Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[AnOminous]

There are plenty of post modern thinkers these days who believe everyone has their truth, that you can't deny someone's lived experience, yadda yadda.

I utterly reject that and all but reach for a gun when I hear the phrase "lived experience." Your "lived experience" means shit to me. Put some actual facts on the table, bitch.

Drug addicts get what they deserve.

I partly disagree, not in regard to the Rekieta scum, but in general. Some drug addicts get way worse than they deserve. That said, they get what they had coming. They get the natural consequences of what they do. I think deserves got nothing to do with it.

We did it guys! KF is the MLK Jr Blvd. of the Internet!

Well we kind of are, although I'd prefer Malcolm X Boulevard.

 

[mindlessobserver]

https://metokur.myshopify.com/collections/non-practicing-merchandise

View attachment 6021709View attachment 6021710

I know its a joke to put D.A.R.E on the merch, but holy fuck if Rekieta is not a better public service announcement for avoiding drugs then the billions of dollars the feds blew on that program.

 

[trash cat]

The cops show up. Nick asks to see a warrant (totally fair!). Cops show him the warrant. Nick, like the impetuous MAN BABY WILL ALL KNOW HIM TO BE throws the warrant on the ground because he probably realized it's valid, and he's been checkmated.

Then the cops demand the door code. Nick says no, and tells them they're gonna have to do a dynamic entry.

I wrote this yesterday so I'm just going to repost it because I think the points are still valid ...

---
My reading of the probable cause affidavit suggests the following possibility... That Nick didn't see the warrant until after they busted down the door.

Main point: The cops asked Nick for the door code when they pulled him over at the traffic stop, but before he got a copy of the warrant.

1. Cops arrive at house.
2. Rekieta gets pulled over nearby.
3. Cops ask minor to let them in. She refuses.
4. Cops ask Rekieta at the traffic stop for door code. He refuses.
5. Cops bust down the house door.
6. Cops drive traffic stop Rekieta to the house and show him the warrant.
7. Rekieta throws the warrant on the ground.

That is the story that I think is told by the probable cause affidavit and common sense.

---
I don't think that we know for a fact whether or not Nick refused the door code before or after seeing the search warrant.

The affidavit is not clear on this point.

My read (and I think common sense suggests) that Nick only saw the search warrant after they drove him back to the house from the traffic stop.

The cop that pulled him over might not have had a copy of the warrant. It might have been at the house.

Also that explains why Nick would throw the warrant on the ground after seeing it for the first time, at his house, with the door busted in.

It also explains the refusal of the door code. (He hadn't yet seen the warrant when refusing to give the code at the traffic stop)

There is an alternative story, which is that Nick refused to give the code after seeing a copy of the warrant at the traffic stop. Then when he gets back to the house, he is given another second copy of the warrant, and throws that copy on the ground.

Which makes more sense?

 

[Butt_Pouncer]

I can only assume that every lawtuber defending nick get up to the same extreme acts of hedonism off camera

Even the Gunt never had this level of guntguarding or Noseguarding for that matter

 

[AnOminous]

Many people forget that understanding, forgiveness and charity is the basis of Christianity.

Forgiveness comes after repentance, and frankly, I have nothing to forgive Nick for because he's never done anything to me personally. Forgiveness is for the people he harmed, and for his creator.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

There are plenty of post modern thinkers these days who believe everyone has their truth, that you can't deny someone's lived experience, yadda yadda. Aaron has been using that type of language in his streams. He says he's been going to therapy and it's something I actually believe because he's been spouting that garbage.

I highly recommend "The poison of subjectivism" by C.S. Lewis if you want to see this thinking torn apart limb from limb. Can't find a good pdf link right now and the audio of Jauffre from oblivion reading it doesn't seem to be on YouTube anymore.

 

[Mouse Cop]

May have been asked already in the hurricane of posts, but I'm curious : Would the sexual part of that charge explicitly imply molestation or could it be something like Nick drunk off his ass walking around naked with the kids present or leaving porn out where they could get to it? Is there any way for that specific charge to not imply something horrible beyond what we're already aware of?

It's not even confirmed to be sexual. The documents states that there was either physical OR sexual abuse, and that Kayla allowed this to happen without intervening. What's mysterious is that nobody (that we know of) has been charged with actually committing said abuse. So the question is, who was Kayla allowing to abuse her children?

 

[norbo]

Total dindu logic. This schizocow has her own thread btw.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/dr-karlyn-borysenko.125037/page-28#post-14875362

Open Relationship lmao. Boys we have another wife! I'll have to start following this retard.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

For some inexplicable reason Sean says "good" as to the last part.

It was a technicality to avoid an argument later that he consented to their search. If there's a problem with the warrant to search the home, then his willful opening of the door could be argued to represent consent to their search, which would vitiate Rekieta's claim that the warrant was defective and thus the search should be suppressed.

Of course, this has to be weighed against the trauma to his kids inside and his knowledge that the jig is up. From that standpoint, what he did was wrong. But from a purely legal standpoint, it was probably appropriate. Sean isn't wrong, legally.

That charge makes my stomach churn. And makes all the child molestation jokes make sense. Nick was raping his own kids, wasn't he, in that filthy crack den?

