Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 23.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 83 30.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 33 12.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 90 33.0%

  • Total voters
    273
Kurt admits that he doesn't seek help because a mental health profession will turn him in to the police.
If Kurt is not bullshitting, that's a very disturbing confession. Breaking confidentiality is the absolute last resort of a therapist and can only be broken in a narrow set of extreme circumstances. For Texas, where Kurt resides therapist may report someone to the police (i.e. not mandatory), when:

"A mental health professional may disclose information only to medical or law enforcement personnel if the professional determines that there is a probability of imminent physical injury by the patient to the patient or others or there is a probability of immediate mental or emotional injury to the patient." Tex. Health & Safety Code 611.004.
 
Didn't EVS claim he got a call from Nick on a burner phone? and Aaron claimed (dubiously IMO) that he got a call from Nick at an unknown number? So did Balldo run out to get a new phone while his real phone was with the police? And he spent time getting IG on it so he could cope post?
Or one of the kids' phones got left and he's using that.
 
wait
there were actually people who defended jack murphy?
jack "dildo my ass on camera and write articles about how my wife fucks other men" murphy?
no fucking way lol, that whole shitshow was completely irredeemable, even nick's coke fueled swinger orgies are easier to defend than that guy

I don't have all the evidence at hand from 2 1/2 years ago, but certainly others here remember how Barnes was Jack's attack dog going after Sydney Watson, The Quartering and even Nicki Rickieta for daring say something about Jack. Then he tried to discredit the evidence of Jack being a cam whore sticking dildos up his ass, finally he just went quiet without addressing the cuckguarding he did for Jack.


I don't know what this channel is but it's the first I found with the first clips of Viva and Barnes sweeping for Jack when it all began.
 
The deeper Nick went I
I am still curious about her actually… like did she tell Aaron things were fine to strip him of parenting/custody rights? That was all I kept thinking during KC last night.

Seems to me that they have a decent co parent relationship.

Why would she want to strip his parental rights? She has a new family now and they have the kids 50/50. She’d only screw herself and the kids over.

And it makes a lot more sense that they have a decent relationship now, that Aaron came out and told the story of his divorce. He DIDNT leave her while she was pregnant, they were in the process of getting divorced when he accidentally knocked her up again.

For sure - the focus of CPS is always reunification but if she wants her kids back, she will need to get sober and maintain it, in addition to never putting them in the same situation ever again. Whether she can do that or no remains to be seen. They wont give her the kids back if she stays with an unrepentant, drugged out husband, incapable of recognizing what he has done. From what Aaron said (GRAIN OF SALT x infinity), it seems like she wants out. We’ll see it she can do it. Nick is a nasty drunk. Having low self esteem in addition to being constantly gaslit by your drunken husband must be a horrific way to live, so I guess I sympathize with her. But she did unforgivable things in subjecting her children to this.

I don’t see the Rekieta’s marriage making it, honestly. April moving in may have been the last straw.

I’d reckon there’s a 30% chance she will follow Nick all the way down, and a 70% chance she will clean up and leave him.

A lot of her identity is tied up with being a mom.
 
For those who don't know, its extremely common (pretty much standard practice) for police to seize cellphones from suspects of drug possession/distributing. That's so police can track down dealers/manufacturers.

When they seize phones, they ask defendant's to voluntarily give up their pass codes so police can quickly download the data. If defendant's refuse, police have to break the codes on their own which can take several weeks.

So if Rackets still has his pre-arrest phone, he likely cooperated with police and gave up his pass codes so he could quickly have his phone returned to him.

That would be monumentally stupid of him all things considered, I'm unsure if they will subpoena, meta/X whomever. If nick used passcoded signal for Comms and how that works even if you give the lockscreen pass are you obligated to give up signal pass codes too?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I wonder. If April flips on him could she also bitch about his shit representation in traffic court? Could that get him disbarred? If she cries about all that? Fucking your clients is bad in any profession.

@waffle @Null
She could, I imagine the professional responsibility people are more than sick of Nick's retarded determination to fly as close to the sun as possible for no discernable gain.

As a practical matter should it ever become some "who's at fault" situation I can't imagine people will feel too sympathetic for her when it appears she was on the same coke bender as him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Openly advocating for habitual cocaine users' access to firearms does more to discredit libertarianism than it does to garner sympathy for Nick Rekieta.
I'm Lolbertarian enough to be somewhat tempted by their argument that cokeheads should have guns. However, they are being disingenuous and ignoring the circumstances.

Here's how we argue this starting from a strong Lolbertarian perspective: I'm sure some of you use alcohol and own firearms. You might also use alcohol and own a car. You might also use alcohol and have children (as Dick Masterson pointed out, you might even be getting drunk around children on Christmas and New Year's).

Despite this, you do not think that your rights should be taken away. Here are some reasons why:

-You do not consume alcohol around unsecured firearms
-You do not drunk drive (Aaron said Nick was responsible about this, but we've seen him talk about driving his kids after 0 sleep and 10 glasses)
-You do not have extended drunken orgies constantly, leading to the neglect of your children

I think the responsible cocaine user can exist alongside the responsible alcohol user, but their last name is not Rekieta. He was abusing both substances to the point where he was well past violating the NAP, and his fucking pastor decided to go nuclear on him.
 
