How the far right is winning over young Europeans

Archive | Article

Eric Liebegut, an 18-year-old printer’s apprentice, already knows who he’ll vote for in next week’s European election — the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD), a party he says offers a clean break with a gloomy present and a bright vision of the future.
“All the others have been calling the shots for long enough,” he says. “Now it’s our turn.”
Liebegut, who sports a hoodie with the words in German “Homeland is Future”, is typical of a new cohort of young Europeans succumbing to the siren song of rightwing populist parties, with their seductive mix of ethno-nationalism, anti-wokery and conservative values.
His choice might once have seemed bizarre. The AfD was set up in 2013 by a bunch of stuffy middle-class economists outraged by the Eurozone bailouts. But in recent years it has acquired a subversive counterculture vibe that has earned it a legion of new fans, particularly in east Germany.
Experts note that most Gen-Zers and young millennials still back progressive parties, like the Greens. But polls show that across Europe, the far right, once beyond the pale for young people, is making inroads.
In France, an eye-popping 36 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds back Marine Le Pen’s National Rally (RN), while 31 per cent support Geert Wilders’ Freedom party (PVV) in the Netherlands, which won last year’s elections and has just formed a government promising the “toughest asylum law of all time”.
Meanwhile, a recent survey found 22 per cent of Germans aged 14-29 backed the AfD, up from 12 per cent in 2023. No other party enjoyed such support in this age group.


A large portion of German youth share the far-right views of their European counterparts​

1716966729489.png


Such a trend will loom large over the European parliament elections, where many young people will vote for the first time. Current polling suggests up to a quarter of seats in the new legislature will go to the populist right, up from a fifth in 2019.
A “sharp right turn” like this could have “significant consequences for European-level policies”, says the European Council on Foreign Relations, a think-tank. It could make it much harder for the EU to muster majorities for its agenda of fighting climate change and boosting Brussels’ powers.
Experts say far-right parties, such as Vox in Spain, portray themselves as insurgents against the system, a tactic that goes down particularly well with young men. Santiago Abascal, Vox’s leader, rails against Spain’s “progressive dictatorship”, vowing to repeal laws on transgender rights and abortion and end the country’s “climate fanaticism”.
“It’s about rebellion, transgression, provocation,” says Steven Forti, professor of contemporary history at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. “They say they’re fighting the cultural hegemony of left liberals, and there are a lot of young people who buy into this narrative. Especially young men, many of whom feel emasculated by feminism.”
This mood was encapsulated in a video circulating on German social media last week showing a group of well-heeled young men and women at a party on Sylt, a popular holiday island for the rich, singing “foreigners out” and “Germany for the Germans”. One of the young men in the crowd performs the banned Hitler salute.

Maximilian Krah, an AfD member of the European parliament who is leading the party’s list for the Euro elections, says the far right has been helped by the “unbelievable unattractiveness of the left in its current form”.
In the 1960s and ’70s, the era of hippies, Woodstock and the anti-Vietnam war movement, it had strong appeal for teenagers. But “these days, it’s pretty uncool”. “I mean — vegetarian food? Cargo bikes? Give me a break.”
Like Vox, the AfD also presents itself as a way out for young men frustrated by “woke” ideology, who reject a status quo symbolised by Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s coalition of social democrats, Greens and liberals.
The left is “pushing a “degrowth” agenda which is basically promising young people they’ll be poorer than their parents and grandparents” and “telling them they have to make sacrifices to save the climate”, says Krah. “With us, they won’t have to sacrifice anything.”
With his punchy TikTok videos and firebrand image, Krah has built up a huge following among young AfD supporters. But he sometimes goes too far, even for his far-right allies. In his interview with the Financial Times, he said that not all members of the SS, which ran Adolf Hitler’s extermination camps, were criminals.

