do with Balldo.

 

[break these cuffs]

Based on the screenshot provided, they are charged under different subsection. His is allowing a child around drugs (which is neglect). Hers is allowing actual, continual physical or sexual abuse.

There is confusion because the statute numbers are different, but the charge descriptions are the same on their respective detention orders. Where was the fuck up? A typo on the referenced statute numbers or copy pasted the wrong description?

 

[3MMA]

ThatUmbrellaGuy and Megan Fox are complete assholes trying to blame Nick's issues on Kiwi Farms. I fucking hate these two.

How absolutely not coincidental that they both either have a thread here, or are often mentioned, similar to everyone else in the chorus of, “How dare those evil Kiwis laugh or notice something that was released online.”

 

[Fools Idol]

Got to say that I'm pretty disappointed that anyone is defending Nick. What Nick did was insane but his attitude the last year or so has been disgusting. From the Eric July shit, to Monty and the Dear John stream, Nick has been completely out of order. His friend's have been wiping his ass for him and the moment you say "no, go fuck yourself", you get treated like a Judas.

To the people running defence for Rekieta and his useless whore wife, you are the reason why Nick thinks he's infallible. Being a good friend sometimes means telling hard truths. You might think it's not your problem but if so then why are you so ready to blame people? More over, you will be judged by the character of your friends. I have to believe that anyone defending Nick or trying to pass the blame must think that it's okay to endanger your children while coked out of your mind. You must believe it's oaky to live a pig and keep guns around unsupervised kids. That's not pearl clutching, that's the truth. What you should be doing is condemning Nick and Kayla's actions and strongly urging them to seek help if not for their sake then for their kids.

They are your friends not mine, I have zero reason to clean mess up or make excuses for it. Fuck Nick, fuck his cunt wife, fuck Aaron the cuck, fuck his coke slut wife, fuck Dick and fuck anyone who even remotely thinks anything other than this.

 

[Shig O'nella]

Didn't you know that we forced Nick to become and alcoholic drug addict? Then we forced the Pastor to go to the authorities over neglect? Then we forced the Judge to sign a warrant? Then we forced the police to break down his door? Poor Nick is just under the complete control of the farms for our amusement.

After the Tranch shut down Earl had be given something to do, didn't he. Couldn't have him going stale.

 

[Brochacho]

putting myself in Nick shoes, i would have done the same, hoping my crackwhore wife and crackslut sidepiece are awake enough to flush shit down the toilet. Didn't work but that's the right move if you only care to have a lighter sentence

Exactly.... he was hoping they'd be smart enough to go the fuck up and get rid of the shit, but bitches be cray and get scatterbrained when shit starts flying. Nick needs a Latina if he plans to continue to his final arc

 

[Peaches the Wonder Cat]

Guess my assumptions regarding funnel?
View attachment 6021323

Maybe the brown substance was the batter Nick was using to make funnel cakes, and the white powder was obviously the coke he was putting on top instead of sugar.

 

[zimzam88]

How absolutely not coincidental that they both either have a thread here, or are often mentioned, similar to everyone else in the chorus of, “How dare those evil Kiwis laugh or notice something that was released online.”

While simultaneously making large sums of money doing the exact same thing to other people like in the Rittenhouse and Depp trials. They're just retarded.

 

[Sharpeteer]

How absolutely not coincidental that they both either have a thread here, or are often mentioned, similar to everyone else in the chorus of, “How dare those evil Kiwis laugh or notice something that was released online.”

Kurt was 100% right in everything he said about Megan.

That's unfortunately the only thing he was right about. I really wanted to like him for pushing back on Nick's idiocy a week ago or so.

 

[goh]

Rate me optimistic, but I think this is a typo. If you look on the charging document for Kayla, it's the exact same description for the charge against Nick.

I think it's a typo or legalese for advanced neglect. Still, I would like to make one point:
The fact that I can't say, "Rekieta 100% did not physically nor sexually abuse his children," is itself a condemnation.
I cannot comfortably say Nick did not abuse his children. He's alluded to beating them unprompted, made multiple jokes about child molestation, and verbally attacked his children on-stream. Nick muddied the water so much that I can't rule out anything.

 

[polar bear]

Phew, it's a good thing I said that the speculation was that he's cooking crack. I remain technically correct.

Be careful out there, it's serious business here, no room for gossip, only STRAIGHT FACTS.

There is a firing squad waiting outside my door and the guys said that if I will ever start typing any funny bullshit speculations about illegal ivory trade charges again, they wi

 

[Butwhythough2]

His locals is on to us. We planted the coke and forced him at gunpoint to snort it.

 

[Lancelot]

So fuck off and go somewhere else if you hate it here so much you goddamn idiot.

Cry about it some more ? Maybe you’ll get a life beyond seething about e celebs and then whining when you get dunked on

 

[Drew Pickles 69]

Guess my assumptions regarding funnel?
View attachment 6021323

"Unknown Brown Substance"
Uh oh poopoo