- Joined
- Jun 20, 2019
Dick is so desperate for attention during all this. He has no Aaron. No 20k viewers like Metokur. Dude's small fish now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dick is so desperate for attention during all this. He has no Aaron. No 20k viewers like Metokur. Dude's small fish now.
the thing all of these have in common is that it is standard procedure for parents to show their kids what these things are, explain that they are dangerous, and make sure that the kids know to keep their distance from them. the cleaning supplies are for cleaning only, they smell and taste terrible and will hurt you, so don't open them. the zippo is for lighting candles and cigarettes, you're not allowed to use it without supervision. the stove is for cooking, you don't cook so stay away. etc.GOD I fucking hate lolberts so much it's unreal.
1. Electricity: there's a reason numerous rules are implemented to safeguard electricity. The outlet in itself was designed to be safe, rather than shoving wires into a live circuit (open circuit), we have plugs. The plugs require a certain amount of force to push in.
2. The appliances have mechanisms to avoid catastrophes like fuses, voltage regulators, and the entire FUCKING place has a switchboard circuit breakers to shut off when a nasty case of electrical failure occurs.
3. A child cannot operate a stovetop without parents teaching. They can't even fucking reach it most of the time. For lighters, a child will not be strong enough to crank start one. A bit of flame at worst would result in tears and a bad burn spot.
4. Dangerous chemicals like bleach are housed in special bottles that are very hard to open as a child. You have to push the cap down and use a lot of force.
Alright, I learned how to open one at 6 but I was a freak and by then I knew I wouldn't want to drink it. I was also met with Asian-styled discipline and all dangerous bottles were placed in a safe when my parents learned what I was curious of. Why? They're good parents.
5. What else? Knives? What can a kid do with a knife? The parent can just take it, worst you'll see is a nasty cut. By the time a kid's nose it white, it's too late already.
6. Heavy stuff like a cast iron casserole this dipshit should be hit repeatedly over the head with? Too heavy, and just put it in a tall shelf.
7. Pool? Sure, heard of a fence?
As if I didn't hate libertarians enough already.-5th amendment violation:
---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
---Having/using drugs around children is not harm by itself.
---No one witnessed anything bad happen to the kids except that the house was messy.
-2nd amendment violation:
---Why is there a gun charge? He should be allowed to own a gun, and it was in his bedroom not with the kids.
That's lollibertarian arguments. Not worth addressing.---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Guns should only be taken if you use them while on drugs, not simply possessing them.
---The gun charge and the underlying law itself is unconstitutional.
When?!He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
Again, citation needed.This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.
Hahahahahaha!Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.
Is a man not entitled toThe child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
Annnnnnnd... there it is!Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
The 8th amendment prohibits excessive bail. Not all bail.Bail itself should be unconstitutional.
I’m going to be completely vindicated on Nick having AIDS. He couldn’t give it to April because of Whisky dick.I agree with him regarding the fan fiction part.
There's an obvious problem though. Back when Hedonism II was discovered, we produced our fair share of outlandish theories. We joked about Balldo doing narcotics and whisky causing him erection issues, culminating to his worst day ever. We speculated about his swinging, hedonism, adultery and more. This was all brushed off as dumb fun and gay forum gossip.
Guess what.
We were right on all of it.
This thread has shown the greatest restraint ever on the site for any thread with above 200 fucking pages, let alone 4500+ now. None of the regulars here were full-on Balldo haters. We'd post dumb shit but most secretly hoped he can pull up or at least wished his kids to be safe. Any other lolcow who defends people like Vaedophile and Juju would have been called a nonce shield by now.
“Yeah hello I got outted for being a coke head swinger cuckold with a broke dick who is so nonfunctional the state had to raid my place for my kids sake. Please fix my image”Still a few pages behind in trying to catch up, but gotta ask this:
Given what a massive hypocrite Balldo-boy is, what are the chances he hires a PR firm to try rehabilitating his public image (in a move completely opposite with everything he pushed re: Vic's situation)?
