Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 124 36.9%

  • Total voters
    336
Jim said he has the bodycam??
1716683486433.png
You should've known better than to trust a Jim gag, lol.
 
JIM GOT THE BODYCAM FOOTAGE

Edit: I WAS RUSED

10 pages of Kiwis examining Minnesota FOIA and bodycam policy to establish we can't get it. But Jim "farming the Farms for content" Metokur says he somehow got in 2 days from his deathbed, and everyone wants to believe...
 
Yeah, people need to avoid jumping the gun on that. The bail hearing thing only mentioned the kids in regards to neglect, and if there was evidence of sexual or violent physical abuse I don't think Nick would have been let out on bail so quickly.

Most likely Nick is a bad father because he gets black out drunk every night, is hungover in the morning when he's supposed to be driving his kids around and keeps lots of drugs and guns in the house, and is more concerned with banging April than taking care of his own children. This is enough to shame the man we don't need to drift into false accusations when nothing has indicated that he beats or bangs his kids and saying that just allows Nick to dismiss everything as fake and gay gossip. Better to stick to the facts.

I would argue there’s the potential the children have been exposed to their degeneracy which would fall under sexual abuse as well, it’s not just overt rape and molestation. Witnessing (seeing or hearing) sex acts, pornography, or even sex toys or used condoms lying around can be hugely traumatising. Important to remember the overall dysfunction of the household and that this isn’t a one-off bad day for them.

We have no evidence any of this has happened but I’ve seen this sentiment a lot - I would proceed with an open mind considering what we do know. I would be surprised if more charges aren’t added later once social services interviews all the children and extended family.
 
Back