Bob Chipman / Robert Lewis Chipman / MovieBob / Game OverThinker - "Coastal Elite Thinker" who wants conservatives, Christians and manual workers eradicated. Universally ignorant; cannot tell reality from sci-fi. Sore loser with short fuse. Odious Disney shill. Tranny chaser and general creep. Fat and diabetic.

Also, who is this retard Robert is quoting here? Aren't shopping malls dead? Movies don't have the same pull they had, I dunno about concerts, but Sports are having a hard time, like Baseball. The fuck is this retard talking about?
Yeah he's full of shit, especially when it comes to movie theaters. Their attendance has been consistently falling ever since the mid 2000's and all the new streaming services have only accelerated the decline.
 
im glad that robert is broke, but it not enough. i want to him be so poor that he cant even afford internet.
bad things should happen to bad and stupid people.
He has to be blowing his money on Uber Eats or Door Dash or something because I have no idea where his money is going unless mommy charges him a large amount of rent.

Let's look at what he received on May 1st. According to social blade, he got 191,710 views on his channel. At $2 cpm, that's $383.42. According to Graphtreon, he made $2674 through his Patreon. That's $3057 this month, not counting what he made from Theorist, and whatever that third job is. He lives at home, maybe mommy asks for some help chipping in for bills and groceries, but I can't imagine she'd be taking most of this, especially if she wants him to move out eventually.

Unless he has some severe medical bills related to his sedentary lifestyle he's too embarrassed to admit, or he's paying off a credit card he used to keep his apartment for a few months longer, there should be no reason he can't save a decent chunk of change every month. There are divorced dudes paying alimony and child support making that much money and still able to keep their places. Yes, Boston is an expensive place, but there has to be something else Bob is wasting his money on. Probably some Onlyfans accounts.
 
Don't. Pity is wasted on those like Moviebob because Moviebob won't feel genuine pity for you.
Oh don't get me wrong, I wouldn't piss on him if he were on fire. He's a hateful, loathsome human being, completely off his gourd, who wants to see people like me put in a camp or just flat out executed for the crime of not thinking like him, and I derive great schadenfreude from any mishap that comes his way.

But still, I refuse to sink to his level of writing off people who don't agree with me, of believing that there are vast swaths of the population who are completely irredeemable. That extends to the individual as well. I still believe that anyone can make a change for the better if they truly realize their mistakes, but they need to make that first step before any positive change can happen. Bob refuses to accept that his problems are his own fault, so I don't have much hope for him to improve, but I don't deny the possibility entirely.

My pity also comes from a "there but for the grace of God go I" place, because his behavior reminds me of how I sometimes acted when I was younger and thought myself to be a genius surrounded by rubes. I don't think I ever got as bad as Bob, at least I hope I didn't, but I said some things I still regret. If it weren't for a personal wake up call in my life, I might have ended up falling down that same path.

So while I do pity him just a tiny bit, that won't stop me from laughing at his stupidity and misfortune. That probably isn't good Christian behavior, but I'm only human.
 
Yes, Boston is an expensive place, but there has to be something else Bob is wasting his money on. Probably some Onlyfans accounts.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: booze can be an expensive habit.

Although there's probably something to the OnlyFans idea. I can easily imagine Bob blowing thousands on e-thots.

But still, I refuse to sink to his level of writing off people who don't agree with me, of believing that there are vast swaths of the population who are completely irredeemable.

One of the big issues I have with the polarization of the day -- and Bob is one of the worst examples, and the guy I think of whenever I ponder this problem -- is that even if someone is 180 degrees opposed to you on every issue ... so what? Is their opinion actually going to make any of the things you hate come to pass? Massachusetts isn't going red any time soon, or if it is, it'll be as part of a wave so huge nothing would have stopped it. Why not back off on the venom a little bit and try to get along with people as people instead of falling back into naked tribalism?

But then you remember Bob is the sort of person who thinks it's detoxifying to force himself to feel "uncomplicated hatred" and you realize you're dealing with a guy who's not too far from being a full on psychopath, and you feel okay laughing at him again.
 
