Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
:story:

View attachment 6035168

(This is an old locals post)
Still this warns my heart and gives me a chuckle.

Hi nick who's coping and seething and totally not mati now?
How are the silly prudes at kiwifarms projecting so hard onto Nick they made his own children imagine they were being starved and desperate for clean clothes?
A lot of you guys seem like obfuscating retards when it comes to Nick's kids and how much Nicks responsibility can be absolved for their poor condition. I'm glad some of you claim to have been a tough child who was completely taking care of themselves everyday by age 10 and claim that Nick's eldest is some kind of failure for being unable to take care of 4 kids by himself in an environment where his parents were drunk or coked out everyday with their swinging buddies. You sound like obtuse retards because no matter how awesome and tough you guys think you were as a child it's completely irrelevant. It's not up to 6 year olds to make sure they are fed and have clean clothes nor is it the legal responsibility of their 16 year old older sibling to do so instead. It's up to their parents to make sure that they are. You can give a child the responsibility to do their own washing and to feed themselves, sure, but whether or not that's being done or not is still the responsibility of their parents.

Regardless of what you think the kids should or should not have been capable of their parents should've still made sure. Did they feed themselves? Did they wash their clothes? They didn't make sure, they're legally responsible to make sure that their six year old had breakfast and dinner that day whether or not they're capable of taking care of it themselves. No matter how much you think kids are responsible for their own upkeep is irrelevant, legally their parents are still responsible to make sure that these needs are met. This is why parents are legally held responsible to make sure their kids actually go to school. Cause even though the kid might decide to skip classes it's still the parents responsibility to make sure that they don't. You might disagree with this but it's the legal fact.
It is not obfuscating by saying technically yes a 16 year old is capable of feeding and clothing younger children. It’s really an extra indictment on Nick that there wasn’t even food for the kids to grab, even the 6 year old could open a fridge and get a snack, seems like that was not even an option though. No one has said they’re at fault or legally responsible or a failure, in fact I went out of my way to say they weren’t and still you sperged. No shit the parents are legally responsible, you’re making up arguments to defeat in your own head.
 
Last edited:
The balldo glazing has reached this level. Child neglect is actually good because it teaches self-reliance.
View attachment 6036342
I'm sure that if Nick takes the stance of "I'm a failure of a parent and despite being a coked out sex-pervert they're still best off with me" it's going to go over really well with PBS. I agree that as much as I dislike Nick and Skeletor the kids are likely to be best off with them whether assuming they stop the drinking, drug use and swinging around them. But the idea that their behavior as parents should be held to no standard is insane.
 
Last edited:
The balldo glazing has reached this level. Child neglect is actually good because it teaches self-reliance.
View attachment 6036342
https://archive.ph/Y9A5w
More replies:
1717059799565.png
1717059838096.png
 
Also to all the weird “9 yo on farms take care of their siblings” and “I would clothe and feed myself by age 10” people. Good for you. I was also the eldest sibling forced to take care of a younger one. Guess what.

IT IS NOT THE CHILDREN DUTY/TASK/RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THEIR PARENTS JOB.

Children are supposed to have age appropriate understanding of work and the world. A 6yo can be responsible for putting their toys away after playing and might need help with that or might forget to do it. A 13yo can cook a simple meal for themselves and do their own laundry. But guess what?? Kids forget to do this stuff, kids might not be sure how do it, KIDS NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO DO IT.

And there is a big difference between knowing that if you don’t do your chores you might not get to eat what you want or wear those new jeans because you didn’t wash them AND YOUR SIBILINGS STARVING IF YOU DON’T KNOW HOW TO COOK.

Also let me tell you what happens to those kids who are forced to grow up and take on adult responsibilities. They spend parts of their life chasing that freedom, responsibility free feeling they never had. They deal with constant inadequacy, guilt and shame because of course you would when you as a child were forced to do adult things. You know what all this shit leads to?? People looking for ways to cope, they start drinking, using drugs, they never want to have kids of their own, they never want to marry.


