Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.9%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.2%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 122 36.5%

  • Total voters
    334
I thought Rackets stopped having dogs before he started Streaming & he had 2 house cats?
Kayla wanted a pug so they got one iirc. Even showed it on stream once I think.
Nick surely knows that it's a matter of time before everyone sees that bodycam footage being requested. Assuming he's unable to somehow beg the government into blocking the release, will he stream ahead of the bodycam footage to set the narrative, or will he wait until after so that he's sure to not contradict himself anymore than he already has about what went down?
Some gov agents just showed up one day and made a mess of the house. Happened so fast and they bolted all the mess down! Nothing I could do dood -dspkieta
He was also defending Jack Murphy since he's(Murphy) "Conservative". He's been a retard as long as I've been aware of him. As others mentioned he would have sunk Rittenhouse for his career. Is he a kike? I always assumed he was a shabbos goy for Frei but it would make sense being he's a (((Lawyer))).
I never liked barnes and ironically, the things nick shat legal eagle on, barnes does it. The law books, the fancy suits...and oh man the cigars. He just looks like a smarmy cunt to me.
 
I never liked barnes and ironically, the things nick shat legal eagle on, barnes does it. The law books, the fancy suits...and oh man the cigars. He just looks like a smarmy cunt to me.
Something about him reminds me of Davis Aurini. Not just the bald bit but Aurini used to pour a whole drink in his spergy videos and then never drink it, maybe thimble full sips during the video. Barnes I've seen sit with an unlit cigar in his mouth for ages, maybe he just likes the feeling of something in his mouth?
1717057119222.png
 
Message to mods, so I know this seems great getting all the attention, but letting every new user say, hur, muy feelings, will end up with this being a bot infested site like /pol. I am guilty of it too, I am new to posting here and did some of that too, but now that I see it, I will call it out. Idk what the answer is, but this is stupid having to even go the highlight option and have to look at someone saying, "but what about the keeds, they are innocent"
Highlights are automatic and it's decided on stickers and replies and whatever. Of course people are pissed because this triplet of hedonistic subhuman trash put 5, or 8 kids in danger. It takes seconds to click on the next arrow.
 
I don't think Barnes is just doing this for the grift, or to absorb Nick's paypigs. That is a very logical and plausible explanation for why he is noseguarding as hard as he is, but it doesn't explain why he is sperging out and blocking anyone who questions his "legal analysis". That strikes me as him being overly emotional about this, and caring on a personal level more than just the financial. I can't fully explain it because I've only followed his commentary on Rittenhouse and his takes on Rekieta.

Maybe he has some powdery demons in his closet and can too easily put himself in Nick's shoes. Or maybe he just swallowed the schizo pill a little too hard. Who knows.
 
Something about him reminds me of Davis Aurini. Not just the bald bit but Aurini used to pour a whole drink in his spergy videos and then never drink it, maybe thimble full sips during the video. Barnes I've seen sit with an unlit cigar in his mouth for ages, maybe he just likes the feeling of something in his mouth?
View attachment 6036281
I've been saying for a while that Barnes really likes the taste of something round, hard, and brown in his mouth.
 
How much of that is because father's only fight for custody when they have an incredibly good case because of the difficulty and cost otherwise?
Even when accused of sexual abuse by the children themselves, fathers are more likely than not to get custody when they ask. Only 1 in 51 children are believed by the courts. More people should know about that. It’s why Nick is definitely not losing custody if Kayla divorced him now like some people on here have mentioned they want to happen. We know judges love letting pedos off the hook, more than even journalists, this is just another example
 
I've said for a couple years, I think Drexel has molested one of the girls. I will always believe that happened. Nick making weird jokes about child touching and stuff. If Drexel did, I wouldn't be shocked if someone else has. I know we don't want to think about that, it's very dark shit and i hope if it did happen it comes out. This turns into something else entirely then.
Yes, it becomes retribution. Something I will happily cheer on from the sidelines. I'd even buy ad time.
 
Yes, it becomes retribution. Something I will happily cheer on from the sidelines. I'd even buy ad time.
I'm pressing X on this theory. Drexel might be a dorky looking lanklet but he's still a negro aware of the law. There's a reason even the kid he did that weird grooming stuff with didn't go hot until they were legal. Even if the man had a thing for the too-young (and I really don't think he does, I think the other young woman was just a low-effort bag and he has no shame) Drex knows better than to touch on a white girl in a conservative, 80% non-hispanic white county.
 
Wonder what April’s plan now is, or if she is dumb enough to go: “All this will die down eventually, I just need to stay offline for a while.”

Without a trustfund and given her age and position in life, she’s probably more fucked than the Rekieta’s.

I would strongly encourage her to grift off this, as she is fucked either way.

APRIL HONEY, MAKE THAT ONLYFANS AND START GETTING THEM SUPERCHATS AND GIVING US THE DEETS! AND THE NUDES!

Save up the money you earn, likely a pretty penny, for a name change and a move to Alaska.

As an alternative, there are a couple of fine young fellas here on the farms who would like to fix you. That’s a decent plan B.
 
A lot of you guys seem like obfuscating retards when it comes to Nick's kids and how much Nicks responsibility can be absolved for their poor condition. I'm glad some of you claim to have been a tough child who was completely taking care of themselves everyday by age 10 and claim that Nick's eldest is some kind of failure for being unable to take care of 4 kids by himself in an environment where his parents were drunk or coked out everyday with their swinging buddies. You sound like obtuse retards because no matter how awesome and tough you guys think you were as a child it's completely irrelevant. It's not up to 6 year olds to make sure they are fed and have clean clothes nor is it the legal responsibility of their 16 year old older sibling to make sure instead. It's up to their parents to make sure that they are. You can give a child the responsibility to do their own washing and to feed themselves, sure, but whether or not that's being done or not is still the responsibility of their parents.

Did they feed themselves? Did they wash their clothes? Their parents didn't make sure, they're legally responsible to make sure that their six year old had breakfast and dinner that day whether or not they're capable of taking care of it themselves. No matter how much you think kids are responsible for their own upkeep is irrelevant, legally their parents are still responsible to make sure that these needs are met. This is why parents are legally held responsible to make sure their kids actually go to school. Cause even though the kid might decide to skip classes it's still the parents responsibility to make sure that they don't. You might disagree with this but it's the legal fact.
 
Last edited:
I worry about the possibility April was left alone for any length of time unsupervised with the 16 year old son. That she may have offered him drugs when the parents were off doing whatever since she was the new live in nanny. I certainly wouldn’t trust that woman around my son.
Yes, it becomes retribution. Something I will happily cheer on from the sidelines. I'd even buy ad time.
 
I'm pressing X on this theory. Drexel might be a dorky looking lanklet but he's still a negro aware of the law. There's a reason even the kid he did that weird grooming stuff with didn't go hot until they were legal. Even if the man had a thing for the too-young (and I really don't think he does, I think the other young woman was just a low-effort bag and he has no shame) Drex knows better than to touch on a white girl in a conservative, 80% non-hispanic white county.
I wasn't saying Drexel molested any of Nick's kids. I'm saying if any of the kids were molested while the adults ran around playing grabass, then retribution is the only thing Nick can offer....
 
Back