But still, I refuse to sink to his level of writing off people who don't agree with me, of believing that there are vast swaths of the population who are completely irredeemable. That extends to the individual as well. I still believe that anyone can make a change for the better if they truly realize their mistakes, but they need to make that first step before any positive change can happen. Bob refuses to accept that his problems are his own fault, so I don't have much hope for him to improve, but I don't deny the possibility entirely.
I understand where you are coming from. I've been like that too throughout my life. You don't want to write people off, you want to believe that everyone is fundamentally good. As I've gotten older, I have come to the realization that a lot of people unjokingly are nothing more than the NPC meme: they are just empty vessels operating in whatever society that inhabit. That doesn't make them bad human beings, but it makes it hard to interact with them because they lack having deeper thoughts and the ability to comprehend things.

When it comes to Bob, I think a lot of people have been fascinated with him over the years because they are waiting for some big moment to come where Bob shows he isn't a complete piece of shit. They want to see something where they can reason with him and can finally get through to him. They don't want to write him off as being a psychopath. Bob however has never allowed that moment to come, and instead he continues to show he is a reprehensible monster.

I know deep down from following him over the years that Bob does have some self-awareness. He'll never however allow it manifest into something good for himself because he has too much of a god-complex to accept that he is responsible for the state of his life.
 
I've said it before, and I'll say it again: booze can be an expensive habit.

Although there's probably something to the OnlyFans idea. I can easily imagine Bob blowing thousands on e-thots.
The thing about OnlyFans though is that it is parasocial. I feel like if Bob had been involved in a serious parasocial relationship outside of Twitter, we'd have heard about it on Twitter. He'd brag about his online girlfriend. Without the parasocial element, OnlyFans is just an inferior porn site with amateurish porn on it. (Ok, and a few celebrities who put their porn on there.) Twitch is basically the "Hard R" version of OnlyFans, where they are doing similar stuff but trying to stay within the Twitch rules. I feel if Bob was a Twitch whale he'd also be bragging about his online girlfriend.

Once you take the parasocial (arguably love-con) element out of online pornography it becomes cheap or with a pretty small effort that I think Bob could manage, free. So, unless he's become an OnlyFans or Twitch whale without blabbing about it on Twitter, I doubt that is where his money is going.
 
He'd brag about his online girlfriend.

See, I don't think he'd do that because money is involved.

Bob is a wee bit more self-aware than most lolcows, which is one of the things that makes him interesting despite the fact he doesn't really do anything beyond running his yap all day and night on Twitter. He often seems to have just enough awareness to know that certain admissions would humiliate him, while also being unaware enough to spill his lunatic beliefs and emotional reactions to the point we can point at him and say he's obviously crazy. But some things he's cagey about: what does he do for money? How many people help him make his videos? Where exactly is he living these days? What does he do on the weekends? Who does he hang out with during his free time? We can infer many of the answers to these, but notice he's slippery as fuck about explicating them.

If he were paying for sex or companionship or even just dirty talk via webcam, he's aware enough to know that would instantly mark him as a pathetic loser who can't get near pussy without shelling out for it. So he will never admit it -- he'll never cop to having to pay someone to make him a plate at the barbecue, or whatever stupid tortured metaphor he mentioned that one time.

It's why he fell on his face with Lindsay Ellis: there was just enough of a relationship there -- that he didn't pay for; that was the result of Lindsay just gosh-darn liking and admiring him so much -- that he was able to fool himself into thinking it was something real. If Lindsay were just some thot he was gifting a thousand bucks a month, he never would have mentioned her.
 
See, I don't think he'd do that because money is involved.

Bob is a wee bit more self-aware than most lolcows, which is one of the things that makes him interesting despite the fact he doesn't really do anything beyond running his yap all day and night on Twitter. He often seems to have just enough awareness to know that certain admissions would humiliate him, while also being unaware enough to spill his lunatic beliefs and emotional reactions to the point we can point at him and say he's obviously crazy. But some things he's cagey about: what does he do for money? How many people help him make his videos? Where exactly is he living these days? What does he do on the weekends? Who does he hang out with during his free time? We can infer many of the answers to these, but notice he's slippery as fuck about explicating them.

If he were paying for sex or companionship or even just dirty talk via webcam, he's aware enough to know that would instantly mark him as a pathetic loser who can't get near pussy without shelling out for it. So he will never admit it -- he'll never cop to having to pay someone to make him a plate at the barbecue, or whatever stupid tortured metaphor he mentioned that one time.

It's why he fell on his face with Lindsay Ellis: there was just enough of a relationship there -- that he didn't pay for; that was the result of Lindsay just gosh-darn liking and admiring him so much -- that he was able to fool himself into thinking it was something real. If Lindsay were just some thot he was gifting a thousand bucks a month, he never would have mentioned her.
Well, it's possible I am underestimating Bob. I also have trouble understanding men who gift $1,000 a month to an OnlyFans girl, that seems insane to me.
 
