Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Seriously though idk why everyone is acting surprised about Sniperwoof being a tranny?
This was established months ago when SW had a spat with Lidl and took a break from the forum while Lidl did victory laps.
Was this before or after lidl ran away from the forum because she couldn't handle the shit she could dish out?

Women miscalculated because they thought troons were an even weaker species of faggot, a pet faggot that not only would engage in catty gossip, but also shop for makeup and talk about shoes as well. They thought troons could be weaponized against men the same way homosexuals were, but it turns out that unlike homosexuals, who fetishize the male anus, troons fetishize the entire physical reality of womanhood.
Yeah. Fags worked because w*men want men around but hate that most men want to just fuck them. Meanwhile a gay man doesn't want to fuck them so they get that (never knew why some gay men like hanging out with w*men. The only reason I talk to w*men is because I need them for sex). Trannies not only want to fuck them but they demand to see them naked and its not creepy because they're both girls.

But now they're trying to change history and say it was men who wanted troons in the first place because w*men never take accountability or don't have the iq to realize how advocating for situation A leads to situation B. (One of the foids famously said that even though w*men advocated for more migrants they can't be held responsible since they wanted more migrants, not more raping migrants).
 
Those aren't the only attractive men, just the most attractive [for short-term mating/raw sex appeal]. There's a reason why wahmens are drawn to Dark Triad dudes (or Dark Tetrad, adding in sadism, if you like) and that's because, for solipsistic foids, it's like gazing into a mirror. Such men are the only ones who can make a woman feel truly understood. Plus, they're the only guys who'll treat her like the worthless, inadequate, subhuman piece-of-shit whore she knows herself to be.

To be fair to the Foid Menace, the tingles a woman gets for the dangerous bad-boy are the mirror image of the pants-raising that happens to a man when a heavily made-up slut giggles and acts coquettish around him. There's a reason Private Joe marrying the first stripper that makes eye contact with him is a stereotype. I can actually empathize with women who feel innate, raw attraction to men they know are bad for them. Our monkeybrains like stupid shit.

never knew why some gay men like hanging out with w*men.

Pet fags are prima donnas who thrive on attention, and women give it to them in spades. They don't like women; they like being doted on by women. They also tend to get expelled quickly from men's spaces for being insufferable, and since they're prima donnas, they don't even rise to the top of the fag social heap. Rock Hudson had normal male friends; Liberace did not.
 
Last edited:
Pet fags are prima donnas who thrive on attention, and women give it to them in spades. They don't like women; they like being doted on by women. They also tend to get expelled quickly from men's spaces for being insufferable, and since they're prima donnas, they don't even rise to the top of the fag social heap. Rock Hudson had normal male friends; Liberace did not.
Makes sense. I knew one gay guy that acted normal and he told me one time his female friends stopped hanging out with him because he didn't act like a stereotypical faggot.
 
Makes sense. I knew one gay guy that acted normal and he told me one time his female friends stopped hanging out with him because he didn't act like a stereotypical faggot.
Pet fags are prima donnas who thrive on attention, and women give it to them in spades. They don't like women; they like being doted on by women. They also tend to get expelled quickly from men's spaces for being insufferable, and since they're prima donnas, they don't even rise to the top of the fag social heap. Rock Hudson had normal male friends; Liberace did not.
"Stereotypical" gays model their mannerisms after children. Try to do a pedophile's idea of a "sexy 8 year old" voice (maybe just do this in your head, actually) and you'll hit "flamer". It makes sense that that would trigger some women's' motherly instincts.

I think that what we call "regular gays" (wew) actually rightfully freak women out. It's a point to women's credit. Women are used to men seeing them as the "elixir of life". For men, a woman is almost like a save point in a video game. This makes sense because, again, babies come from them: in a worldly sense women are save-points for your lineage. Even if you're not taking advantage of that, your lizard-brain gives you life-feelings when you have sex with them. Women pick up on this, and instinctively use it to leverage themselves into better positions (ain't nothing wrong with that; gotta do what you gotta do).