The comment caused uproar in Paris, where Le Pen said her RN would no longer work with its erstwhile German ally. A chastened Krah said he would refrain from further campaign appearances and resign from the AfD’s executive board. That did nothing to assuage the RN, or the AfD’s other allies in the far-right “Identity and Democracy” group in the European parliament, which a day later expelled the AfD from its ranks.
Judging by the polls, the constant scandals appear to be putting off more middle-of-the-road voters. But the AfD’s young vanguard seems impervious to all the negative publicity. Florian Russ, a leader of the AfD’s youth wing Young Alternative (JA) in the eastern state of Saxony-Anhalt, says young people are drawn to the party precisely because of all the social opprobrium it attracts.
“It’s like with rock’n’roll in the 1950s — there’s this youthful rebellion,” he says. “A lot of people listened to Elvis because their parents forbade them to. It’s the same with the AfD. People are asking — are they really so bad? And they check them out and find they’re not bad at all.”
The AfD’s growing appeal for young Germans has been reflected in recent voting data. In regional elections last year, 15 per cent of first-time voters plumped for the party in the affluent west German state of Hesse and 16 per cent in Bavaria. In contrast, only 6 per cent of them chose it in the 2021 Bundestag election.
The shift to the right was clearly visible in the latest instalment of an annual survey of German youth. It was a snapshot of a generation that was badly shaken by the Covid-19 pandemic, with its lockdowns and school closures, and was then forced to wrestle with the shockwaves of war in Ukraine, inflation and the continuing climate crisis.
The survey also shows that for young people, worries about climate change have been supplanted by more bread-and-butter concerns — the dire shortage of affordable housing, the fragility of

“I definitely worry about my future,” says Sophie Wolfram, an 18-year-old AfD supporter in Bad Lauchstädt, in Saxony-Anhalt. “I wonder what kind of pension I’m going to have — or whether I’ll have one at all.
“We face a lot of uncertainties and I just don’t feel they’re being addressed by the old parties,” she adds.
That’s a typical view, says Simon Schnetzer, co-author of the youth study. “The young generation is really pessimistic,” he says. “There’s this feeling that they don’t have enough money and won’t be able to maintain the standard of living they grew up with.”
From Spain and Italy in the south to Romania in the east, rightwing parties are benefiting from this new mood of gloom. In Romania, 25 per cent of 18 to 35-year-olds who intend to vote say they will support the far-right Alliance for the Union of Romanians, a higher proportion than for any other party. AUR wants to unite all Romanian speakers — for instance those in Moldova — into a Greater Romania. It is critical of Bucharest’s military support for Ukraine and rails against “gender ideology” and atheism.
Costin Ciobanu, a political scientist at Aarhus University in Denmark, says frustration with Romania’s “grand coalition” government is boosting populist parties like AUR “by allowing them to position themselves successfully against a perceived ‘political cartel’”.
AUR could also benefit from a deeper pessimism emerging in Romanian society. A recent survey by IRES found only 23 per cent of young people trust Romanian democracy, and 67 per cent have considered — or are considering — leaving the country.

In Germany, the mood of economic pessimism is prompting many young people to adopt a more sceptical view of immigration. In Schnetzer’s survey, 41 per cent of respondents said they were concerned by the uptick in the number of refugees entering Germany — nearly double the level recorded in 2022.
“In the past, there was an increase in immigration, but people said ‘I don’t really mind because I’m doing OK’,” says Schnetzer. “But now they’re less financially secure. And that makes them more receptive to the AfD’s message, which is that the government has lost control of the situation.”
The drift to the AfD has come despite a flow of negative news about the party. In mid-May, police launched a corruption and money-laundering investigation into one of its most prominent MPs, Petr Bystron, who is suspected of taking money from Russia to spout pro-Kremlin propaganda. He denies the allegations. In April police arrested one of Krah’s assistants on charges of spying for China.
None of that seems to matter to the AfD’s army of loyal supporters. Its approval ratings have dipped a bit but are still higher than for any of the parties in Scholz’s coalition and polls show it on course to come first in three crucial regional elections in eastern Germany later this year.
Eric Liebegut, who hails from the small east German town of Schönebeck, feels the AfD is the only party addressing an issue close to his heart: illegal immigration. The party wants to slam shut Germany’s borders — a position he agrees with.
“I want everything to be safe here,” he says over a cup of hot chocolate in Magdeburg, the regional capital of Saxony-Anhalt. “I want to protect my family.”
It’s not just immigration, though. For some young people, the motivation for voting AfD lies much deeper. “It’s about tradition, and loyalty to your homeland,” says young party supporter Wolfram.