"He needs to be torn into a million pieces, and buried alive!"

See, Bob needs to find a clocktower with a good view of a busy road, and a comfortable chair. Then he'd just need a rifle.
View attachment 6021126
View attachment 6021125
Yes, I too think that people who hate Star Wars and think it is stupid are the best people to be making movies and TV shows using the IP. Surely that will be a great success, Bob.

Also, "she(?)" has a nose ring? What are the odds?

(And... it's a he, because of course it is.)
View attachment 6021137
I like how Star wars had Luke Skywalker, Han Solo, and Leia. So you had a younger guy, a thirty something guy, and a feisty young lady. That combination in Star Wars really gave the fans a lot to work with.
Then in the prequels, Lucas basically made a jedi for every species. There were little people jedi, there were children and adolescents. So basically every kind of person was represented as a jedi. The same formula was still there though. You had younger Anakin, thirty something Obi-wan, and then feisty young Padme.
As in, "This is the formula".
Meanwhile in the Disney Star Wars movies we have....?
You have two guys, neither of which have a relationship with the female, nor is there a love triangle. In fact their relationships seem to be completely kindergarten, like children in a school classroom that all have to get along cause teacher tells them to.
Guess what, Zero new male jedi.
There is no male hero in the Disney Star Wars canon to look up to. The closest we have is Cal Cestis or whatever from Jedi Fallen order.
Everything else is just "disney cosplay day" for women, and its blatantly obvious that is the case.
And this is the "new paradigm" that exists in a timeline where Han was a deadbeat dad and divorcee, Luke died alone on incel island, and Leia was killed by her own son, who is the only force sensitive member of the Skywalker family left.

So basically, if you give women control of star wars what happens is the granddaughter of the bad guy kills her own grandfather, and then takes the name of the old hero who is now dead so that she can have her moment. Wonderful, can't imagine why people hate it, other than it sounds like a villain origin.
 
Meanwhile in the Disney Star Wars movies we have....?
Then you have the Disney TV Series. Since The Mandelorian got some traction, Disney corporate decided, "Let's ruin this." Nothing else has had any traction. Disney was counting on those shows to drive subscriptions so they could take the top spot from Netflix, and thankfully that has failed miserably. I keep waiting for Disney to have a day of reckoning (which in practice I'm hoping with mean selling off a bunch of stuff they bought and becoming a smaller company) but I don't really think I'll see it. However, it isn't impossible.
 
Then you have the Disney TV Series. Since The Mandelorian got some traction, Disney corporate decided, "Let's ruin this." Nothing else has had any traction. Disney was counting on those shows to drive subscriptions so they could take the top spot from Netflix, and thankfully that has failed miserably. I keep waiting for Disney to have a day of reckoning (which in practice I'm hoping with mean selling off a bunch of stuff they bought and becoming a smaller company) but I don't really think I'll see it. However, it isn't impossible.
I think I said this before, as much as i want Disney to go up in smoke in a dramatic final stand. What's going to happen most likely is that they will just keep stagnating until like 70 years from now they are bought by some private equity firm that cashes in on nostalgia for their brands.

Also nice Xerxes PFP I just replayed SS2 again great game.
 
One of the big issues I have with the polarization of the day -- and Bob is one of the worst examples, and the guy I think of whenever I ponder this problem -- is that even if someone is 180 degrees opposed to you on every issue ... so what? Is their opinion actually going to make any of the things you hate come to pass? Massachusetts isn't going red any time soon, or if it is, it'll be as part of a wave so huge nothing would have stopped it. Why not back off on the venom a little bit and try to get along with people as people instead of falling back into naked tribalism?
Bob concerns me far less then the increasing number of people I see every day who seem to agree with him.

It's not Bob, it's him breaking containment.

I think I said this before, as much as i want Disney to go up in smoke in a dramatic final stand. What's going to happen most likely is that they will just keep stagnating until like 70 years from now they are bought by some private equity firm that cashes in on nostalgia for their brands.
I heard some tin-foilers theorize that... Larry Fink I think was the one (could have been someone different)... has been aiming to tank Disney's value so he can take it over and then gain control of one of the most powerful propaganda companies in the world.

Dunno how much I believe it, but as the saying goes: "if it was true, would things be any different?"
 
