State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Will Nicholas Rekieta take the plea deal offered to him?


  • Total voters
    1,268
  • Poll closed .
Then why did you complicate your thesis by introducing the "kids were manipulated" theory, other than airing your grievances of growing up in a church?
He's a retard who skipped 55 pages with quality highlights that could have answered his stupid questions before he asked plus those "theories" with that tumblr-esque name should be answers on it's face alone.
 
Claims to be simping for the kids, but puts all their efforts into demeaning the only people who have acted in the children's interests... Yeah, do better, scumbag.
I demeaned the cops and religious fundamentalists. The same thing every kiwifag has done on various occasions when it suited the milk. It is still my opinion that a mandated reporter with knowledge of suspected neglect who wanted the best for the kids would take it to CPS and not the police.

He's a retard who skipped 55 pages with quality highlights that could have answered his stupid questions before he asked plus those "theories" with that tumblr-esque name should be answers on it's face alone.
Whatever new fag. You are wrong from your first word.
 
I demeaned the cops and religious fundamentalists. The same thing every kiwifag has done on various occasions when it suited the milk. It is still my opinion that a mandated reporter with knowledge of suspected neglect who wanted the best for the kids would take it to CPS and not the police.


Whatever new fag. You are wrong from your first word.
Clearly not if you managed to miss 55 pages of information that covered everything mentioned so far including the dumb shit you were spewing
 
So in other words, there was no grounds for a warrant based on the pastor's statement alone.
No, probable cause is such a low standard that the pastor's report alone probably would have been sufficient to issue a search warrant. To issue a warrant, a magistrate must make a "common-sense decision" whether the information provided in the affidavit, "including the veracity and basis of knowledge of persons supplying hearsay" that there is a "fair probability" that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place. State v. Holiday, 749 N.W.2d 833.

Here the pastor alleged that member of the congregation personally observed a number of activities that would create a fair probability that the kids were being neglected at home, and that Nick and Kayla were using. While there might be an issue that the pastor did not personally observe these activities if it was the only basis for the warrant, the fact that the pastor is in a position to look at Nick and Kayla and confirm the suspicions, as well as the fact that four different people approached the pastor give his report more credibility. Further, as I pointed out in a previous post, appellate courts in Minnesota bend over backwards to not invalidate even weak findings of probable cause.
 
Regarding the supplemental report. I am advised that it is likely real and a subject of an ongoing investigation. The report appears to be stolen, or otherwise leaked to a third party which then leaked it to the Onion guy.

Considering this, I am unable to receive an additional copy of it.
 
It is still my opinion that a mandated reporter with knowledge of suspected neglect who wanted the best for the kids would take it to CPS and not the police.
He had knowledge of suspected neglect due in part to the continuous use of illegal drugs. How is that not justification for going to the police, who can then decide how to handle the report?

religious fundamentalists
Where are you getting that his church was a religious fundamentalist church? From the church's official Covenants:
We make four basic affirmations concerning our faith in common with the whole Christian church.
• We are an apostolic church.
• We are a catholic church.
• We are a Reformation church.
• We are an evangelical church.
The Apostle Paul writes that “all scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16). The Covenant Church has not chosen to be more precise than this in stating its view of inspiration.
Evangelicals historically have been characterized by a number of significant emphases: a strong insistence on biblical authority; the absolute necessity of new birth; Christ’s mandate to evangelize the world; the continuing need for education and formation in a Christian context; and responsibility for benevolence and the advancement of social justice.
The Covenant Church, therefore, is “committed to reaching across boundaries of race, ethnicity, culture, gender, age, and status in the cultivation of communities of life and service.”

