State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Multiple trusts exist. I only started following Nick's thread again recently and someone had found his grandfather's will. A pdf of it is in this post.

https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...law-nickrekieta.53871/page-3983#post-18427149
The will created multiple trusts and is a bit convoluted, but Celeste and her brothers have broad power over the trusts created for each of them (there are other trusts as well). Provision was also made for them to remove Ty from any roles assigned to him in the will.

Nick has never earned the kind of money which would allow him to build the house they live in now, so it's reasonable to assume that money from the grandparents' estate contributed to that cost.

A big question now is whether Celeste will try to "rescue" Nick from the consequences of his action or whether she'll force him to stand on his own two feet.
Your link goes to the wrong thing, but this post digs into the financial situation. The will itself is here in PDF format.

His current home is in the name of something called the Robert Lord Property Trust or something similar.

His mother had created a Nevada LLC called COR-NRR LLC, along with a similarly named LLC with Nick's sisters initials in place of his own initials NRR, which seems like something that may be used to transfer money as an alternative to a trust fund.

The level of indignation Nick has about claims that he has a trust fund makes me think that maybe that's true and he was being funded on an ad hoc basis by his parents, rather than some sort of trust that pays some defined amount on a set schedule. That's speculation.
 
I've been seeing a lot of speculation about the shell casings. At first I thought maybe they were from a range trip that he just happened to hang onto. Some guns I've purchased brand new actually came with a little envelope in the case with a spent round from quality control so I thought maybe they were using it for drugs (seems like some edgy shit Nick would think is badass). The report, however, says there were two spent .22 caliber shells.

Given his distance from other neighbors and the size of his property it's entirely possible someone from the Rekieta household would shoot that on their property unnoticed or at least without any neighbors in earshot caring.

.22 is a very popular caliber to get women started with guns too so maybe April was totally unfamiliar with guns and Nick decided to let her shoot right there in the backyard. Was that the incident where Aaron and his kids decided to stop hanging around the house because they're not gun people?

In all likelihood it really could just be those were just loose in a bag from a past range trip. I've found spent shells for calibers I don't even own in bags after spending a day shooting with people but it really is a bad look to have spent casings in the same room as everything else.
 
I was not aware that it was certain that someone tipped off the pastor, instead of him reporting all by his own volition and observations. I was even less aware that it came from kiwi farms.
Or is that just conjecture IF someone has tipped him off AND IF this person originates from kiwi farms?
Currently, these little snippets from a Steel Toe Morning Show alog is what we have to suggest that the mandatory reporter is the pastor. Interestingly, it specifically says that he received reported information of neglect. There appears to be more to this document, however, this is all we have so far.

1716584387806.png
1716584323896.png
 
Currently, these little snippets from a Steel Toe Morning Show alog is what we have to suggest that the mandatory reporter is the pastor. Interestingly, it specifically says that he received reported information of neglect. There appears to be more to this document, however, this is all we have so far.

View attachment 6022064
View attachment 6022063
The full document has been posted in this thread and in the main Rackets thread.



Edit: Am dumb. Give trash cans.
 
Last edited:
Just a reminder that one of his followers John, tried to talk to Nick about the degenerate changes everyone saw early on and warn him.

This is how Nick treated him.

Nick typically abuses and gaslights anyone who tries to have a Come-to-Jesus talk with Nick. Spoken like a true addict.

Also, remember the guy who tried to talk to Nick at a conference in a parking lot? Nick argued him into being convinced he only came up to talk to Nick because he had a parasocial relationship with Nick. Not because he was concerned about the changes Nick was making.
 
I was not aware that it was certain that someone tipped off the pastor, instead of him reporting all by his own volition and observations. I was even less aware that it came from kiwi farms.
Or is that just conjecture IF someone has tipped him off AND IF this person originates from kiwi farms?
It says in the details section that the pastor received information regarding possible abuse/neglect. That information could have come from anyone, including one of Nick's kids, but there have certainly been enough things happen this year, and especially since the nanny left, that bringing them to the attention of a mandatory reporter was going to ensure follow up.

Nick's streams have provided plenty of reasons to be concerned about the welfare of the kids, probably more reasons than people in the community who don't watch his streams would be aware of. I don't think we have a Kiwi gone rogue here, but it's weird and a hell of a coincidence that we had someone show up here giving specific information about the church activity of Nick's kids.

This is the account which seemed overly interested in Nick's kids. They only made four posts but justified their interest as wanting to hold Nick accountable.

 
Last edited:
Some questions, sorry if retarded:

1. Presuming they took all the drugs to to test, if they reweigh rhe cocaine and it's under 25 grams, do they reduce the charges? Does the ketamine count towards the weight?

2. Do we know what the brown powder was and if its more drugs is that a separate count or is it just '25 or more grams' as the felony.

3. Something Josh brought up on MATI, but can the force Katya to have a separate lawyer because Nick representing his wife is a conflict of interest because she can't snitch for a plea deal effectively?

Finally, why wasn't the side bitch charged after being booked, did they just decide not her house, not her drugs?
1. Ketamine does not count for that charge. The prosecution can ammend their charges.
2. We have no confirmation, and neither does the police. When they figure it out, if it's drugs, they will let the court know.
3. Probably.
 
Didn't the narrative of the search mention that a couple credit cards with April's name on them were found with the scales and stuff, probably used to straighten her lines? She might be called back in at some point.