1716966780092.png


Russ, the youth-wing leader, says Germans are plagued by a “lack of identity”. “People have become a kind of empty shell, they no longer see themselves as part of something larger, as part of the German Volk, and that’s a really big problem,” he says.
Germans have, he says, become “fixated” on the Nazi era and the Holocaust, which, he says, prevents them from feeling any kind of healthy patriotism. “When you say you’re German, it’s like you already have to justify yourself, even if you yourself have done nothing wrong,” he says.
That’s one of the reasons Wolfram likes the AfD — its sceptical attitude to Germany’s Erinnerungskultur, or culture of remembrance. “The Nazi period wasn’t the whole of German history — it was just a speck,” she says.
The AfD, she says, offers a home for people who “aren’t ashamed to say they’re German”. “They tell you to say it aloud, it’s fine, it’s legal, it’s not forbidden.”
Krah has a video on TikTok, entitled “Our ancestors weren’t criminals”, that makes precisely this point. “We have every reason to be proud of our country and the people who built it up,” he says into the camera.
It was this sentiment that prompted his remark to the FT about the SS. “Before I call someone a criminal, I’d really like to know what he did personally,” he said. Many of the 900,000 SS members were “simple farmers who didn’t have another choice”, he added.

Krah has become something of a star performer on TikTok: a video he posted last year dispensing dating tips went viral. Noting that “one in three young men has never had a girlfriend”, he said: “Don’t watch porn, don’t vote Green, go out in the fresh air, stand up for yourself.
“Real men are right wing . . . then maybe you’ll get a girlfriend.” The video has been viewed 1.4mn times.
This is typical of the approach taken by far-right parties, which often use social media to project an enticing image of young, confident virility, says Tarik Abou-Chadi, associate professor in comparative European politics at the University of Oxford.
It’s the “image of the European man, in contrast to the non-native”, he says, “not like a traditional neo-Nazi, but a guy who goes to the gym, is clean-cut, well-groomed, well-behaved, into law and order, young and masculine.
“The radical right has been really successful at this kind of identity construction over the past 10 years,” he adds.
The benefits of this approach are clear in the approval ratings for Jordan Bardella, the charismatic 28-year-old leader of the RN who heads its list for the European elections. With 1.2mn followers on TikTok, he is pivotal to the party’s efforts to boost its appeal with young people.
The AfD’s social media strategy bears many of the same hallmarks. Johannes Hillje, a political consultant, says the party realised years ago it needed to do more to court young voters — a demographic it performed poorly with — and did so by becoming the “first party in Germany to systematically and strategically exploit the opportunities of TikTok”.
The AfD’s communication strategy seems to be working. Hillje looked at all the TikTok videos posted by the various parties in the German parliament between January 2022 and December 2023 and found that the AfD’s had an average of 430,000 impressions. None of the other parties came close to that.
Hillje says AfD politicians used TikTok to “address young people in a very personal way, sometimes on very intimate subjects”. The platform is tailor-made for the party, because its algorithm steers viewers towards “the more emotional, polarising, provocative messages”. That allows the AfD to “set an emotional bait that binds it to its audience” — a tactic he describes as “psycho-politics”.
Experts say the growing tendency of young people to drift to far-right parties is pronounced across Europe — but they stress that such people are still the minority.
Young people are still more likely to vote for progressive parties, says history professor Forti. “Most of them are accepting of things like immigration, feminism, gay rights,” he says. “We shouldn’t suggest that they are mostly voting for the far right.”
But it’s clear the populists exert an appeal — especially hardline conservatives like the AfD, with its vision of a 1950s golden era of political stability, traditional families and ethnic homogeneity.
“The AfD says Germany is going to the dogs and they will bring back the previous state of affairs,” says Jannis Koltermann, a 31-year-old journalist with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung who has written about the young generation’s shift to the right. “It’s like: if you no longer expect anything from the future, why not elect people who promise a return to a better past?”
 