CHILDREN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHILDREN NOT MINI ADULTS YOU CAN PUSH YOUR DUTIES AND PROBLEMS ON.
 
Also to all the weird “9 yo on farms take care of their siblings” and “I would clothe and feed myself by age 10” people. Good for you. I was also the eldest sibling forced to take care of a younger one. Guess what.

IT IS NOT THE CHILDREN DUTY/TASK/RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THEIR PARENTS JOB.

Children are supposed to have age appropriate understanding of work and the world. A 6yo can be responsible for putting their toys away after playing and might need help with that or might forget to do it. A 13yo can cook a simple meal for themselves and do their own laundry. But guess what?? Kids forget to do this stuff, kids might not be sure how do it, KIDS NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO DO IT.

And there is a big difference between knowing that if you don’t do your chores you might not get to eat what you want or wear those new jeans because you didn’t wash them AND YOUR SIBILINGS STARVING IF YOU DON’T KNOW HOW TO COOK.

Also let me tell you what happens to those kids who are forced to grow up and take on adult responsibilities. They spend parts of their life chasing that freedom, responsibility free feeling they never had. They deal with constant inadequacy, guilt and shame because of course you would when you as a child were forced to do adult things. You know what all this shit leads to?? People looking for ways to cope, they start drinking, using drugs, they never want to have kids of their own, they never want to marry.


CHILDREN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHILDREN NOT MINI ADULTS YOU CAN PUSH YOUR DUTIES AND PROBLEMS ON.
And placing responsibility on the older ones falls flat for me too.
I feel like for a lot of people 15 to 17 were the most irresponsible years of their lives not to mention that when I personally think "Teenager Room" the word MESSY comes to mind.
So when people say "Oh the 16yo should've kept the house tidy, do laundry, feed their younger siblings!"... Yeah I'm just :story:
 
Especially when truth is corroborated with other testimonies and evidence. So it's not a matter of trusting Aaron on some things and not others, its a matter of filtering out his bullshit to see what fits with what has been shown publicly, alleged or proven by parties involved.
If it makes him conveniently always look better than Balldo, he's probably lying. If it makes him look like the utterly pathetic cuck he is, it's probably true.
 
Wonder what April’s plan now is, or if she is dumb enough to go: “All this will die down eventually, I just need to stay offline for a while.”

Without a trustfund and given her age and position in life, she’s probably more fucked than the Rekieta’s.

I would strongly encourage her to grift off this, as she is fucked either way.

APRIL HONEY, MAKE THAT ONLYFANS AND START GETTING THEM SUPERCHATS AND GIVING US THE DEETS! AND THE NUDES!

Save up the money you earn, likely a pretty penny, for a name change and a move to Alaska.

As an alternative, there are a couple of fine young fellas here on the farms who would like to fix you. That’s a decent plan B.
brother, is u down bad for april the fleshlight?

(i know i am.)
 
I worry about the possibility April was left alone for any length of time unsupervised with the 16 year old son. That she may have offered him drugs when the parents were off doing whatever since she was the new live in nanny. I certainly wouldn’t trust that woman around my son.

Given the recent epidemic of hot young women raping unsuspecting teen (and preteen!) boys, I certainly would too.

However, I’d be more concerned about Nick suggesting that she “teach him” about sex during a coke fueled bender when his own dick didn’t work.

We know how Nick talked about how he wished his parents shared more about their sexlife when he was a kid, so…

“April, why don’t you go and… Tuck in Jr?”
 
