Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 21.6%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 28.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 42 14.4%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 100 34.2%

  • Total voters
    292
GOD I fucking hate lolberts so much it's unreal.
1. Electricity: there's a reason numerous rules are implemented to safeguard electricity. The outlet in itself was designed to be safe, rather than shoving wires into a live circuit (open circuit), we have plugs. The plugs require a certain amount of force to push in.
2. The appliances have mechanisms to avoid catastrophes like fuses, voltage regulators, and the entire FUCKING place has a switchboard circuit breakers to shut off when a nasty case of electrical failure occurs.
3. A child cannot operate a stovetop without parents teaching. They can't even fucking reach it most of the time. For lighters, a child will not be strong enough to crank start one. A bit of flame at worst would result in tears and a bad burn spot.
4. Dangerous chemicals like bleach are housed in special bottles that are very hard to open as a child. You have to push the cap down and use a lot of force.
Alright, I learned how to open one at 6 but I was a freak and by then I knew I wouldn't want to drink it. I was also met with Asian-styled discipline and all dangerous bottles were placed in a safe when my parents learned what I was curious of. Why? They're good parents.
5. What else? Knives? What can a kid do with a knife? The parent can just take it, worst you'll see is a nasty cut. By the time a kid's nose it white, it's too late already.
6. Heavy stuff like a cast iron casserole this dipshit should be hit repeatedly over the head with? Too heavy, and just put it in a tall shelf.
7. Pool? Sure, heard of a fence?
the thing all of these have in common is that it is standard procedure for parents to show their kids what these things are, explain that they are dangerous, and make sure that the kids know to keep their distance from them. the cleaning supplies are for cleaning only, they smell and taste terrible and will hurt you, so don't open them. the zippo is for lighting candles and cigarettes, you're not allowed to use it without supervision. the stove is for cooking, you don't cook so stay away. etc.

but nobody will explain to their kid "this is the coke i snort while fucking my mistress, it's not for you!" so if a kid finds it chances are it'll think that the stuff kind of looks like sugar or salt and have a taste, and then the disaster unfolds.
 
I’m really curious to how unconstitutional is the warrant that Nick threw at the ground as a child having a tantrum that he is.

IMG_0735.gif
 
-5th amendment violation:
---The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
---Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
---Having/using drugs around children is not harm by itself.
---No one witnessed anything bad happen to the kids except that the house was messy.
As if I didn't hate libertarians enough already.
 
-2nd amendment violation:
---Why is there a gun charge? He should be allowed to own a gun, and it was in his bedroom not with the kids.
1716824422610.png
There is a gun charge because he had drugs on him (more specifically cocaine). Using the argument "it was on the bedroom and not with the kids" is a deflection from the main point that Nick owing a gun while having drugs (other than marijuana) is ILLEGAL in Minnesota.
---Bail requirement of confiscating guns should be unconstitutional.
---Guns should only be taken if you use them while on drugs, not simply possessing them.
That's lollibertarian arguments. Not worth addressing.
---The gun charge and the underlying law itself is unconstitutional.
1716825082587.png
1716825296472.png(L)
It isn't unconstitutional to own a gun with marijuana on you. But it is unconstitutional to own guns while having other drugs (like cocaine). If you think it's bad then you would have to challenge the current legal standard to the Supreme Court.
 
He also claims that Nick has previously exposed the local police for corruption.
When?!

Nobody follows this man as closely as KF. If he did, when did he do it?

Citation needed.

This was an opportunity to go after the county's biggest critic.
Again, citation needed.

Search warrants should only be performed against drug dealers.
Hahahahahaha!

No.

The child neglect charges should be unconstitutional.
Is a man not entitled to the sweat of his brow neglect his children?

Drugs should not be illegal, and parents should have the right to decide if drugs are around their kids.
Annnnnnnd... there it is!

Full lolbertarian clown makeup on! Start the circus music! Everybody get your copies of Atlus Shrugged out and rub them all over your dicks!

Bail itself should be unconstitutional.
The 8th amendment prohibits excessive bail. Not all bail.

This lolbertarian utopia crap is tiring. We live in the real world. If you guys want the Constitution to say something it doesn't, then invoke Article V, or shut the fuck up. You add nothing to the conversation with this tripe.
 
Last edited:
I agree with him regarding the fan fiction part.
There's an obvious problem though. Back when Hedonism II was discovered, we produced our fair share of outlandish theories. We joked about Balldo doing narcotics and whisky causing him erection issues, culminating to his worst day ever. We speculated about his swinging, hedonism, adultery and more. This was all brushed off as dumb fun and gay forum gossip.

Guess what.
We were right on all of it.

This thread has shown the greatest restraint ever on the site for any thread with above 200 fucking pages, let alone 4500+ now. None of the regulars here were full-on Balldo haters. We'd post dumb shit but most secretly hoped he can pull up or at least wished his kids to be safe. Any other lolcow who defends people like Vaedophile and Juju would have been called a nonce shield by now.
I’m going to be completely vindicated on Nick having AIDS. He couldn’t give it to April because of Whisky dick.
 
Still a few pages behind in trying to catch up, but gotta ask this:

Given what a massive hypocrite Balldo-boy is, what are the chances he hires a PR firm to try rehabilitating his public image (in a move completely opposite with everything he pushed re: Vic's situation)?
“Yeah hello I got outted for being a coke head swinger cuckold with a broke dick who is so nonfunctional the state had to raid my place for my kids sake. Please fix my image”

🥃:really:

Not sure there’s enough money in the world to undo the Balldo
 
Legit question - I'm going to guess the Rekieta Ram Ranch was on a septic system, rather than city waste water? If so, it'd be disgusting, but couldn't the cops get a warrant to just pump / sift the septic system, should they have tried to flush the drugs?
 