This mission belongs to the whole church, the spiritual priesthood of all believers—women and men, young and old, laity and clergy.
The New Testament also teaches that within Christian community there is to be neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, but all are one in Christ Jesus (Galatians 3:28). These three areas—race, class, and gender—are to be of no advantage or disadvantage within the body of Christ. This is a multiethnic, classless, gender-equal vision. We recognize our need for ethnic diversity, for fellowship and mutual ministry across artificially constructed socio-economic boundaries, and for the gifts and leadership of women and men. It is the desire of the Covenant Church to pursue this biblical vision.
Membership in the Covenant Church is by confession of personal faith in Jesus Christ. It is open to all believers. We do not expect that all believers will agree on every detail of Christian belief. What is required is that one be born anew “into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead” (1 Peter 1:3).
This isn't a fire and brimstone megachurch. This is a fairly moderate Midwestern evangelical church with Lutheran and mainline Protestant origins. Describing the church as "fundamentalist" is retarded. Were you hurt by a pastor? Are you an 18 year old anti-theist angry at mommy and daddy for making you go to church on Sundays? If you're going to criticize the church, at least know what you're talking about first. These people aren't religious fundamentalists—they don't even think the Bible is the inerrant word of God. Don't be retarded.
 
Regarding the supplemental report. I am advised that it is likely real and a subject of an ongoing investigation. The report appears to be stolen, or otherwise leaked to a third party which then leaked it to the Onion guy.

Considering this, I am unable to receive an additional copy of it.
It did seem odd that the children (underage victims) and multiple people who had asked to remain anonymous had their full names on display in the report we saw. I would imagine that kind of information would have been redacted in any paperwork that was officially released?
 
Were you hurt by a pastor? Are you an 18 year old anti-theist angry at mommy and daddy for making you go to church on Sundays? If you're going to criticize the church, at least know what you're talking about first.
Can we prove that Cynically Insane isn't an Android Raptor alt?
 
Doubt it’s Kratom. You only see that shot with junkies who are trying to quit or tie over the withdrawals.

Probably some research benzo/stimulant off the dark web?
In the uk heroin is brown but from what I understand in the USA it is not brown though mdma is known to be brown in the USA but not in the uk. If I had to guess I’d say it’s mdma.
 
In the uk heroin is brown but from what I understand in the USA it is not brown though mdma is known to be brown in the USA but not in the uk. If I had to guess I’d say it’s mdma.

Heroin is usually brown or tan in the US.

If it was H or MDMA, it’ll show on their test kit though.

My guess is gunpowder or some weird research chem.
 
Regarding the supplemental report. I am advised that it is likely real and a subject of an ongoing investigation. The report appears to be stolen, or otherwise leaked to a third party which then leaked it to the Onion guy.

Considering this, I am unable to receive an additional copy of it.
I don't know how they got it, but Nate the Lawyer and Kurt/Uncivil Law covered the same document on their stream today.

 
Regarding the supplemental report. I am advised that it is likely real and a subject of an ongoing investigation. The report appears to be stolen, or otherwise leaked to a third party which then leaked it to the Onion guy.

Considering this, I am unable to receive an additional copy of it.
Are the Onion guys keeping it to themselves? Has anyone reached out to them and asked for it or at least the source?
 
Nick is sleeping in the bed he made, but I am not going to cheer on the destruction of his family. Those kids deserve better. They deserve to live with their sober, loving parents and that is my hope for an outcome.
I haven't seen anyone cheer on the destruction of his family. You're a manipulative mofo that tries to make it look like people are happy that kids went hungry and dirty.

Those kids being neglected is supported by all the circumstantial evidence and even by what Aaron has been saying, so there was no need for any manipulation. If anything the kids were probably manipulated to not seek help. Because if there is one thing that addicts do is build a whole area around them to prevent help and that usually includes making it clear to kids that everything is alright even when it's not.

---

Also the fact that the noseguard lawyers seem to only be contesting the search warrant, means that he's pretty much fucked if the search warrant holds up, which there is a 99% chance it will, right?
 
I don't know how they got it, but Nate the Lawyer and Kurt/Uncivil Law covered the same document on their stream today.
Interesting. They likely either got it from the Onion guy, or more likely got it from the same person who leaked it to the Onion. This is not supposed to be viewed by the public.
 
Back