Can someone explain a hopefully simple question to a burger like me. What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe? I know its not the "remove Jews, gas nonwhites, wage war, and commit to autarky" that these people like to say it is. Europeans and lefties like to say "America doesn't have any left wing parties." Well does Europe even have any right wing parties? Seriously besides removing immigrants whats the other things that make these parties considered "far right" compared to American politics?
 
It could make it much harder for the EU to muster majorities for its agenda of fighting climate change and boosting Brussels’ powers
Good. But let’s see what these awful farreightnazis want. Probably death and destruction right? What does Sophie say?
definitely worry about my future,” says Sophie Wolfram, an 18-year-old AfD supporter in Bad Lauchstädt, in Saxony-Anhalt. “I wonder what kind of pension I’m going to have — or whether I’ll have one at all.
“We face a lot of uncertainties and I just don’t feel they’re being addressed by the old parties,” she adds.
Oh. So you just worry about your pension, and want an economically stable future? Well that’s very nazi of you Sophie.
Eric Liebegut, who hails from the small east German town of Schönebeck, feels the AfD is the only party addressing an issue close to his heart: illegal immigration. The party wants to slam shut Germany’s borders — a position he agrees with.
“I want everything to be safe here,” he says over a cup of hot chocolate in Magdeburg, the regional capital of Saxony-Anhalt. “I want to protect my family.”
You want to be safe, Eric? I’m afraid that’s very nazi too. Being in an unsafe environment is better
Germans have, he says, become “fixated” on the Nazi era and the Holocaust, which, he says, prevents them from feeling any kind of healthy patriotism.
Yes, doesn’t it just. Feature not a bug
not like a traditional neo-Nazi, but a guy who goes to the gym, is clean-cut, well-groomed, well-behaved, into law and order, young and masculine.
So a fit healthy well groomed young man who likes law and order is … a nazi?
Let’s recap their main points. Law and order bad. Being fit is bad. Wanting a fiscally secure future is bad. Wanting a safe environment is bad.
Imagine forty years ago if you told people that wanting a safe, secure, fit and healthy country would see you branded as the greatest evil. There’s not a single opinion any of the people interviewed have expressed that’s actually nazi, or in any way bad. They just want a clean safe country.
 
This is retarded navel-gazing

When the established parties in Europe get fat and slow and retarded, new parties appear. Happens all the time. Some of them are successful

The EU makes it worse, if the countries were all separate the established parties would be more responsive to their populations by default. But they have to listen to Brussels too because they all enthusiastically got their fingers in the Brussels pie

It's gross and has delivered retarded policies everywhere, did these journoscum and Davos homos think people wouldn't go look at other parties?
 
This is retarded navel-gazing

When the established parties in Europe get fat and slow and retarded, new parties appear. Happens all the time. Some of them are successful

The EU makes it worse, if the countries were all separate the established parties would be more responsive to their populations by default. But they have to listen to Brussels too because they all enthusiastically got their fingers in the Brussels pie

It's gross and has delivered retarded policies everywhere, did these journoscum and Davos homos think people wouldn't go look at other parties?
Hungary's Fidesz is like staring into the future for most of the EU and leftoids cant stand it. Hungary is just 1-2 decades ahead of the rest of them.

Orban and his then centrist party were on the verge of getting utterly shit on and removed from electoral relevance by a party called Jobbik in the early 2010s. Jobbik was one of those parties that actually protested against jews, wanted mass deportations, was full of 'race war now' types. After his government tried outlawing parts of their party (see what Germany does with the AFD) he realized that it wasn't helping and they were still losing, so Orban promptly began adopting the less insane parts of their political platform. As a result Jobbik started losing vote share, and then went full retard.

