Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GOP voters chose an unpopular Uniparty stooge when they had the chance for a real alternative.This isn't the presidential race. This is a run off to some state elections. This one is hardly a nail in the coffin for anything.
Now, if Trump loses? Yah, I'll happily join the doom train but this? This one is more or less politics as usual with the exception of Brandon being an outsider candidate who got within spitting range of the Uniparty stooge.
Or, in short, if Trump wins there very well could be a "Next time".
Ha, my last several notes on hope and happiness has been to basically say that the good result is unlikely.GOP voters chose an unpopular Uniparty stooge when they had the chance for a real alternative.
Say, aren't you always pushing sunshine and blowjobs hopium ITT? How's it feel always being wrong?
I wonder why it's surprising to anybody that a group that has elected leaders for so long finds it difficult to elect a representative.gonna elect leaders
Doesn't that also mean that Republicans could vote in the Democrat primary? Or can they only vote for one or the other?Keep in mind that Texas has open primaries so Democrats can vote in the Republican primary.
Yah about what I'd expect. Brandon won with the people most dissatisfied with Gonzalez actively but Gonzalez got a greater number of votes based on name recognition. Or, in another context, rural and urban voters. Rural tends to vote more on issues and agreement for their first consideration where as urban tend to vote more on recognition for the same. Which again says that Brandon will become a noose if he keeps pushing for the seat. As his name recognition rises, it will make him on more even footing with the urban voters who will then begin to use issues more as the means of deciding between the two.Here is on some information on who endorsed Herrera and who endorsed Gonzales.
View attachment 6032498
Looking into the deeper details of the Texas 23rd Congressional District run-off election, Herrera seems to won of in the more rural counties while Gonzales won in the urban areas.
View attachment 6032505
View attachment 6032506
View attachment 6032507
Apparently the way it works is that you can vote for any party but you can only choose one. If any run-off elections occur you can vote in those if they involve the party you picked for the initial primaries in that year's election.Doesn't that also mean that Republicans could vote in the Democrat primary? Or can they only vote for one or the other?
Here is on some information on who endorsed Herrera and who endorsed Gonzales.
View attachment 6032498
Looking into the deeper details of the Texas 23rd Congressional District run-off election, Herrera seems to of won in the more rural counties while Gonzales won in the urban areas.
View attachment 6032523
View attachment 6032505
View attachment 6032506
View attachment 6032507
Yah about what I'd expect. Brandon won with the people most dissatisfied with Gonzalez actively but Gonzalez got a greater number of votes based on name recognition. Or, in another context, rural and urban voters. Rural tends to vote more on issues and agreement for their first consideration where as urban tend to vote more on recognition for the same. Which again says that Brandon will become a noose if he keeps pushing for the seat. As his name recognition rises, it will make him on more even footing with the urban voters who will then begin to use issues more as the means of deciding between the two.
To rephrase the above, Gonzalez is mostly fucked with rural voters who want someone who shares their values, and Brandon needs to make inroads with Rural voters who tend to prefer the devil they know over they devil they don't.
Addition: The above is a large part of why our system is fucked and falling apart. Urban voters make up massive sections of political power but are also so insulated into their daily lives that they don't put more thought into who to vote for beyond "Who do I know better" unless they legitimately cannot come up with an answer to that question. They only ever actually consider two candidates seriously when they are approaching equally known status. Hence why so many congress critters are so safe from attack, especially if they have a major city in their district.
Sorry if I'm being a dick. I've just had enough of getting felted every time a good thing seems within grasp.Ha, my last several notes on hope and happiness has been to basically say that the good result is unlikely.
You don't need to be a complete doom poster to be black pilled. You can in fact note what could go well or what can happen and still say that an overall good end result is less likely by the day.
I understand the want to doom post. I -really- do. Personally I am actually pretty damn black pilled. Hell, I uprooted my entire family, moved to another country, and have spent a small fortune setting up an almost entirely self-sufficient farm which now has a a few families working in a small community. I got so black pilled I fucked off out of it entirely.Sorry if I'm being a dick. I've just had enough of getting felted every time a good thing seems within grasp.
Well it seems two people at the convention did trust CWC over Chase Oliver.I'd trust fuckin Ralph, Baldoman, CWC, or goddamn Cyraxx in the presidency before I'll trust an HR worker. Lawyers, doctors, CEOs, etc attract psychopaths so a large portion of them are psychos but there are legit reasons to want to be one despite not being a psycho. There is no such thing as a non-psycho HR rep. HR reps are below crackhead niggers.
Okay fess up. Which one (two) of you is a card-carrying member of the LP?Well it seems two people at the convention did trust CWC over Chase Oliver.
https://x.com/ciaglepada100/status/1794864871701651823?t=VBqPFf7U0IWV26r2NYjm_g&s=19
View attachment 6032635
My God, fucking degenerates. Why would anybody gamble on an election unless they’re an addict?
Honestly, you give them too much credit. That assumes they have actually looked into what Gonzalez has sponsored. While it varies individual to individual, as a whole Urban voters (no matter party affiliation) really do not look beyond the letter by the name and whether they know who they are. There is a reason AOC winning was such an upset and so unexpected.Looking at what Gonzales has sponsored in that very screenshot. Some of them being big Democrat priorities.
Urban conservatives are absolute nigger cattle in this situation.
And they usually try to be hip on local events.
I guess these must be the kind of voters fine with January 6th folks getting railroaded and watched Hannity over Tucker.
I am going to be so pissed if he somehow manages to eek out a win after I -just- said he won't and went on a long post about managing expectation.. It will be the universe toying with meGonzales lead is down to 1.4%.