There is a gun charge because he had drugs on him (more specifically cocaine). Using the argument "it was on the bedroom and not with the kids" is a deflection from the main point that Nick owing a gun while having drugs (other than marijuana) is ILLEGAL in Minnesota.
It's federally illegal as well. On the form you fill out when you buy a gun, ATF Form 4473, you have to answer a question about whether or not you are addicted to or a user of any controlled substance. This notably came to a head in Hawaii about ten years ago. Hawaii has a full gun registry. They also have medical marijuana. They mailed letters to all the med users on the registry telling them to turn over their guns. That seems like a better 2A fight than Crakieta and his hoes.
 
Basically he has a meme idea and then he connects another funny idea to that meme idea. I think it is actually really clever and funny some of the connections he makes. I watched him be super drunk during the Metokur Stream and I found it a bit endearing because it was so funny and clever.
This is correct, it obvious that's what he's doing. But the fact that you found his tryhard edgy word-association trash funny and not retarded speaks ill of your sense of quality.
 
You know I just had a terrible revelation. Nick had pets and Aaron never mentioned the dogs or the cats. With the animal abuse stuff with the skunks and the raccoons… does anyone think Nick might’ve gotten annoyed and killed them rather than rehome them?

Nick lives right next to a wildlife refuge. Perfect place to dump a dog or a cat. He even mentioned that’s where he would dump a body.

@Balldo's Gate his dog appeared in a 9/11 stream a few years ago, right?
If Nick hurt his pets I will gladly switch to the side of the people who wanna say he has ASPD. All his other shitty behaviour (even the shit with the skunk) could be explained by other disorders and/or just typical addict bullshit, enough so that any single diagnosis doesn't immediately jump out. Harming pets/domesticated animals, on the other hand, is almost uniquely a fucking psychopath thing to do.

Please someone tell me the pets are alright.
 
Legit question - I'm going to guess the Rekieta Ram Ranch was on a septic system, rather than city waste water? If so, it'd be disgusting, but couldn't the cops get a warrant to just pump / sift the septic system, should they have tried to flush the drugs?
It's Columbian nose candy not stolen royal jewels from Fort Knox. The cops are never going to go to that extreme for some dope that Rackets may have sent to a watery grave.
 
The person that wanted it often only considered their own pleasures, and hence they got mad when their partner had fun. It was THEIR IDEA and they should be the ONLY ONE having multiple partners, you know. This kind of person views swinging as their own permanent hall pass while keeping the spouse hanging on. Very toxic kind of narcissism, which is why it's best to scram the moment your partner brings up opening the relationship!
What you brought up is something very important that people understand: everything that is happening is something that Nick wanted but didn't understand the scope of. Everything that has occurred has done so because he wanted to partake in his hedonistic fantasies, but he failed to understand that other people would be involved and that he would have to consider their feelings as well.

Let this be a lesson that Nick is a self-centered moron. He thought he could just have sex with anyone he wants while consuming alcohol and drugs whenever he wanted. Now he is going to learn the hard way that there are consequences for your actions.
 
STORY: the police/government are corrupt and trying to shut down their biggest critic
REALITY: a drunk retard flying on cocaine talking about the judges pussy liquor

View attachment 6025181
Robert Barnes is one of the biggest retards to have ever lived in human history. This dumb faggot went on a ten hour rant during the Rittenhouse trial about how we could know exactly what one of the jurors was thinking because of the way she drew the letter P. He's willing to make any excuse possible for the IDF when they blow up some random Christian child in Gaza, or mug a funeral procession for some Arab in Israel, to the point of total absurdity. He routinely falls for hoaxes and idiotic fake news so long as it serves his political ends. And now, I guess, rather than admit that Nick is a deranged goonbrained crackhead--which we can all plainly see--he's going to claim that it's a fucking conspiracy to take down a prestigious critic of the Left?

I guess this makes me MatI because there are people in his audience who are going to be stupid enough to believe it. But that's obviously not the story. The actual story of Nick Rekieta is that a narcissistic porn-addled drug addict fooled a lot of people online into thinking he was something that he wasn't, and for a very long time. Even long past the point of defending him, a lot of us wanted to believe that he wouldn't do things like endanger his kids, cheat on his wife, or torture racoons to death with hammers, and we were wrong. It isn't a feel-good story. It's pretty fucking shitty. But it's reality.

What isn't real is that there's some batshit insane conspiracy from Joe Biden to take down a hardworking innocent Internet comedian. That's a fun movie plot; it's not real life. And peddling it as though it is real is just fucking despicable. I hope Barnes makes a million dollars, that worthless piece of shit.
 
I would fucking love it if The Internet’s Hero, Mr. Aaron Imholte, got a knock on his front door this evening, and it was Kayla with her four, bedraggled, grubby, youngest kids in tow, being allowed them on release if she could vouch a drug-free place to stay and she had volunteered up his home because they are SOULMATES!

Surely that’s what he wants out of all this, five new step-kids, a new wife, and not just the bucket loads of clout and Good Guy Points and pats on the back he thinks he’s getting trotting out his tall tales to anyone who will listen.

Do it, Kayla! He loves you! You’re his sweetie pie!
 
Back