Jobbik decided to be more 'moderate' after a leadership contest where the choices were 'center right blandness and irrelevance' and '1488, remove ALL roma' and the latter guy lost by a few percentage points. The latter quickly founded his own party and now has 6 mps to Jobbik's 9 - and Orban's ~135+.
 
Can someone explain a hopefully simple question to a burger like me. What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe? I know its not the "remove Jews, gas nonwhites, wage war, and commit to autarky" that these people like to say it is. Europeans and lefties like to say "America doesn't have any left wing parties." Well does Europe even have any right wing parties? Seriously besides removing immigrants whats the other things that make these parties considered "far right" compared to American politics?
Disregarding for a bit that the left and right wing dichotomy is just cattle mind control, euro "far right" "populist" parties are a capital J Joke (although to be fair voting for any party is a joke in and of itself). Assuming the system works and elections actually matter, the system is entirely designed to prevent what most sane people that know the basic history of WW2 would describe as far right parties from winning (same logic applies to monarchist parties), so the euro definition of "far right" is anything to the right of center/center-left sOciAL-DeMoCrAtS. "Not too fond of getting flooded by immigrants" or "I think we need to bring common sense back into politics" or "I think our nationals should have a better way of life" could be "far right" slogans in europe.
 
Can someone explain a hopefully simple question to a burger like me. What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe? I know its not the "remove Jews, gas nonwhites, wage war, and commit to autarky" that these people like to say it is. Europeans and lefties like to say "America doesn't have any left wing parties." Well does Europe even have any right wing parties? Seriously besides removing immigrants whats the other things that make these parties considered "far right" compared to American politics?
I can't answer from personal experience, but as far as I know, Western European "far right" is just curbing the flood of illegals, in other words, wanting a border = nazi. In all honesty, in my neck of the woods, the far-right does occasionally rub shoulders with the 1488 types, but 99% of the people making decisions just honestly dont think infinite somalians and cutting little boys dicks off is such a good idea, so they're called nazis.
 
Can someone explain a hopefully simple question to a burger like me. What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe?
It’s small and fringe. There are no true far right parties in the Uk with any kind of reach. Labour is far left uniparty, the tories are central uniparty. Reform are painted as right but they’re just the centre from the nineties. There are some small parties in Finland, and various other places that are probably what you’d think of as right wing, but they’re more socially right and financially left. SD in Sweden are painted as far right but they’re not really.
The answer is ‘very small. The parties demonised as far right like afd are barely right at all, they’re just not gagging on globohomo’s cock quite so openly.’
They will of course as soon as they get any kind of power.
There is no party to vote for where I live that’s socially right and financially centrist, whoch is what most people here seem to want (universal health that’s efficient, slightly less bloated government, stop immigration unless it’s v high skill and from compatible cultures, stop handing benefits out to immigrants, send all the fighting age male boat arrivals back, protect the environment,
 
Maximilian Krah, an AfD member of the European parliament who is leading the party’s list for the Euro elections, says the far right has been helped by the “unbelievable unattractiveness of the left in its current form”.
Masterful bit of journalism bullshit there. If you skim it you would assume from that writing that he is a self described far-right individual. Instead what he likely said is that his party was helped by the left and the journalist twisted that into some sort of pseudo confession to being a fascist.

Fine work journalist, please kill yourself and join the various other propagandists in hell.
 
What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe?
the right in europe is split between people who believe the UK would be the ideal state if it had less foreigners and neoliberals with "morals" with the occasional politician shouting Q is right
 
Can someone explain a hopefully simple question to a burger like me. What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe? I know its not the "remove Jews, gas nonwhites, wage war, and commit to autarky" that these people like to say it is. Europeans and lefties like to say "America doesn't have any left wing parties." Well does Europe even have any right wing parties? Seriously besides removing immigrants whats the other things that make these parties considered "far right" compared to American politics?
Anyone with beliefs that were commonly held by the average person in the 1990's and early 2000's is a far right extremist.

