Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I haven't heard anyone say "it's a free country" in ages.Land of the free, they said. I know, I know, you guys don't like this anymore than I do, but man. DNC really do be doing banana republic things.
![]()
It is absolutely insane how many of this country's problems are down to well-off and therefore out-of-touch urbanites being brainless.
I am starting to think TTD should be TCDD: Total City-Dweller Death.
We need to go back to the days where that kid would get the snot beaten out of him. We've been lead to believe all this time that FAFO is for uncivilized people, when in reality it's not only what our country is built upon, but requires to be maintained. Look, I'm not some sort of "death to the government" or "I will burn it down if my side loses" kind of person, but it's at a point where the unaccountability is beyond the pale.You know that one kid in school that would play pretend with you and the rest of the kids that would just make up shit as he played along just so that he wound up being the winner, even though it made no sense to the game you and everyone else was playing?
That's what this is. It's that kid that goes "Well I have LV100 battle armor with invisibility on and my guns are so powerful they can pierce through your armor, so therefore i win!". And you see this and all you and the rest of the kids want to do is beat the shit out of him for being an asshole.
Not beforehand. This will all have to be appealed, and I'm guessing all the way to the supreme court before a reasonable judge comes in and says "hold the fuck up, you can't bundle partial jury on several charges to reach the unanimous level."Is there no way for the defense to contest those jury instructions beforehand? Or have they already been snubbed because Orange Man Bad?
Biden campaigners being outside the courthouse is irrefutable proof that it's a political show trial.
These are latter-day Intolerable Acts.
Yes. But it basically never happens (though it did before the trial started in Georgia) and it would be a New York appeals court judge that would hear it. It especially never happens at this point of a trial.Is there no way for the defense to contest those jury instructions beforehand? Or have they already been snubbed because Orange Man Bad?
Biden campaigners being outside the courthouse is irrefutable proof that it's a political show trial.
These are latter-day Intolerable Acts.
Fuck Nazi Germany.I had to go look up the context of what you meant by 4-4-4. This is absolutely insane. There is no way that this can ever be constitutional. I'm at a loss for words that wouldn't bring the feds down on Null at this point. We actually live in Nazi Germany.
View attachment 6033732
View attachment 6033733
I am just hoping for at least one juror who is sane.
Looks like there might be a friendly juror in this show trial.
You're assuming it'll matter, or anyone on the jury who hasn't been threatened or coerced one way or another. I'm sure they've probably been hinted at what'll happen if they do anything remotely to a Not Guilty verdict.I am just hoping for at least one juror who is sane.
IANAL, but from what I can gather:Is the 4/4/4 innocent/guilty/no contest? I know Trump is a polarizing figure, but it looks like a straight tie like that CAN be manipulated into a guilty verdict.
Why split it? What is the point of a jury then? Has this ever been done before at all?IANAL, but from what I can gather:
No. There are 3 elements to proving he is guilty of the felony crimes. Usually, those 3 elements have to be unanimous. What the judge is doing is splitting them, and saying that they only need 4 votes on each of those 3 elements for him to accept it as a unanimous verdict AS A WHOLE. So 4 could say he falsified business records, 4 could say he intended to do it, and 4 could say it was a felony act. He will combine those 4 votes on each to push it as a 12 vote unanimous on ALL counts. So it now only takes 4 people with TDS on that jury to find him guilty of everything for him to be found guilty.
View attachment 6034213
Really makes one want to fed post.IANAL, but from what I can gather:
No. There are 3 elements to proving he is guilty of the felony crimes. Usually, those 3 elements have to be unanimous. What the judge is doing is splitting them, and saying that they only need 4 votes on each of those 3 elements for him to accept it as a unanimous verdict AS A WHOLE. So 4 could say he falsified business records, 4 could say he intended to do it, and 4 could say it was a felony act. He will combine those 4 votes on each to push it as a 12 vote unanimous on ALL counts. So it now only takes 4 people with TDS on that jury to find him guilty of everything for him to be found guilty.
View attachment 6034213
It's most likely for Biden to run campaign ads that Trump is a convicted a felon ("We can't have a criminal as president"), a talking point for the debates that he and the moderators will use to hinder Trump, and for the history books to include it along with his two impeachments.Really makes one want to fed post.
I do not understand what the plan is here. He can still be elected as a felon. People will just campaign for him which could prove even more damaging when some black Trump rep gets up on stage to testify. It is going to fail on appeal which is going to make them look even worse.
And there is also a huge assumption that Trump can even be put in a normal prison. Being convicted will not strip him of secret service protection.
So maybe it was to send a message you say? Yeah the message is, "Fuck the legal system because the left will twist it until they can put you away for life so why be taken alive?"
This is probably the stupidest assault on a political enemy in the history of the world.
I can't wait till they try to Epstein him in prison. They can strip him of secret security after 30 days.It's most likely for Biden to run campaign ads that Trump is a convicted a felon ("We can't have a criminal as president"), a talking point for the debates that he and the moderators will use to hinder Trump, and for the history books to include it along with his two impeachments.
Let us continue under the delusion that the people in charge aren't temper tantrum throwing locusts.I for one think that it is likely you guys have put more thought on the logistics and next steps to be taken than the retards in charge.
He doesn't need it to survive appeal, he needs a conviction to give to the DNC and journalists so Biden can campaign off of it while the appeal is conveniently scheduled for next December.Merchan's 4-4-4 nonsense is directly contradictory of Supreme Court precedent. He knows it is. He's daring appeals courts to apply that precedent