It's federally illegal as well. On the form you fill out when you buy a gun, ATF Form 4473, you have to answer a question about whether or not you are addicted to or a user of any controlled substance. This notably came to a head in Hawaii about ten years ago. Hawaii has a full gun registry. They also have medical marijuana. They mailed letters to all the med users on the registry telling them to turn over their guns. That seems like a better 2A fight than Crakieta and his hoes.There is a gun charge because he had drugs on him (more specifically cocaine). Using the argument "it was on the bedroom and not with the kids" is a deflection from the main point that Nick owing a gun while having drugs (other than marijuana) is ILLEGAL in Minnesota.
This is correct, it obvious that's what he's doing. But the fact that you found his tryhard edgy word-association trash funny and not retarded speaks ill of your sense of quality.Basically he has a meme idea and then he connects another funny idea to that meme idea. I think it is actually really clever and funny some of the connections he makes. I watched him be super drunk during the Metokur Stream and I found it a bit endearing because it was so funny and clever.
If Nick hurt his pets I will gladly switch to the side of the people who wanna say he has ASPD. All his other shitty behaviour (even the shit with the skunk) could be explained by other disorders and/or just typical addict bullshit, enough so that any single diagnosis doesn't immediately jump out. Harming pets/domesticated animals, on the other hand, is almost uniquely a fucking psychopath thing to do.You know I just had a terrible revelation. Nick had pets and Aaron never mentioned the dogs or the cats. With the animal abuse stuff with the skunks and the raccoons… does anyone think Nick might’ve gotten annoyed and killed them rather than rehome them?
Nick lives right next to a wildlife refuge. Perfect place to dump a dog or a cat. He even mentioned that’s where he would dump a body.
@Balldo's Gate his dog appeared in a 9/11 stream a few years ago, right?
It's Columbian nose candy not stolen royal jewels from Fort Knox. The cops are never going to go to that extreme for some dope that Rackets may have sent to a watery grave.Legit question - I'm going to guess the Rekieta Ram Ranch was on a septic system, rather than city waste water? If so, it'd be disgusting, but couldn't the cops get a warrant to just pump / sift the septic system, should they have tried to flush the drugs?
What you brought up is something very important that people understand: everything that is happening is something that Nick wanted but didn't understand the scope of. Everything that has occurred has done so because he wanted to partake in his hedonistic fantasies, but he failed to understand that other people would be involved and that he would have to consider their feelings as well.The person that wanted it often only considered their own pleasures, and hence they got mad when their partner had fun. It was THEIR IDEA and they should be the ONLY ONE having multiple partners, you know. This kind of person views swinging as their own permanent hall pass while keeping the spouse hanging on. Very toxic kind of narcissism, which is why it's best to scram the moment your partner brings up opening the relationship!
Robert Barnes is one of the biggest retards to have ever lived in human history. This dumb faggot went on a ten hour rant during the Rittenhouse trial about how we could know exactly what one of the jurors was thinking because of the way she drew the letter P. He's willing to make any excuse possible for the IDF when they blow up some random Christian child in Gaza, or mug a funeral procession for some Arab in Israel, to the point of total absurdity. He routinely falls for hoaxes and idiotic fake news so long as it serves his political ends. And now, I guess, rather than admit that Nick is a deranged goonbrained crackhead--which we can all plainly see--he's going to claim that it's a fucking conspiracy to take down a prestigious critic of the Left?STORY: the police/government are corrupt and trying to shut down their biggest critic
REALITY: a drunk retard flying on cocaine talking about the judges pussy liquor
View attachment 6025181
Don't forget all of the important phone calls he has to make from his gigantic shower!The state of the house? He has FIVE KIDS! And is very busy! All that driving! Of course it’ll be a little messy!
[..] Should, Could, Should, Could [..]