So they look at "masculine" gays and go "what is this life-hating ghoulish creature masquerading as a man". Wouldn't be surprised if the hairs on the back of their neck stand up. Very based.

Men, on the other hand, go "whoah! He's just 'gay', and not one of those 'faggots'? I guess he's just like me fr fr", not understanding that he very likely doesn't value life in the same way, and would see nothing wrong with dying for the sake of a fetish.

It's not that women see fag-hags as "a-sexual", it's that they see them as "pre-sexual". When that changes, suddenly gays become very off-putting. You can even see that in the first response to the post I just linked—it's a man-hate regular.
 
Last edited:
For men, a woman is almost like a save point in a video game. This makes sense because, again, babies come from them: in a worldly sense women are save-points for your lineage.
have you thought about doing something on this long weekend celebrating america that’s not Kiwi Farms or video game my dude?
 
Lidl already follows deer feeder around and rates his post. Even when he post here she's one of the first ones to do so. So of course she'd sent pictures of her fat saggy tits to him.
After reading this, I checked Null’s post about Sniperwoof and saw Lidl reacting with award thing on the list. This is peak lunacy my lord.

I’m willing to bet my left nut Lidl hate-watch this thread just so it can get off its “Moid being Moid” fantasy. If anything, I feel like Lidl is the one who ratted out Sniperwoof trash talking Null in this thread so Null could come in and say, “Hear ye peasant, that potty mouth lad is a tranny!”
 
I’m willing to bet my left nut Lidl hate-watch this thread just so it can get off its “Moid being Moid” fantasy.
She(?) left this on my page when I started posting in this thread:
1716831042151.png

As a woman wtf do you even do?

Answer: nothing
Sometimes they make stuff, which is neat
 
This technique works on basically everyone who is a dipshit on the internet, by the way. You will be amazed at how much intellectual energy you can save by just refusing to engage with retards and disingenuous fucks.

"Can I get a source for that?" Yes the source is that it's obviously true.
"You need to disprove my argument." You need to stop being a faggot.
"You're a racist/sexist/whatever." Not only that, but I'm also a Rwandan genocide denier. Cry about it.
etc. They have absolutely no defense against this, if you refuse to take them seriously all they will do is seethe endlessly and impotently

I always encourage more people to engage in this style of behavior for retarded internet debates because people need to stop pretending that they mean anything past the first exchange or two. If they say their piece, and you say your piece, and you both disagree, nothing is going to change no matter what else is said. Just exchange slurs and go back to doing something more enjoyable.
Diogenic dialogue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Crate and Coldgrip
This technique works on basically everyone who is a dipshit on the internet, by the way. You will be amazed at how much intellectual energy you can save by just refusing to engage with retards and disingenuous fucks.

"Can I get a source for that?" Yes the source is that it's obviously true.
"You need to disprove my argument." You need to stop being a faggot.
"You're a racist/sexist/whatever." Not only that, but I'm also a Rwandan genocide denier. Cry about it.
etc. They have absolutely no defense against this, if you refuse to take them seriously all they will do is seethe endlessly and impotently

I always encourage more people to engage in this style of behavior for retarded internet debates because people need to stop pretending that they mean anything past the first exchange or two. If they say their piece, and you say your piece, and you both disagree, nothing is going to change no matter what else is said. Just exchange slurs and go back to doing something more enjoyable.
I prefer the old reliable catch-all "go fuck yourself," saves time and effort
 
Why is it that whenever a woman I'm with makes a decision and it ends poorly it's my fault even though I told her multiple times how it would play out. It's like arguing with a brick wall and I can see why some men only interact with actual whores instead of trying to form longer relationships.

These have to be the worst variant of the wojak I've ever seen. Even worse than the old pepe torture ones and my brain can't articulate why I dislike them more. Absolutely stomach churning.
 
Back