Kayla comes off as a vulnreable waif, especially if she is crying and collapsing as much as Aaron said she was, and Aaron is clearly Captain Save-a-ho. April seems hard in comparison.

N.B.: I take no position on whether or not these characterizations are correct (that Kayla is actually a vulnerable waif and April is hard), I just think that is where Aaron is/was cooming from.
I'm not sympathic towars Rekieta's wife at all. According to the man, his wife was the one who wanted a big family to then sleep most of the time and neglect them. I think (could be wrong) according to this thread this had been going on before the start of the downfall because she's on so much medication.

Having said that ouf all the parties involved including the kids. I think she has the best chance of recovering. She's near her family who could take up the responsibility of the kids freeing her to clean up (with family help). I don't think the Rekieta husband and wife has much personal responsibility so the family support is vital in getting them better. Her family also seems to be the church going type so they might be good at supporting her if they could get her away from her husband. In the end though I doubt Rekieta the wife is fitt o take care of her kids anymore base on how little effort she'd been putting over the last year or so. It could be the drugs, but she's also needed help to run the house even before that.

Rekieta the man pretty much burned all the bridges with everyone who tried to help him so no he's a lost cause. He doesn't even look like he think he did anyhting wrong in his arraignment.
 
If Kurt is not bullshitting, that's a very disturbing confession. Breaking confidentiality is the absolute last resort of a therapist and can only be broken in a narrow set of extreme circumstances. For Texas, where Kurt resides therapist may report someone to the police (i.e. not mandatory), when:

"A mental health professional may disclose information only to medical or law enforcement personnel if the professional determines that there is a probability of imminent physical injury by the patient to the patient or others or there is a probability of immediate mental or emotional injury to the patient." Tex. Health & Safety Code 611.004.
So, he's letting us know he fantasizes about doing very bad things that would get him locked up.
Sick little monkey.
 
That would be monumentally stupid of him all things considered, I'm unsure if they will subpoena, meta/X whomever. If nick used passcoded signal for Comms and how that works even if you give the lockscreen pass are you obligated to give up signal pass codes too?
You're not obligated to give police any pass codes. Police will probably just attempt to subpoena Signal and see if they will provide records.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
It's not that he didn't pull the trigger. It's that he brought his kids to a crack den for 6 months because he wanted some strange. He didn't do anything because he wanted some ass, not out of fear for the kids ending up in the foster system. Have these spaghettios, I'm gonna go bang your mom.

Again, if we take his word for it, he stopped bringing his kids after a while.

Given that he had the kids every other week, I doubt that they were regulars.
 
If it was josh in nicks shoes facing a monumental jail sentence for drugs & booze, I would probably post a lengthy neghole pozzing post on his forum profile laughing at him & mocking him on the forum.
Considering how hard it is to keep this site up and running because of the troons, if Null was even a quarter as coked out and dysfunctional as Nick, KF would be dead and you wouldn't even be able to mock him properly.
 
I have a feeling Kurt is one of those dudes that gets off to very violent rape and snuff porn given that he can't fuck any women in real life, so he has to use it as an outlet for his degenerate urges.
Kurt ckearly has violent urges/tendencies, he is also a speed junkie (perscribed for depression) I don't think that he is going to go rape some woman, but he's one bad day away from felony assaulting or murdering somebody in a bar over a petty dispute, imo.
 
No, it's worse than that, actually. Barnes seems full on prepared to argue that this is happening to Nick because he has information that would lead to the arrest and conviction of Hillary Clinton.
OMG! You heard it here first Nick Rekaita did not commit Sudoku!

He's a Dead Man  walking  crawling just kind of laying there and screeching at the Ceiling Cats.
 
That’s becsuse the chat keeps bringing uo moral issues and he’s more concerned about the law.
And Andrew, Sean etc do want to actually seem to want to have people pay attention to what things will actually matter in court.

Mindset outright said the moral failing permanantly damaged Nick.

Repeating that over and over again instead of talkking about defences and attacks from both sides gets tiring.

Which is why he went on a rant at the start.
I get he wants to talk about that but then saying he's being completely objective while analyzing his friends case is laughable. He can't see his own bias. Equally, the moral failings are very relevant to the discussion, considering he's acting like he has all the facts and it took 3 other lawyers to come in and tell him that him and barnes don't have all the facts. Right now, all we can do is speculate based on the moral failings and little info we do have. lawtubers can act surprised that nicks been done for possession but the streams have really fucking obvious with his behaviour that he's been doing drugs. Then combine the fact that Kayla has been charged with child neglect and Nick becoming weirdly obsessed with child rape jokes, I'm sorry, moral failings are really fucking relevant but instead we have to hear "kiwifarmers need to give me legal proof and arguments". We sure as fuck didn't need them before we were right about Nick and what was happening but I guess looking at his behaivour and words on stream holds no legal value.
It's already been found that 4 out of the 5 people charged with that in Nicks area, were sexually abusing the kids.
 
Back