You believe it's unsustainable and/or undesirable to be flooded with an unlimited number of niggers? Far right extremist.
You believe the wellbeing of your fellow German/Swedish/Belgian citizens should be prioritized over the wellbeing of cannibal niggers in the Democratic Republic of Congo? Far right extremist.
You believe talking to elementary school children about anal sex is going too far? Far right extremist.
You believe Mike Tyson doesn't actually become a woman the moment he claims to be one? Far right extremist.
You believe being ruled by unelected EU/WEF/UN technocrats that consistently "manage" to choose the worst possible policy for you and your average fellow citizen is undesirable? Far right extremist.
You believe you should be able to consume animal products ( or indeed anything that wasn't approved by Fortune 100 experts )? Far right extremist.
You believe you should be able to move around in ways and for reasons that do not directly benefit GDP? Far right extremist.
You believe there are other important matters politically aside from muh climate and the mass importation of niggers? Far right extremist.
You believe women shouldn't be allowed to have a paid professional take a baseball bat to the skull of their child as it vacates the birth canal? Yes, far right extremist.
 
What does the "far right" even look like in Western Europe?
"Far right" is just a GAE slur which means "Hitler", which makes the left vs right distinction meaningless. Which rubric you might use to declare someone Hitler? Nazi paraphernalia? Nazi memorials? Nazis and Nazi descendants in the government? A special hatred for Communists and Soviets? Countries considered "leftist" (fucking Canada) or well-behaved gay feminist democracies (the Baltics) score the highest on each of these.

The only trait which correlates with the "far-right" designation is "populism" (promising, but not necessarily delivering, to do what voters want). "Populism" exists in opposition to globalism ("expert" "guidance"). Populism is no scabs, no gibs for parasites, local and citizen-owned industry and agriculture, savings. These are normie values. These are Christian values. These are Commie values. But Hitler lost harder and sooner so they say "far-right". (Note: you hear a lot about the lucky thistle in Germany, but they ban Commies, too.)

The sad truth is no political system in the West is less or more left- or right-wing, they're all far too entrenched in the gay. None of them can promise (not necessarily deliver) a good life for well-behaved citizens. China does. Is China left or right? Let's see: nominal Communists, race supremacists, allegedly sterilize minorities, hate muzzies, corrupt oligarchs, evil totalitarian surveillance (as opposed to good democratic surveillance), despoil the environment. The example of China makes it very clear that massdebates on the relative alignment of Murica and Yurop are just a gay distraction from both of them importing millions of scabs and parasites.
 
At some point, when you've declared everything sane to be Nazism, Nazis start to look sane.
It's so simple you might start to wonder if that is the point, to supply themselves with evil monsters to clash with publicly.

We're dealing with generations of people who have no identities and no communities. They're grasping for anything to define who they are, and they're always caught up in the struggle to think well of themselves.
 
This mood was encapsulated in a video circulating on German social media last week showing a group of well-heeled young men and women at a party on Sylt, a popular holiday island for the rich, singing “foreigners out” and “Germany for the Germans”. One of the young men in the crowd performs the banned Hitler salute.
The fact that the establishment is so fucking mad about two teenagers disagreeing with them shows how fragile their tyranny truly is. The only reason they're able to do what they're doing is because the populace is so complacent. Even the tiniest ripple of dissent is a legitimate threat to their genocidal plans.
 
If you don't want roaming gangs of low-IQ violent african and mohammedan rape apes loose in your country, then you are "far right".
I hope they’re ready to enjoy their centuries of religious, ethnic, and nationalistic conflict.

It’s going to be messy. I don’t see how they can avoid significant internal conflict long term with the decline of workers and the increased number of migrants that are sucking up benefits. It’s not just going to be Europeans v immigrants but it’ll be Muslim v Muslim, Hindus v Muslims, probably French v Germans again, English v Slav migrants, etc. I don’t see a clean happy story book ending. It’s going to be grim dark.

Also some European states are in real danger of being overthrown by cartels and they don’t even clock the danger because of their naivety. I’m calling it now that the Netherlands is going to be the center of a major conflict between Moroccans, Columbians, and multiple flavors of Muslim extremists, and will eventually be overthrown/controlled by a foreign drug cartel.
 
Last edited:
Back