I think I said this before, as much as i want Disney to go up in smoke in a dramatic final stand. What's going to happen most likely is that they will just keep stagnating until like 70 years from now they are bought by some private equity firm that cashes in on nostalgia for their brands.

Also nice Xerxes PFP I just replayed SS2 again great game.
Yes, I really like SS2 myself, obviously. One of the older PC games I really dedicated myself back when it originally came out in... 1999. I'm so old.

Yeah, the problem with Disney is that they can zombie along for quite a while, but it's still possible they'll sell off some stuff that they don't care about eventually. I don't really care if they hang on to superheroes, but it has always annoyed me they bought Fox Studios. Not that I'm not looking forward to the Disney Fight Club remake, I'm sure that movie will be so much better with Disney remake magic. (Note: As far as I know there is no Disney Fight Club remake in the works. Because that would be horrifying.)
Bob concerns me far less then the increasing number of people I see every day who seem to agree with him.

It's not Bob, it's him breaking containment.


I heard some tin-foilers theorize that... Larry Fink I think was the one (could have been someone different)... has been aiming to tank Disney's value so he can take it over and then gain control of one of the most powerful propaganda companies in the world.

Dunno how much I believe it, but as the saying goes: "if it was true, would things be any different?"
I think Larry Fink already essentially controls Disney and he is quite happy with how Bob Iger is running it. I mean it's as you said, how would Fink even change Disney's propaganda output at this point? They had a trans blue fairy in the Pinocchio live action for heaven's sake.
1716701392126.png
 
Bob concerns me far less then the increasing number of people I see every day who seem to agree with him.

It's not Bob, it's him breaking containment.

Yeah, I think if you look at my earlier posts in this thread I'd occasionally say things like Bob wasn't reflective of the left in general; that it was unfair to judge them by his lunacy. It's harder to say that post-Trump. Lotta broken brains out there.
 
See, I don't think he'd do that because money is involved.

Bob is a wee bit more self-aware than most lolcows, which is one of the things that makes him interesting despite the fact he doesn't really do anything beyond running his yap all day and night on Twitter. He often seems to have just enough awareness to know that certain admissions would humiliate him, while also being unaware enough to spill his lunatic beliefs and emotional reactions to the point we can point at him and say he's obviously crazy. But some things he's cagey about: what does he do for money? How many people help him make his videos? Where exactly is he living these days? What does he do on the weekends? Who does he hang out with during his free time? We can infer many of the answers to these, but notice he's slippery as fuck about explicating them.

If he were paying for sex or companionship or even just dirty talk via webcam, he's aware enough to know that would instantly mark him as a pathetic loser who can't get near pussy without shelling out for it. So he will never admit it -- he'll never cop to having to pay someone to make him a plate at the barbecue, or whatever stupid tortured metaphor he mentioned that one time.

It's why he fell on his face with Lindsay Ellis: there was just enough of a relationship there -- that he didn't pay for; that was the result of Lindsay just gosh-darn liking and admiring him so much -- that he was able to fool himself into thinking it was something real. If Lindsay were just some thot he was gifting a thousand bucks a month, he never would have mentioned her.
In the past he has hinted at being in relationships, I think at one point he claimed to have been engaged fifteen or so years ago. But it's probably similar to the Lindsay situation. His ego tricks him into believing that these people he knows of online, who don't contact him personally or even remember him after they're gone from their feeds, are his best friends, and can't understand why they 'turn on him' when it comes time to defend him. Over the years, he's learned that that's not the case, and that he should hold back some info, because no one has let him forget the embarrassing things he's admitted in the past.

I think the "bench pressing 310lbs" incident has unfortunately made him realize he's a terrible liar for certain things. Immediately, someone asked him his technique in reaching that level, and he had to admit it was a lie. Similarly, if he tells people he has a girlfriend, people are going to start congratulating him and asking questions, and he'll screw up the story eventually. Even worse, if he names one of the girls he simps for, she probably won't go along with it, and even if she does everyone will be mocking him for dating someone who gets her tits for money.
 
Over the years, he's learned that that's not the case, and that he should hold back some info, because no one has let him forget the embarrassing things he's admitted in the past.
And that's part of the reason I (and I think all of us) follow him: the suspense of, "Will this be the thing to trip him up? Will this be the statement that causes him to fall flat on his face? Will this be the next Lindsay Ellis?" Like you said, he's learned, to a degree, to limit what he posts publicly, and that makes his failures all the funnier.
 
Back