Not usually. I've got a couple theories on why they have it. a) it's not their scale, but their coke guy forgot his there after a deal b) they were getting so much coke they needed or worried they were getting ripped off or c) Rackets was casually selling blow to cover his and his ghoul's addictions.
I'd like to posit d) He was divvying up the massive bag of coke into smaller bags for personal use while he was away from his stash. I'm not a cokehead degenerate so I won't claim to be informed on such activities, but if I had 25g of coke I wouldn't be taking the whole lot with me every time I leave the house.
From the way that TUG and Camelot were talking, I think its wrapped up in a potential strategy to invalidate the warrant in court.

a) The children were never in danger.
b) The fact that the police waited a week to raid Nick's house proves that they didn't care about the children anyway. If they cared about the children they would have gone in immediately.
c) Because of (a) and (b), the true purpose of the warrant was to execute an illegal search of Nick's house for drugs.
Not a lawfag by any means, but could it be argued by the prosecution that the reason for b) was the cops wanting to make sure the evidence was substantial before going in precisely to ensure the warrant couldn't be invalidated in court?

I also feel like you'd want to make sure you had concrete evidence of neglect in order to close any loopholes for the defendant to slip through. Yeah it sucks leaving those kids in that hell for a whole extra week, but it would suck even more if you rushed the warrant and that resulted in the kids being stuck there permanently.
 
Lack of food and clean clothes I can get, but why haven't they been taking showers? I don't know if the McMansion is big enough for each kid to have their own room, but if not, just imagine the smell in those rooms if even bystanders were able to take notice. Unless Rekieta household literally does not have running water in their home, there really isn't any explanation why even the younger children couldn't take a shower/bath. We're not dealing with barn animals here, even if the fridge and the closet are empty the showers would still be a priority past a certain point, if only so that the other kids don't have to deal with the BO...unless something else we don't know about was going on.
Granted, they would still be wearing the same pair of clothes for an extended time, but it would make the situation better. What a messed up situation.
 
The 16 year old didn't choose to have four/five children, and even if you could construe him as being irresponsible for not picking up his parents slack, guess what, he's a kid, kids are allowed to be irresponsible. Between study and after school clubs he likely has his own circumstances to deal with. Anyone blaming the oldest child is just providing excuses for the Junkie parents.
 
Also to all the weird “9 yo on farms take care of their siblings” and “I would clothe and feed myself by age 10” people. Good for you. I was also the eldest sibling forced to take care of a younger one. Guess what.

IT IS NOT THE CHILDREN DUTY/TASK/RESPONSIBILITY TO DO THEIR PARENTS JOB.

Children are supposed to have age appropriate understanding of work and the world. A 6yo can be responsible for putting their toys away after playing and might need help with that or might forget to do it. A 13yo can cook a simple meal for themselves and do their own laundry. But guess what?? Kids forget to do this stuff, kids might not be sure how do it, KIDS NEED TO BE TAUGHT HOW TO DO IT.

And there is a big difference between knowing that if you don’t do your chores you might not get to eat what you want or wear those new jeans because you didn’t wash them AND YOUR SIBILINGS STARVING IF YOU DON’T KNOW HOW TO COOK.

Also let me tell you what happens to those kids who are forced to grow up and take on adult responsibilities. They spend parts of their life chasing that freedom, responsibility free feeling they never had. They deal with constant inadequacy, guilt and shame because of course you would when you as a child were forced to do adult things. You know what all this shit leads to?? People looking for ways to cope, they start drinking, using drugs, they never want to have kids of their own, they never want to marry.


CHILDREN ARE SUPPOSED TO BE CHILDREN NOT MINI ADULTS YOU CAN PUSH YOUR DUTIES AND PROBLEMS ON.
Then how come children can choose their own gender and pronouns? Typical kiwifarmer, dogwhistling for trans genocide
 
The balldo glazing has reached this level. Child neglect is actually good because it teaches self-reliance.
View attachment 6036342

Is prison and CPS always the best solution for drugabuse/neglect? No.

However, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to hold Rekieta up to his own standard.

Nick has told us many times how neglectful parents and cucks need to go against the wall and taken great pleasure in the downfall of others.

When the balldo is on the other nut, it’s suddenly time to “not lose persepective”.

Yeah, let’s just send Nick a superchat and hope gets better! Fuck off.
 
Back