I think it's more likely it relates to that comment Nick made about him having to spend a night watching over one of his kids. If one of his younger kids ate a weed gummy unknowingly—and it seems Kayla had such gummies in her prescription pill bottle when she was arrested—then that might constitute physical abuse. And remember Aaron blowing up in that clip about not having drugs around children? The context was them watching a news report about a teacher bringing weed gummies to an elementary school. Makes you wonder...

If he had been molesting his own kids and the police knew, the charges would reflect that severity. I think it's more likely to be that one of the kids took a drug of theirs. Or maybe the eldest got into a fight with him, giving him that black eye? Either way, he would be charged with a sex crime if it was something as serious as molestation.

 

[Scan_Lines]

Looks like it’s inspired by one of these screenshots of pathetic Balldo whining.
View attachment 6021764
View attachment 6021765
View attachment 6021766
View attachment 6021767

balldo looks like it's pinching

 

[Procrastinhater]

What do you think?
View attachment 6021769

Its the same thing at this point.
The host has been chosen...

 

[Al from Dadeville]

"Nick's busted front door for two dollars says, will somebody fix me already!?"

“You are not my front door, stalker. Wait for the knock.”

 

[AnOminous]

Give me a fucking break. She deserved the judge's dressing-down.

She deserved a dressing down. She maybe even deserved the max sentence.

I am questioning the judge's reasoning for the decision, and feel it was highly improper. I am not disagreeing with the sentence itself, nor even the judge explicitly condemning the defendant's vile behavior.

I also seriously question Nick's seriously deficient representation in asking for no custodial sentence at all (that was clearly not happening and should not have happened), and for not preserving the issue for appeal when the judge said it, because he instead chose to wait until he had the female judge as a captive audience in an elevator before smugly insulting her.

Considering what we now know about Nick, I think a female stuck alone in an elevator with him making hostile statements would be threatening.

 

[Smashed & Slamed]

It's not even confirmed to be sexual. The documents states that there was either physical OR sexual abuse, and that Kayle allowed this to happen without intervening. What's mysterious is that nobody (that we know of) has been charged with actually committing said abuse. So the question is, who was Kayla allowing to abuse her children?

Does the state need to prove someone specifically abused the children, or just that the abuse took place?
What if one kid harmed another kid, if that were the case wouldn't that specific event be under seal but Kayla's charge could still be public?

 

[KMFDM Sucks]

If he had been molesting his own kids and the police knew, the charges would reflect that severity. I think it's more likely to be that one of the kids took a drug of theirs. Or maybe the eldest got into a fight with him, giving him that black eye?

This would perhaps be the funniest and least bad scenario, imagine his eldest kicking his ass for being a shitty druggie and getting a child abuse charge as a bonus.

 

[Procrastinhater]

Boys we have another wife!

Just in time, Our old Wife is busted.

 

[30+GameOvers]

Well, this thread has definitely taken a drastic turn.
I don't think anyone is surprised, this was expected for a long, long time. Question was always going to be "When and How". A metaphor popped into my head about a creaking, poorly maintained building that people ignore and don't want to close up for repairs for whatever reason. Everyday it creeks more and more, the supports themselves bending as the days go by, and yet nobody cares. Then, in one quick motion, the whole thing collapses and everybody caught within it is gone. That's how quickly it can go, folks, as Nick and his concubines have found out the hard way, and yet somehow there are still people who were surprised by this(or are coping about the state of affairs even now). Shame that the kids had to be involved.

I'm not reading several hundred new pages, but my understanding is that Nick is pretty much fucked, it's just the question of how much. His streaming career is definitely over, his career as a lawyer is non-existent and he's about to go mainstreams as a lolcow same way as Ralph did a couple of years ago. Wife will probably bolt and fuck him over in court, kids are (thankfully) probably out of the question as well. Even if he wanted to, Nick is in no shape to pull up anymore, he will fuck everything he can up and pull defeat out of the jaws of victory same way as Ralph has. I am counting out possible prison time, which is very much on the table(possible 25 years if I recall correctly, with his charges).
It's just not fair, how is any other lolcow supposed to compete? Patrick and Bossman will have to work overtime now to stand any chance at Julays.

 

[The_Red_Man]

He was fucking quick, damn son lmao.

It's almost like his life depends on it...

 

[Butt_Pouncer]

It's not even confirmed to be sexual. The documents states that there was either physical OR sexual abuse, and that Kayla allowed this to happen without intervening. What's mysterious is that nobody (that we know of) has been charged with actually committing said abuse. So the question is, who was Kayla allowing to abuse her children?

Balldo will get his wig split if he goes to prison and others press him for his charges/papers

 

[6MillionCoofs]

It's not even confirmed to be sexual. The documents states that there was either physical OR sexual abuse, and that Kayla allowed this to happen without intervening. What's mysterious is that nobody (that we know of) has been charged with actually committing said abuse. So the question is, who was Kayla allowing to abuse her children?

I suppose it’s what they define as abuse. Maybe all the sex stuff lying ariund would count? Maybe neglecting the kids would count as physical abuse if they were not fed and/or malnourished