I thought it was interesting that April's credit cards were in the Rekieta's bedroom. It surely points to one of two things -- either they're using her cards to chop out the lines, or she's taking the cards out of her pocket before she climbs into the marital bed.
 
Currently, these little snippets from a Steel Toe Morning Show alog is what we have to suggest that the mandatory reporter is the pastor. Interestingly, it specifically says that he received reported information of neglect. There appears to be more to this document, however, this is all we have so far.

View attachment 6022064
View attachment 6022063

I know I'm late to the party, but this is an supposedly unreleased leaked document right?
Or do we have the full document in which this picture was leaked?
I have some questions: (1) Can we believe in the contents of this doc? (2) How did "Nobody Likes Onions" get access to this document? (3) Why does the printing suddenly cuts off at the bottom of the page?

EDIT:
- I skimmed through @NLO Xeets, didn't find any explanation from where he got this picture
- Thinking better, the error in printing at the bottom is probably just the margins wrongly set at the printer. Very common boomer problem. We can see a date at the bottom of the page 5/24/2024. What doc it is that has yesterday date tho?
- I'm just suspicious of the source. Although it has details that seems true. Would like to read the complete doc.
 
Last edited:
I apologize if these was already asked and answered; what are the odds he motions for a change of venue due to getting Judge Fisher? Are Nick and Kayla being tried separately or together?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: feral cat #6385
Even if the pastor completely made it up and it was all lies, it would still constitute probable cause (depending on what exactly he said). The exclusionary rule only applies to police or judicial misconduct.
I don't know for certain regarding Minnesota, but every Jurisdiction I have worked reports from "Mandatory Reporters" fall into that same presumption of truth that things like Police Reports, Fire Reports and EMS Call sheets do. They are more or less sworn documents at creation.

Remember Mandatory Reporters can face things up to and including criminal charges for failure to act in the face of an obvious situation of abuse.

Now as I believe @An0minous pointed out somewhere in the vast herd of Nick posts, most Mandatory Reporters are part of some government or large private agency that have protocols and support systems for reporting. Schools, Hospitals, Department of Health etc. So when a Nurse twigs to something in the ER there is a reporting and review structure in place. They'll get supervisors eyes on it if possible. Look at it and where possible and validate the concerns. There are some checks and balances. It tends to prevent overly enthusiastic Karen reports and such.

Clergy are the odd man out in this. They are often the lone actors with the worst system of support and protocols and the least training.

I was a Mandatory Reporter for many years. Never had the need to fill out the paperwork thankfully. A close family member has been involved in making that call more than once. And it is horifying and devastating. You second guess yourself. "Am I reading this wrong? Am I destroying a family?" "Is this my business?"

But there was nothing worse than the family that she, and several other independent MR's within her organization filed reports on. DFACS disregarded all of them. 9 months later Detectives were asking for Pediatric Dental Records.

I was not aware that it was certain that someone tipped off the pastor, instead of him reporting all by his own volition and observations. I was even less aware that it came from kiwi farms.
Or is that just conjecture IF someone has tipped him off AND IF this person originates from kiwi farms?
I think we will find out that it was the older Rekeita son. The 16 year old, that likely reached out to the Pastor for help. If that document leak that has been floating around is real, it seems to reference someone with a 2007 dob.
 
Not trying to balldo guard but could complying with the search warrant be equated to an admission of guilt? That's the only reason I could see why he didn't give up the door code. Also, was the safe left wide ass open? He had to know this was coming or was ATLEAST a possibility. So much arrogance and pride......
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rainbow Idiot
Not trying to balldo guard but could complying with the search warrant be equated to an admission of guilt? That's the only reason I could see why he didn't give up the door code.
I can't imagine so.

Or if it is, you can generally say "I'm going to let you in but under protest, I do not consent to this, etc". Just emphasizing that you're not doing it willingly.

That's the general safe move whenever police are insisting on doing something and you're not sure if they're bullshitting you / bullying you.

Though if they've got a signed warrant, that's usually pretty clear evidence that they're allowed to do it. Or you should let them do it and have your lawyer challenge it later.

It might be a good idea to keep an eye on what they're doing, lest they go sniffing beyond what the warrant permits.

Yeah, I don't know, that sounds like Nick was just being petulant. Maybe he's got a clever lawyer reason for it that I'm not aware of.
 
Yeah, I don't know, that sounds like Nick was just being petulant. Maybe he's got a clever lawyer reason for it that I'm not aware of.
Yeah, it's an old common-law principle from In Greatbeak's Case, whereby it was determined that writs of the King's magistrates were only effective if they were at least a foot above the earth, and that a freeman could remove themselves from the King's system by throwing such a writ on the ground.
 
My theory for the neglect charge directed towards the wife, if it is to be true, is the abuse was going on between the kids in her presence which would explain as to why there is not a party directly charged with the alleged physical or sexual abuse that took place.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Howling Janny Dog
I think we will find out that it was the older Rekeita son. The 16 year old, that likely reached out to the Pastor for help. If that document leak that has been floating around is real, it seems to reference someone with a 2007 dob.
It seems to state that they left the 16 year old in charge and that Melin isn't sure if that was suitable. Which is honestly kind of stupid.

"...born in 2007 in charge. Melin was unsure if that was suitable or not."

"Melin advised that nobody told him any.... ................ .... (possibly "other than" ?) possible neglect and/or drug use. There were zero reports of any physical or sexual abuse and that the kids were not in any immediate danger at the time of this report."
 
Back